UK and Europe · Public discussion

Quiet, but ..

Started by Nick Kew · · Last activity · 16 posts · 639 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
25 December 2006
Last activity
3 January 2007
Original author
Nick Kew
Posts
16
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
639
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–16 of 16
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Took a brief spin between about 1:15 and 3 today, on the assumption
    that most of the zombies would be stuffing themselves. About half
    of it on-road, and indeed very little traffic.

    One seasonal incident: a clearly-erratic car approaches from behind.
    I hear it some way off, and go off-road (which is a perfectly
    sensible option at that point - it's open moor). Car reaches
    same point and bounces off the road too, but fortunately doesn't
    get very far.

    But where's the fresh air? Dartmoor is covered in the smog
    of bonfires and domestic fires. Bah, humbug.

    --
    not me guv

  2. Nick Kew of The Holy Book of the Great Bludner said:

    Took a brief spin between about 1:15 and 3 today, on the assumption
    that most of the zombies would be stuffing themselves.


    Snap.

    Quoted message said:

    indeed very little traffic.


    Snap again. Just for the hell of it I cycled down a dual carriageway that
    normally I'd avoid. Surprisingly the only motorists I met were driving
    quite normally. About half the traffic was taxis! Met a couple of little
    kids on obviously new bikes. One poor little guy was on a bike rather too
    big for him. On seeing me come towards him down an empty street with loads
    of room he panicked, went left then right and fell off. I felt horribly
    guilty.
    --
    Steph Peters
    Chorlton Wanderers Cycling Group
    Monthly slow and easy rides from South Manchester
    http://www.sandbenders.demon.co.uk/cycling/chwan.htm

  3. Steph Peters said:
    Nick Kew of The Holy Book of the Great Bludner said:

    Took a brief spin between about 1:15 and 3 today, on the assumption
    that most of the zombies would be stuffing themselves.


    Snap.

    Quoted message said:

    indeed very little traffic.


    I was on afternoon shift. The traffic was light, but there was much
    more glass on the roads and the bits of cycle tracks I use than normal.
    You can sure tell that the council are on holiday!
    Simon Mason

  4. On 25/12/2006 22:11, Steph Peters said,

    Quoted message said:

    One poor little guy was on a bike rather too
    big for him.

    I saw a few of those out on my travels over Christmas, in one case with
    a parent shouting at the kid to ride the bike properly. Why do shops
    sell bikes that are obviously far too big for the kids? Surely all it
    will do is put them off cycling when they find they can't ride the bike
    properly.

    Bah, humbug!!!

    --
    Paul Boyd
    http://www.paul-boyd.co.uk/

  5. Paul Boyd said:

    On 25/12/2006 22:11, Steph Peters said,

    Quoted message said:

    One poor little guy was on a bike rather too
    big for him.

    I saw a few of those out on my travels over Christmas, in one case
    with a parent shouting at the kid to ride the bike properly. Why do
    shops sell bikes that are obviously far too big for the kids?
    Surely all it will do is put them off cycling when they find they
    can't ride the bike properly.

    I guess parents don't take kids to a bike shop to size it properly cos
    it'd ruin the surprise on the big day.

    Chris
    --
    Chris Eilbeck

  6. Chris Eilbeck twisted the electrons to say:

    Quoted message said:

    I guess parents don't take kids to a bike shop to size it properly cos
    it'd ruin the surprise on the big day.

    .... besides which "they'll grow into it" surely? <shrugs>
    --
    These opinions might not even be mine ...
    Let alone connected with my employer ...

  7. Alan Holmes said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    One poor little guy was on a bike rather too
    big for him.

    I saw a few of those out on my travels over Christmas, in one case with a
    parent shouting at the kid to ride the bike properly. Why do shops sell
    bikes that are obviously far too big for the kids? Surely all it will do
    is put them off cycling when they find they can't ride the bike properly.

    You are not aware that kids grow very quickly, so if the bike was too big
    when it was bought, it would still be usable in acouple of years.

    But if it was "too big" then it might not have been usable right now!

    Judith

  8. "Paul Boyd" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On 25/12/2006 22:11, Steph Peters said,

    Quoted message said:

    One poor little guy was on a bike rather too
    big for him.

    I saw a few of those out on my travels over Christmas, in one case with a
    parent shouting at the kid to ride the bike properly. Why do shops sell
    bikes that are obviously far too big for the kids? Surely all it will do
    is put them off cycling when they find they can't ride the bike properly.

    You are not aware that kids grow very quickly, so if the bike was too big
    when it was bought, it would still be usable in acouple of years.

    Alan

    Quoted message said:


    Bah, humbug!!!

    --
    Paul Boyd
    http://www.paul-boyd.co.uk/

  9. On 28/12/2006 22:24, Alan Holmes said,

    Quoted message said:

    You are not aware that kids grow very quickly, so if the bike was too big
    when it was bought, it would still be usable in acouple of years.

