Recumbent bicycles · Public discussion

RAAM: Race Across America

Started by Edward Dolan · · Last activity · 21 posts · 1,223 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Recumbent bicycles
Published
21 June 2004
Last activity
30 June 2004
Original author
Edward Dolan
Posts
21
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,223
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 21
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. RAAM has been around for a number of years now. I remember John Marino as
    being one of the originators of the race. It is strictly for endurance
    athletes and this is the sort of thing that has always interested me. I have
    absolutely no interest in staged races like the Tour de France or
    criteriums. Endurance long distance events are where it's at for me!

    I remember William F. Buckley once stating that it was more interesting for
    him to be able to jump out of an airplane and land in a bucket of water than
    to traverse Death Valley hiking in the summer heat. I am just the opposite
    of that. Only endurance events interest me. I would much rather be able to
    hike the length of Death Valley than perform any skillful thing. In fact, I
    have always wanted to hike across the Sahara Desert from the Mediterranean
    littoral to Timbuktu. But I have always known that I am as crazy as a
    Minnesota loon. Maybe if there is a life after death, God in His infinite
    mercy will permit my spirit to hike across the Sahara Desert to Timbuktu,
    after which I can go into oblivion permanently at rest with the demons that
    have tormented me all my life.

    There is a fellow from Sheldon, Iowa (Randy Van Zee) who is participating in
    this event. He lives not far from where I am at. So I will follow this event
    to see how he does. RAAM began today in San Diego and will conclude in
    Atlantic City in a bit over a week from now.

    In any event, there may be some on this newsgroup who may be interested in
    this event. Here is the web site if you are interested:

    http://www.raceacrossamerica.org/

    There you will be able to get daily updates and special reports on how the
    race is going. Enjoy!

    --
    Ed Dolan - Minnesota

  2. This falls in the category of really weird. I have this fantasy of
    going fast-- in going slow I help make the rest of these fast riders
    possible. After all, if it weren't for us their wouldn't be a anyone
    to go faster than.

    Anyway, while I am imaging how fast I can be, I occassionally hit
    ultra cycling sites and dream about doing enough brevets to actually
    do Paris Brest Paris. I watch the twelve hour dvd version of the tour
    de france. I watch the Giro de Italia.

    So I hit the RAAM site. I learned that the RAAM ride leader will be
    going through Circleville, OH between 5-7am tomorrow morning. I also
    learned that the team in the lead as of last night eastern time is ALS
    Lightning. This of course interested me because:

    I own a Lightning.

    Mine of course is the slow kind, a Stealth, but it is based on the
    P-38.

    So my interest peaked. Then I read further about the four man team.
    To my surprise it looks like one of the riders is the cousin of my
    partner...his name Bob Fourney! I couldn't believe this.... so I
    asked and sure enough we think its the same guy. He was always into
    ultra cycling but this takes the cake.

    So I figure a field trip to Circleville am tomorrow worth a trip.
    Note that at least two of the four ride leaders, out to set a coast to
    coast record of slightly over 5 days, are recumbents on LIGHTNINGS!

    For those of you following my mosts, this would be the hare!

  3. "Melanie" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    This falls in the category of really weird. I have this fantasy of
    going fast-- in going slow I help make the rest of these fast riders
    possible. After all, if it weren't for us their wouldn't be a anyone
    to go faster than.

    Anyway, while I am imaging how fast I can be, I occassionally hit
    ultra cycling sites and dream about doing enough brevets to actually
    do Paris Brest Paris. I watch the twelve hour dvd version of the tour
    de france. I watch the Giro de Italia.


    [...]

    This newsgroup is replete with those who think the Tour de France is God's
    gift to humanity. It appears that you fall into this category yourself. You
    are lucky as the world is set up to cater to these types of really weird
    interests.

    RAAM is of course an abomination, but I do like the idea of being able to
    cycle across this country. But I would not make it a race. It would just be
    a tour and the longer it took the better. This mania for always wanting to
    turn everything into a race and to want to go fast is simply insane.

    It's fun to tweak all the wanna-go-fast crowd here on ARBR. They can no more
    understand me than I can them.

