Bike Cafe · Public discussion

Question from a non biker

Started by erikhaha · · Last activity · 37 posts · 2,947 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Bike Cafe
Published
17 September 2007
Last activity
26 September 2007
Original author
erikhaha
Posts
37
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,947
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 37
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I have been curious about this for a long time. As someone that does not roadrace or bike, except to get from point A to B, I have often wondered why people wear those tight spandex suits when they are riding. I realize that DURING A RACE they reduce drag, but why wear them when you are just exercising?

    It wasn't until Lance Armstrong started getting popular that all these followers wanted to be a rider, they went down to the local bike store bought a bike and all the accesocies that will make them look the part. Now you see these asshats everywhere, and the worst part about it is you can tell that 80% of them are not even putting out when they are riding. Another thing, if you are not putting out and trying to get better and faster and you just ride for leisure fine, but tell me why do you wear those tight spandex?

    Curious person

  2. We're all gay. You've found us out.

    I hope nobody mentions the leg shaving...

    😉

  3. Go and ride 80kms in a pair of "normal" shorts and you'll know the answer

  4. erikhaha said:

    I have been curious about this for a long time. As someone that does not road race or bike, except to get from point A to B, I have often wondered why people wear those tight spandex suits when they are riding. I realize that DURING A RACE they reduce drag, but why wear them when you are just exercising?

    It wasn't until Lance Armstrong started getting popular that all these followers wanted to be a rider, they went down to the local bike store bought a bike and all the accessories that will make them look the part. Now you see these asshats everywhere, and the worst part about it is you can tell that 80% of them are not even putting out when they are riding. Another thing, if you are not putting out and trying to get better and faster and you just ride for leisure fine, but tell me why do you wear those tight spandex?

    Curious person


    1. Even if you are just exercising with no competitive goal in mind, wind drag will take a lot of the fun out of bicycling. Clothes made for bicycling--not all of which is made of 'spandex' by the way--cut down wind drag, allowing one to pedal more easily at a comfortable rate. Bicyclists should push ('crank'😉the pedals at somewhere between 60 and 80 rpms for optimal form; less than that and they risk straining their joints and muscles. Much more than that is beyond the sustained aerobic ability of most 'casual' bicyclists. Clothes that don't impede that cranking rate are a big advantage.

    2. If you are putting 10 or 15 miles on a bike several times a week, in an effort to exercise, you need clothes that allow you a range of motion appropriate to your activity. It's the same reason that 'amateur' football players, who play for a neighborhood or church team, nevertheless invest in jerseys, helmets, shoulder pads, etcetera. Cycling clothes not only provide less wind drag, they also let you perspire in a way that keeps you cool; winter cycling clothes are specifically designed to minimize heat loss. Cycling shorts also are often padded, which prevents saddle-soreness and injuries to the genital area. Street clothes can restrict your motion, cause chafing, and may not be suitably cool or warm for extended rides.

    3. Cycling is a social activity and there is some degree of 'cliquishness' that encourages regular, active participants to dress similarly. Nothing wrong with that: golfers, baseball players, bingo enthusiasts, and garden club members also often do or wear things that identify themselves as part of a group.

    4. To some extent you are simply overgeneralizing. I see lots of bike riders--some who ride every day as their primary mode of transport--who dress in essentially what are normal street clothes. Others just wear gym shorts and a tee shirt. I suspect you are 'seeing' the bicyclists in spandex more readily because you were convinced that 'spandex' is more of an affectation than a practical form of attire. As I pointed out above, 'spandex' serves more than one purpose. And if you go to books on bicycling dating back into the 60's and 70's, when bicycling for health first became popular, you will find that cycling clothes were fashionable even before Lance Armstrong hit the scene.

  5. erikhaha said:

    I have been curious about this for a long time. As someone that does not roadrace or bike, except to get from point A to B, I have often wondered why people wear those tight spandex suits when they are riding. I realize that DURING A RACE they reduce drag, but why wear them when you are just exercising?

    It wasn't until Lance Armstrong started getting popular that all these followers wanted to be a rider, they went down to the local bike store bought a bike and all the accesocies that will make them look the part. Now you see these asshats everywhere, and the worst part about it is you can tell that 80% of them are not even putting out when they are riding. Another thing, if you are not putting out and trying to get better and faster and you just ride for leisure fine, but tell me why do you wear those tight spandex?

    Curious person

    I wear them because they really show off my tight, shapely glutes, and I dream of the day that some buff stud like you notices.

    Are you a top or bottom?

