Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Radiall stiffness

Started by George · · Last activity · 10 posts · 598 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
7 April 2004
Last activity
15 April 2004
Original author
George
Posts
10
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
598
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–10 of 10
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hi, Did you watch on TV the last Tour of Flandres? That's
    my question. Some wise people say that high profile rim
    wheel radiall stiffness is the same as in low profile rim
    ones. If they really have right, why on Tour of Flandres or
    Paris-Roubaix riders use only low profile rim wheels?
    Regards, George

  2. Quoted post said:

    Originally posted by George
    Hi, Did you watch on TV the last Tour of Flandres? That's
    my question. Some wise people say that high profile rim
    wheel radiall stiffness is the same as in low profile rim
    ones. If they really have right, why on Tour of Flandres or
    Paris-Roubaix riders use only low profile rim wheels?
    Regards, George

    Didn't see the Race, but I think the radail stiffness issue is something Jobst Brandt would be quite qualified to answer.
    I doubt that you could feel the difference in radial stiffness of the rim itself due to large radial tire elasticity.
    When I build wheels I can tell that I get about 1 mm less radial rim shrinkage on a CXP-33 rim than a OpenPro with the same amount of spoke tension. However, when you ride the tensioned wheel, I don't think the radial stifness difference would be significant.

  3. George said:

    Hi, Did you watch on TV the last Tour of Flandres?

    Episode of the Simpsons?

    Bill "ride around the Bible Belt w/Ned" S.

  4. S o r n i said:

    Episode of the Simpsons?


    On what newsgroup did you write? alt.tv.simpsons?
    Regards, George.

  5. George said:
    S o r n i said:

    Episode of the Simpsons?


    On what newsgroup did you write? alt.tv.simpsons?

    Ya see, Ned Flanders is...oh, never mind.

    Bill "besides, you snipped all reference material" S.

  6. George said:

    Some wise people say that high profile rim wheel radiall
    stiffness is the same as in low profile rim ones. If they
    really have right, why on Tour of Flandres or Paris-
    Roubaix riders use only low profile rim wheels?

    One possibility is that racers are a suggestible folk, quick
    to adopt things that they believe to be to their advantage,
    but loath to discard those things which previous race
    winners have in common. There is a ton of folklore
    surrounding races held on cobblestone courses, much of which
    may have been valid at some historical time.

    Another possibility is that such race routes as you mention
    lend themselves well to the use of fatter-than-normal tires
    at lower-than-normal pressures. Tires at low pressure behave
    more predictably when mounted on rims close to the width of
    the tire. The wider types of lightweight racing rims will
    tend to have a low profile. Whether racers in the events you
    named actually use wider than usual rims, I don't know.

    I don't believe I've heard anybody suggest that the radial
    stiffness of wheels with high and low profile rims is identical--
    what they have pointed out is that there is not a
    perceptible amount of "give" in the rim of a properly
    tensioned wheel before the spokes in the affected area go
    completely slack, and that if they do this more than
    occasionally, the wheel will fail in a very short time.
    Therefore wheels that last for many miles demonstrate that
    they have not been absorbing any detectable amount of shock.

    Chalo Colina

  7. George said:

    Hi, Did you watch on TV the last Tour of Flandres? That's
    my question. Some wise people say that high profile rim
    wheel radiall stiffness is the same as in low profile rim
    ones. If they really have right, why on Tour of Flandres
    or Paris-Roubaix riders use only low profile rim wheels?

    Probably because they prefer to use "conventional" wheels
    for durability on cobbled surfaces, as opposed to the ultra
    light aerodynamic wheels that are fairly commonly used in
    pro racing now. I guess you could ask why they don't use 32
    spoke wheels with a strong aero rim like a Deep V - perhaps
    a belief that they're too heavy (probably misguided).

  8. "George" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hi, Did you watch on TV the last Tour of Flandres? That's
    my question. Some wise people say that high profile rim
    wheel radiall stiffness is the same as in low profile rim
    ones. If they really have right, why on Tour of Flandres
    or Paris-Roubaix riders use only low profile rim wheels?
    Regards, George

    Because they absorb more and lessen the shock.

    Imagine racing on cobblestone streets. Imagine your fillings
    rattling loose.

    Dave

  9. onefred said:
    George said:

    why on Tour of Flandres or Paris-Roubaix riders use only
    low profile rim wheels?

    Because they absorb more and lessen the shock.

    Absolutely. After rattling away on rims with a mere 0.01" of
    deflection, the whopping 0.02" deflection of low profile
    rims are like riding on a cloud.

    (Numbers completely made up to make a point.)
    --
    terry morse Palo Alto, CA bike.terrymorse.combike.terrymorse.com

  10. "Terry Morse" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    onefred said:
    George said:

    why on Tour of Flandres or Paris-Roubaix riders use
    only low profile rim wheels?

    Because they absorb more and lessen the shock.

    Absolutely. After rattling away on rims with a mere 0.01"
    of deflection, the whopping 0.02" deflection of low
    profile rims are like riding on a cloud.

    (Numbers completely made up to make a point.)

    Wow, a 50% difference. Didn't think it'd be so great.
    Perhaps I should consider building a set of aero wheels for
    myself. Actually, I've been planning this for the past few
    months. Already got the hubs and spokes... Woohoo!

    Dave

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.