    --
    Ed Dolan - Minnesota

  4. Well it turns out the Lightning ALS team does have the person we
    thought on their team. They are currently between Athens, Ohio and
    Parkersburg West Virginia, and they are flying! Unfortunately for us,
    they are going so fast that we can't even catch them in the car....

    I am so excited!

  5. "Melanie" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Well it turns out the Lightning ALS team does have the person we
    thought on their team. They are currently between Athens, Ohio and
    Parkersburg West Virginia, and they are flying! Unfortunately for us,
    they are going so fast that we can't even catch them in the car....

    I am so excited!

    Melanie, they are going so fast because they can't wait to get the misery
    over with. They are no doubt asking themselves with every passing mile why
    they are doing this thing. And they are no doubt resolving never to do
    anything this foolish ever again in their lives if they survive it.

    Aren't you glad that you and I are smart enough not to even want to do this
    crazy sort of thing. It is enough to sit on the sidelines and laugh at them.

    --
    Ed Dolan - Minnesota

  6. Heck, that is the beauty of being on a bent. We can take our time or
    rush along depending on mood, wind, incline or inclination. I'm slow
    and that's it... happy but slow...

    Bob Fourney is fast, extremely fast, so fast in fact that he and the
    rest of his faired Lightning companions just finished 1st ahead of
    every other team, all uprights at the Race Across America. We are so
    slow and he is so fast.

    I must admit we have been pretty excited in this household since
    discovering that Bob was doing the race and then actually winning with
    Lightning's team. We did track them all the way across Ohio thence to
    West Virginia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey just this
    morning.

    Alright, so I am living vicariously....

    back to celebrating the slow tomorrow....

    Melanie

  7. "Melanie" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Heck, that is the beauty of being on a bent. We can take our time or
    rush along depending on mood, wind, incline or inclination. I'm slow
    and that's it... happy but slow...

    I am always telling everyone that there is no penalty for being slow on a
    recumbent when it comes to comfort. That factor stays the same whether fast
    or slow. That is not true with uprights. If you go slow on an upright you
    will suffer for it.

    Quoted message said:

    Bob Fourney is fast, extremely fast, so fast in fact that he and the
    rest of his faired Lightning companions just finished 1st ahead of
    every other team, all uprights at the Race Across America. We are so
    slow and he is so fast.

    I must admit we have been pretty excited in this household since
    discovering that Bob was doing the race and then actually winning with
    Lightning's team. We did track them all the way across Ohio thence to
    West Virginia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey just this
    morning.

    Alright, so I am living vicariously....

    It is better to live vicariously when it comes to some things than to live
    them in your own person. I have been reading books about mountain climbing
    all my life but I have never once wanted to "climb" a mountain myself.. I
    have walked up many a mountain, but I refuse to climb them. That is because
    I have a very highly developed sense of self preservation. Most mountain
    climbers manage to get themselves killed sooner or later. Mostly avalanches
    take them out.

    Following bicycle races is a harmless pastime and I do not begrudge anyone a
    harmless pastime. I wish I could be so easily amused. But apparently it is
    not to be. Unless I am intellectually stimulated I am bored. And so I use my
    mind and do not spend any time at all following the physical exploits of
    others.

    Your posts are unique in that you do not post the message to which you are
    responding. This could get really confusing if too many did this.

    --
    Ed Dolan - Minnesota

  8. Ed wrote that > [my} posts are unique in that [I] do not post the
    message to which you are responding. This could get really confusing
    if too many did this.

    Reply:

    Dear Ed,

    My newsgroup reader gives me the whole thread. I can easily see what
    went before, and I don't need to read it again, in fact, to me that is
    a waste of bandwidth. I didn't realize there were others who were
    reading the posts in a thread without reading what went before.

    When I first started on ng, it was frequent net etiquette to post only
    quote that portion of a comment that was necessary to understand the
    follow up in context.

    Have the readers changed so that this is no longer true? I have been
    away a while.

    I do apologize if I have confused you in any way. That was not my
    intention.