    Yes, but in a couple of years they've lost interest because they can't
    ride the thing NOW.

    --
    Paul Boyd
    http://www.paul-boyd.co.uk/

  10. "Judith" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Alan Holmes said:
    Quoted message said:

    > One poor little guy was on a bike rather too
    > big for him.

    I saw a few of those out on my travels over Christmas, in one case with
    a
    parent shouting at the kid to ride the bike properly. Why do shops sell
    bikes that are obviously far too big for the kids? Surely all it will
    do
    is put them off cycling when they find they can't ride the bike
    properly.

    You are not aware that kids grow very quickly, so if the bike was too big
    when it was bought, it would still be usable in acouple of years.

    But if it was "too big" then it might not have been usable right now!

    But we don't know exactly how big it was, if the child could have used it
    without sitting on the sadle, they would still have been able to cycle on
    it.

    Quoted message said:


    Judith

  11. On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 19:55:04 +0000

    Paul Boyd said:

    On 25/12/2006 22:11, Steph Peters said,

    Quoted message said:

    One poor little guy was on a bike rather too
    big for him.

    I saw a few of those out on my travels over Christmas, in one case
    with a parent shouting at the kid to ride the bike properly. Why do
    shops sell bikes that are obviously far too big for the kids? Surely
    all it will do is put them off cycling when they find they can't ride
    the bike properly.

    I started on adult bikes belonging to family members.
    Didn't do me no 'arm. Mind you, I didn't have parents
    being annoying - bike was far too energetic for them.

    --
    not me guv

  12. Paul Boyd of Zen Internet said:

    On 25/12/2006 22:11, Steph Peters said,

    Quoted message said:

    One poor little guy was on a bike rather too
    big for him.

    I saw a few of those out on my travels over Christmas, in one case with
    a parent shouting at the kid to ride the bike properly. Why do shops
    sell bikes that are obviously far too big for the kids? Surely all it
    will do is put them off cycling when they find they can't ride the bike
    properly.


    I suspect a lot of these bikes weren't from bike shops, but from places
    where they are supplied not fully assembled.

    Today there were more kids around on new looking bikes, and there weren't
    any obviously far too big.
    --
    Steph Peters
    Chorlton Wanderers Cycling Group
    Monthly slow and easy rides from South Manchester
    http://www.sandbenders.demon.co.uk/cycling/chwan.htm

  13. In article <[email hidden]>

    Paul Boyd said:

    On 25/12/2006 22:11, Steph Peters said,

    Quoted message said:

    One poor little guy was on a bike rather too
    big for him.

    I saw a few of those out on my travels over Christmas, in one case with
    a parent shouting at the kid to ride the bike properly. Why do shops
    sell bikes that are obviously far too big for the kids?

    Not just kids, but at least adults have only themselves to blame when
    they buy something that doesn't fit. I always tried to sell kids bikes
    that were small enough to be safe and comfortable but big enough to last
    a while - I probably lost a few sales when parents insisted on buying a
    bike that was too big, by telling them that I thought it could be
    dangerous, but hey I'm a mechanic not a salesman. :-) With some
    parents there seems to be status to be gained from putting little Johnny
    on a "full size bike" when he'd be much better off on something smaller.

    Quoted message said:

    Surely all it
    will do is put them off cycling when they find they can't ride the bike
    properly.

    That was one of the arguments I'd use, but they often wouldn't listen.

    Quoted message said:


    Bah, humbug!!!


    Indeed.

  14. Rob Morley said:

    In article <[email hidden]>

    Paul Boyd said:

    Surely all it
    will do is put them off cycling when they find they can't ride the
    bike properly.

    That was one of the arguments I'd use, but they often wouldn't listen.

    That's assuming that (all) non-cycling parents actually want their children
    to ride their bikes. It's just as likely that they want the feeling of
    providing lots of nice stuff for their kids.

    After all, if the child's actually using their bike, then surely they'll get
    immediately snatched by an evil pervert (TM News of the World)

    A

  15. Ambrose Nankivell wrote on 03/01/2007 16:48 +0100:

    Quoted message said:


    After all, if the child's actually using their bike, then surely they'll get
    immediately snatched by an evil pervert (TM News of the World)

    Yep they need to watch out for being got by Fat Eric and the Cookie Monster

    --
    Tony

    "...has many omissions and contains much that is apocryphal, or at least
    wildly inaccurate..."
    Douglas Adams; The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

  16. In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:
    Rob Morley said:

    In article <[email hidden]>

    Paul Boyd said:

    Surely all it
    will do is put them off cycling when they find they can't ride the
    bike properly.

    That was one of the arguments I'd use, but they often wouldn't listen.

    That's assuming that (all) non-cycling parents actually want their children
    to ride their bikes. It's just as likely that they want the feeling of
    providing lots of nice stuff for their kids.


    Much better to buy them a flash bike they'll never use than to spend a
    few hours of quality time with them fixing up an old bike, or going
    cycling with them ...

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.