    Melanie

  9. On 27 Jun 2004 11:55:18 -0700, [email hidden]
    (Melanie) wrote in message
    <[email hidden]>:

    Quoted message said:

    My newsgroup reader gives me the whole thread. I can easily see what
    went before, and I don't need to read it again, in fact, to me that is
    a waste of bandwidth.

    "waste of bandwidth" is as good a description of Mr Ed as you will be
    needing :-)

    Quoted message said:

    When I first started on ng, it was frequent net etiquette to post only
    quote that portion of a comment that was necessary to understand the
    follow up in context.

    Is still correct usage in my book.

    Guy
    --
    May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
    http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

    88% of helmet statistics are made up, 65% of them at Washington University

  10. "Melanie" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    [quote="Quoted message"]Ed wrote that > [my} posts are unique in that [I] do not post the
    message to which you are responding. This could get really confusing
    if too many did this.

    Reply:

    Dear Ed,

    My newsgroup reader gives me the whole thread. I can easily see what
    went before, and I don't need to read it again, in fact, to me that is
    a waste of bandwidth. I didn't realize there were others who were
    reading the posts in a thread without reading what went before.[/quote]

    You are effecting a letter writing style as opposed to a newsgroup posting
    style. But you are not contentious like I am and so others are not jumping
    in on your messages and taking issue with everything you say. If they were,
    your style would not work. I am the opposite of you. I seem to bring all the
    nuts and screwballs out of the woodwork and any post I contribute to will
    get downright contentious - to say the least.

    The main thing to keep in mind is that the world is reading what we are
    writing to one another and the world can add their two cents worth to the
    ongoing conversation. Because this is the way a newsgroup works, it is
    essential to add context and references every inch of the way, not so much
    for our benefit, but for the benefit of others who may be reading the
    message. Very many readers are NOT reading what has come before. To get a
    perfect picture of what our posts look like to others, you have to go to the
    Google web page and see how they are displayed there. The newsreaders that
    you and I are using can be quite misleading.

    Quoted message said:

    When I first started on ng, it was frequent net etiquette to post only
    quote that portion of a comment that was necessary to understand the
    follow up in context.

    Have the readers changed so that this is no longer true? I have been
    away a while.



    No, the above is still true and will always be true. But bear in mind that
    it is always better to include too much of a previous message than too
    little. Whatever else others might say about me, they can never accuse me of
    editing a post to show myself only in a good light. So very many others do
    that here on ARBR that I am almost alone in my honesty.

    Quoted message said:

    I do apologize if I have confused you in any way. That was not my
    intention.



    This is why we men love women! Your sex is ever the soul of getting along
    and ameliorating differences. May you live a hundred years!

    --
    Regards,

    Ed Dolan - Minnesota

  11. "Just zis Guy, you know?" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On 27 Jun 2004 11:55:18 -0700, [email hidden]
    (Melanie) wrote in message
    <[email hidden]>:

    Quoted message said:

    My newsgroup reader gives me the whole thread. I can easily see what
    went before, and I don't need to read it again, in fact, to me that is
    a waste of bandwidth.

    "waste of bandwidth" is as good a description of Mr Ed as you will be
    needing :-)

    These little side comments of Guy's are getting tiresome. But I suppose that
    is what one does when one has nothing of substance to contribute. I note
    that Mr. Sherman is doing this sort of thing more and more of late too.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    When I first started on ng, it was frequent net etiquette to post only
    quote that portion of a comment that was necessary to understand the
    follow up in context.

    Is still correct usage in my book.

    Of course it is. How else is anyone going to know what is being said. But
    you, along with many others here, edit me too severely. You do not include
    enough of what I have said in my message to be fair to me. You need to be
    less concerned about putting yourself in good light and more concerned about
    being honest to your correspondent. Follow my example!

    --
    Ed Dolan - Minnesota

  12. n0 1

    Doofus begged:

    Quoted message said:

    Follow my example!

  13. "bil" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:FkLDc.1930$151.1073@fed1read02...

    Quoted message said:


    n0 1

    Doofus begged:

    Quoted message said:

    Follow my example!

    That was not a suggestion where Guy or you are concerned, but more like an
    order - which is all you two bozos understand.

    But I see you are continuing to top post. And editing too severely. Back to
    school with you - blockhead! But then, no one reads you except me so maybe
    it doesn't matter!

    --
    Ed Dolan - Minnesota

  14. Ed, you wrote:

    You are effecting a letter writing style as opposed to a newsgroup
    posting
    style.

    Reply:

    No, on many ng, the "style" you referred to is actually a rule. Its
    certainly something unique to the internet, to assist individuals with
    lower end computers, or who are very busy and have very little time,
    to be able to participate in a discussion.

    The fact that some ng readers don't do their homework and don't read
    to inform themselves shouldn't cause disrespect for the vast majority
    who do Ed. I do hear in this that you think I edited you too much.
    So I'll try and include a little more of what I am responding to so
    you won't be so lost.

    Ed, you also wrote:
    But you are not contentious like I am and so others are not jumping
    in on your messages and taking issue with everything you say.

    Reply:

    Some of what you say Ed doesn't have anything to do with bent bikes,
    and that is why this NG exists. Everybody has political opinions of
    one kind or another, but I personally don't think they belong here.
    Nor do personal insults, because as you say "Everyone is reading what
    we say". (well probably not, many NG readers either stop reading or
    participating in a news group full of off topic posts, spam or flame
    wars. Why do you think so many regulars left the newsgroup?)

    You wrote: "I am the opposite of you. "

    No, Ed, I think you WANT to be opposite of EVERYONE to get them to
    respond to you-- watching your posts over the years, I hypothesize you
    go outside the rules and etiquette because you want attention.
    Perhaps you are lonely and this is the only way to get attention so
    folks will respond to you-- let you know that you matter, and that you
    are thought about...."

    The thing is Ed, you do matter, even if you were to stay on topic and
    try and think about the majority of readers who do read your posts.
    You have so much to contribute from your life experience, your rides,
    and your bikes. You have wisdom.

    But it gets lost when in setting out to deliberately inflame people.
    You lose your ability to persuade, to get respect and change lives and
    minds, when you set up to be deliberately off topic and contrarian all
    the time.

    I don't think its a gender thing: I think it goes to maturity, and
    the patience to be open minded and respectful.

    OTOH, I have heard that extreme exercise can bring extremely high
    levels of testosterone, and this can make man or woman extremely
    aggressive and disagreeable.

    Maybe its a hormonal thing. Perhaps rest would help you?

    You too could be peacemaker, and maybe even persuade folks that you
    are right, that is if you wanted to...

    Its up to you I suppose. If you did that, even more people would
    listen to you Ed. Why not share one of your great ride stories with
    us?

    All the best Ed,

    Keep riding....😉

    Melanie

  15. Melanie:

    As a general rule I top post, although if it's in direct response to
    something in the thread I usually quote that. That's a form or procedure
    that's often used on web forums where bandwidth *is* an issue. It's also
    used in email listserves, and has become something of a necessity in the
    blogging world, where it goes under the name "fisking." Often, if I'm in a
    hurry I simply don't read a messasge that isn't top posted, because it takes
    too long to scroll to something that might not be interesting anyway. If
    you can easily see a response, or at least a quote that the author considers
    important, it's easy to decide whether you want to read more.

    Trolls hate top posting, for some reason. Well, they hate a lot of stuff,
    including themselves.

    --
    --Scott
    "Melanie" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Ed, you wrote:

    You are effecting a letter writing style as opposed to a newsgroup
    posting
    style.

    Reply:

    No, on many ng, the "style" you referred to is actually a rule. Its
    certainly something unique to the internet, to assist individuals with
    lower end computers, or who are very busy and have very little time,
    to be able to participate in a discussion.

    The fact that some ng readers don't do their homework and don't read
    to inform themselves shouldn't cause disrespect for the vast majority
    who do Ed. I do hear in this that you think I edited you too much.
    So I'll try and include a little more of what I am responding to so
    you won't be so lost.

    Ed, you also wrote:
    But you are not contentious like I am and so others are not jumping
    in on your messages and taking issue with everything you say.

    Reply:

    Some of what you say Ed doesn't have anything to do with bent bikes,
    and that is why this NG exists. Everybody has political opinions of
    one kind or another, but I personally don't think they belong here.
    Nor do personal insults, because as you say "Everyone is reading what
    we say". (well probably not, many NG readers either stop reading or
    participating in a news group full of off topic posts, spam or flame
    wars. Why do you think so many regulars left the newsgroup?)

    You wrote: "I am the opposite of you. "

    No, Ed, I think you WANT to be opposite of EVERYONE to get them to
    respond to you-- watching your posts over the years, I hypothesize you
    go outside the rules and etiquette because you want attention.
    Perhaps you are lonely and this is the only way to get attention so
    folks will respond to you-- let you know that you matter, and that you
    are thought about...."

    The thing is Ed, you do matter, even if you were to stay on topic and
    try and think about the majority of readers who do read your posts.
    You have so much to contribute from your life experience, your rides,
    and your bikes. You have wisdom.

    But it gets lost when in setting out to deliberately inflame people.
    You lose your ability to persuade, to get respect and change lives and
    minds, when you set up to be deliberately off topic and contrarian all
    the time.

    I don't think its a gender thing: I think it goes to maturity, and
    the patience to be open minded and respectful.

    OTOH, I have heard that extreme exercise can bring extremely high
    levels of testosterone, and this can make man or woman extremely
    aggressive and disagreeable.

    Maybe its a hormonal thing. Perhaps rest would help you?

    You too could be peacemaker, and maybe even persuade folks that you
    are right, that is if you wanted to...

    Its up to you I suppose. If you did that, even more people would
    listen to you Ed. Why not share one of your great ride stories with
    us?

    All the best Ed,

    Keep riding....😉

    Melanie

  16. "Melanie" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Ed, you wrote:

    You are effecting a letter writing style as opposed to a newsgroup
    posting
    style.

    Reply:

    No, on many ng, the "style" you referred to is actually a rule. Its
    certainly something unique to the internet, to assist individuals with
    lower end computers, or who are very busy and have very little time,
    to be able to participate in a discussion.

    Yes, newsgroup posting is all about rules, which I observe and you don't.

    Quoted message said:

    The fact that some ng readers don't do their homework and don't read
    to inform themselves shouldn't cause disrespect for the vast majority
    who do Ed. I do hear in this that you think I edited you too much.
    So I'll try and include a little more of what I am responding to so
    you won't be so lost.

    You do not edit me at all. In fact, you do not include anything of what I
    have said (except previously for one very brief snippet). You respond as if
    I had written you a letter, which I haven't (I assure you, a letter would
    be vastly different than a posting). I have written you a newsgroup posting
    which I know the whole world is going to read along with you. My main
    concern is always for the universe of anonymous readers, not for the
    particular correspondent to whom I am responding. I think that is the main
    difference between what you are doing and what I am doing.

    Quoted message said:

    Ed, you also wrote:
    But you are not contentious like I am and so others are not jumping
    in on your messages and taking issue with everything you say.

    Reply:

    Some of what you say Ed doesn't have anything to do with bent bikes,
    and that is why this NG exists. Everybody has political opinions of
    one kind or another, but I personally don't think they belong here.
    Nor do personal insults, because as you say "Everyone is reading what
    we say". (well probably not, many NG readers either stop reading or
    participating in a news group full of off topic posts, spam or flame
    wars. Why do you think so many regulars left the newsgroup?)

    A conversation will go the way it will go and those who do not like the way
    it is going can leave the conversation and if they want to leave the
    newsgroup, that is just fine with me too. We are well rid of the "regulars"
    that were formerely here. They had outworn any welcome they ever had here
    and were getting downright incestous in their postings. The newsgroup is a
    far better place for their having left.

    Quoted message said:

    You wrote: "I am the opposite of you. "

    No, Ed, I think you WANT to be opposite of EVERYONE to get them to
    respond to you-- watching your posts over the years, I hypothesize you
    go outside the rules and etiquette because you want attention.
    Perhaps you are lonely and this is the only way to get attention so
    folks will respond to you-- let you know that you matter, and that you
    are thought about...."

    Actually, I do disagree with most on this newsgroup about most things. But I
    do not mind being contentious and disagreeable, most especially when it
    comes to politics. I have noted that no one is ever trying to be friendly to
    me, so why should I bother with them in that regard. No, I like argument and
    I enjoy controversy. I wish it could all be on a higher level, but I am
    willing to get down in the trenches with the majority of low life to be
    found here on ARBR.

    Quoted message said:

    The thing is Ed, you do matter, even if you were to stay on topic and
    try and think about the majority of readers who do read your posts.
    You have so much to contribute from your life experience, your rides,
    and your bikes. You have wisdom.

    Ah, sweet amelioration! But you are one in million. I am having to deal with
    blooming idiots of the first rank. But it is nothing but fun and games for
    me and when I tire of it I will leave and go on to other things.

    Quoted message said:

    But it gets lost when in setting out to deliberately inflame people.
    You lose your ability to persuade, to get respect and change lives and
    minds, when you set up to be deliberately off topic and contrarian all
    the time.

    I am not really trying to persuade anyone of anything. That is for the
    young. I only began posting to this group in the first place because of all
    the liberal cant and hypocrisy that I detected here. And then there were
    the Bush bashers whose only aim in life was to bash Bush. My role here is
    limited and I am content to play out the hand I have been dealt.

    Quoted message said:

    I don't think its a gender thing: I think it goes to maturity, and
    the patience to be open minded and respectful.

    It has ever been one of the interests in my life to see how different men
    and women are from one another. Gender explains an awful lot. We men are
    killers and women are not. They are concerned with new life almost to the
    exclusion of everything else. We men only pretend to be concerned with new
    life. But we are killers and we all know it.

    Quoted message said:

    OTOH, I have heard that extreme exercise can bring extremely high
    levels of testosterone, and this can make man or woman extremely
    aggressive and disagreeable.

    Women athletes are highly abnormal and most likely have a hormonal
    imbalance. Many woman athletes look more like men than some men do

    Quoted message said:

    Maybe its a hormonal thing. Perhaps rest would help you?

    I will soon be resting in my grave for all eternity.

    Quoted message said:

    You too could be peacemaker, and maybe even persuade folks that you
    are right, that is if you wanted to...

    Nope, not interested!

    Quoted message said:

    Its up to you I suppose. If you did that, even more people would
    listen to you Ed. Why not share one of your great ride stories with
    us?

    I am here for off-topic only to keep ARBR cleansed of dirty rotten liberal
    posts. I would rather rule in Hell with Mr. Sherman than serve in Heaven
    with you! See what I mean about us men being killers?

    Quoted message said:

    All the best Ed,

    Same to you kiddo!

    --
    Best Regards,

    Ed Dolan - Minnesota

  17. "Freewheeling" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Melanie:

    As a general rule I top post, although if it's in direct response to
    something in the thread I usually quote that. That's a form or procedure
    that's often used on web forums where bandwidth *is* an issue. It's also
    used in email listserves, and has become something of a necessity in the
    blogging world, where it goes under the name "fisking." Often, if I'm in


    a

    Quoted message said:

    hurry I simply don't read a messasge that isn't top posted, because it


    takes

    Quoted message said:

    too long to scroll to something that might not be interesting anyway. If
    you can easily see a response, or at least a quote that the author


    considers

    Quoted message said:

    important, it's easy to decide whether you want to read more.

    Trolls hate top posting, for some reason. Well, they hate a lot of stuff,
    including themselves.

    --
    --Scott

    Everything Scott says above is highly academic because he takes the
    precaution of bottom posting the ENTIRE previous post to which he is
    responding. It is hard do find fault with this method as everything is there
    for context. Nonetheless, I do not believe top posting is any more
    efficacious than bottom posting.

    Take the present post for instance. Unless I have been following this thread
    I will have to read the previous message in its entirely down below in order
    to know fully what is being discussed. Scott should have posted Melanie's
    first paragraph at the top of his post so that we wouldn't have to read
    down to find out what it is that he is responding to. There is no such thing
    as a direct response on a newsgroup unless it is just idle chit chat. One
    must always consider other readers and how they are understanding what is
    being said.

    One final thought, maybe if you are in such a god awful hurry to get on with
    other things you should forget about newsgroups altogether. I must admit
    they do take some time and I have not found any shortcuts.

    --
    Ed Dolan - Minnesota

    Quoted message said:

    "Melanie" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Ed, you wrote:

    You are effecting a letter writing style as opposed to a newsgroup
    posting
    style.

    Reply:

    No, on many ng, the "style" you referred to is actually a rule. Its
    certainly something unique to the internet, to assist individuals with
    lower end computers, or who are very busy and have very little time,
    to be able to participate in a discussion.

    The fact that some ng readers don't do their homework and don't read
    to inform themselves shouldn't cause disrespect for the vast majority
    who do Ed. I do hear in this that you think I edited you too much.
    So I'll try and include a little more of what I am responding to so
    you won't be so lost.

    Ed, you also wrote:
    But you are not contentious like I am and so others are not jumping
    in on your messages and taking issue with everything you say.

    Reply:

    Some of what you say Ed doesn't have anything to do with bent bikes,
    and that is why this NG exists. Everybody has political opinions of
    one kind or another, but I personally don't think they belong here.
    Nor do personal insults, because as you say "Everyone is reading what
    we say". (well probably not, many NG readers either stop reading or
    participating in a news group full of off topic posts, spam or flame
    wars. Why do you think so many regulars left the newsgroup?)

    You wrote: "I am the opposite of you. "

    No, Ed, I think you WANT to be opposite of EVERYONE to get them to
    respond to you-- watching your posts over the years, I hypothesize you
    go outside the rules and etiquette because you want attention.
    Perhaps you are lonely and this is the only way to get attention so
    folks will respond to you-- let you know that you matter, and that you
    are thought about...."

    The thing is Ed, you do matter, even if you were to stay on topic and
    try and think about the majority of readers who do read your posts.
    You have so much to contribute from your life experience, your rides,
    and your bikes. You have wisdom.

    But it gets lost when in setting out to deliberately inflame people.
    You lose your ability to persuade, to get respect and change lives and
    minds, when you set up to be deliberately off topic and contrarian all
    the time.

    I don't think its a gender thing: I think it goes to maturity, and
    the patience to be open minded and respectful.

    OTOH, I have heard that extreme exercise can bring extremely high
    levels of testosterone, and this can make man or woman extremely
    aggressive and disagreeable.

    Maybe its a hormonal thing. Perhaps rest would help you?

    You too could be peacemaker, and maybe even persuade folks that you
    are right, that is if you wanted to...

    Its up to you I suppose. If you did that, even more people would
    listen to you Ed. Why not share one of your great ride stories with
    us?

    All the best Ed,

    Keep riding....😉

    Melanie

  18. wrong 100%, AGAIN...

    newsgroups were created to be
    agents of chaos

    Doofus grovellingly snivelled:

    Quoted message said:

    Yes, newsgroup posting is all about rules, which I observe and you don't.

  19. "bil" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:zZ7Ec.3402$151.1224@fed1read02...

    Quoted message said:

    wrong 100%, AGAIN...

    newsgroups were created to be
    agents of chaos

    Doofus grovellingly snivelled:

    Quoted message said:

    Yes, newsgroup posting is all about rules, which I observe and you


    don't.

    I think at long last I do agree with bil about something. Ever since I came
    on this newsgroup my brains have been scrambled and I can't seem to keep to
    a coherent thought anymore. I blame Mr. Sherman for all my troubles in this
    regard. He was put here by the Devil for the sole purpose of driving me
    stark raving mad.

    And then there are the gadflies like this bil character who keeps circling
    me like a vulture. A grand tragedy is being played out here to a chorus of
    idiots. The Lilliputians are tying the one great intellect of this newsgroup
    to the ground. That would be me of course. But beware one and all, oh you of
    the minutiae - giants like myself can rise from the grave to smite you and
    sweep you from ARBR like the pestiferous insects that you are.

    --
    Ed Dolan - Minnesota

  20. again......
    that would explain a lot
    ;-)

    Quoted message said:

    ants like myself can rise from the grave

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.