  6. Well put Janie! I wear padded "spandex" shorts for the comfort above all, but a proper top & bottoms help with perspiration too!

    janiejones said:

    Go and ride 80kms in a pair of "normal" shorts and you'll know the answer

  7. i think the guy is just being a troll and trying to knock our sport...lets burn him at the stake! 😄

    seriously man, i only see tight shorts around me. yes the jerseys are tighter, but they arnt skin tight unless your in a time trial or triathlon. the lycra shorts cyclists wear have padding in them to help keep tender areas from getting sore on long rides. and they work excellently i may add. The shorts also act like compression shorts for running and keep your muscles warm so they dont cramp up...

    maybe YOU are just turned on in some weird way by the male cyclists going by. If thats the case sorry i already have a beautiful girlfriend (and she was born a girl) and she will tell ya im straight...ya sick ****

    and who out there is a follower? ive been riding bikes WAY before i even knew of lance armstrong. yes, lance has made me appreciate life more because of what he has gone through and what he has accomplished, but i was already a cyclist. Of course I used to ride mostly mountain bike but i had trails then. Now all i have is roads, so of course i bought a road bike. Are you just jealous because your some fat a$$ that sits behind his computer all day doing nothing? or maybe you have tried cycling and couldnt keep up with a few 80 year olds out riding their single speed cruisers? ive been seeing cyclists in my area since i was a kid, dressed in lycra and everything.

    one thing you didnt mention, all the ones wearing lycra also seem to wear helmets. making them smarter than a lot of people just riding around in shorts and t-shirts...

  8. mongooseboy said:

    i think the guy is just being a troll and trying to knock our sport...lets burn him at the stake! 😄

    . . . .


    So far all he's done is ask a question. Not an entirely respectful question, but not an overtly trollish question. Give him the benefit of the doubt that he really doesn't know. If he comes back with a trollish response, then 'burn' him. Some of the active bicyclists on this forum--I believe--have commented on the ugliness of traditional bicycling clothes. Or more specifically, the way they DON'T flatter the average form of the average bicyclist. Unlike 'alienator',

    alienator said:

    I wear them because they really show off my tight, shapely glutes . . . .

    most of us on bikes, straight, gay, bi, or celibate, aren't really much to look at. I can laugh 'with' a non-bicyclist who is sincerely wanting to know why all of us with bulges and sags in all the wrong places choose to so prominently display our physical flaws.

    Besides, a dignified answer is much more of a rebuke to a troll than a sarcastic one. And bicycling isn't, of itself, a 'sport', which is a competitive form of activivty. Not all of us are in this to compete with anyone.

  9. flameburns623 said:

    4. To some extent you are simply overgeneralizing. I see lots of bike riders--some who ride every day as their primary mode of transport--who dress in essentially what are normal street clothes. Others just wear gym shorts and a tee shirt. I suspect you are 'seeing' the bicyclists in spandex more readily because you were convinced that 'spandex' is more of an affectation than a practical form of attire. As I pointed out above, 'spandex' serves more than one purpose. And if you go to books on bicycling dating back into the 60's and 70's, when bicycling for health first became popular, you will find that cycling clothes were fashionable even before Lance Armstrong hit the scene.

    Amen on this. I don't really understand the whole "spandex" deal either, but in my area the majority of riders I see are wearing basic workout clothes. Shorts and Ts.

    And all the ones who are decked out in the bibs, etc are moving faster than I am so I can't say [censored]. 😄

    Especially this one young lady. Damn does she look good in that kind of outfit. And she's ridden past me a few times like I was standing still.

  10. You sound like a stupid [censored] red neck. To put it simply so your inbred brain can understand it, Try chasing one of your chickens around while wearing cowboy boots, with no socks, for about an hour. Then, If you do catch the bird, try just putting it down this time.

  11. Freehub said:

    You sound like a stupid [censored] red neck. To put it simply so your inbred brain can understand it, Try chasing one of your chickens around while wearing cowboy boots, with no socks, for about an hour. Then, If you do catch the bird, try just putting it down this time.

    Yo' put th' chicken down af'er yo' ketch him ?? Wal Hell son, whut in tarnation fun is thet ?

    😉

  12. Why? 'Cause they're extremely comfortable. Nothing flapping in the breeze, nothing rubbing where it shouldn't be. Put in 50 or 60 miles, and you'll see why - regular shorts leave you sore in unmentionable places.

    I will admit, it takes a bit of getting used to. It's another reason to get in good shape - you don't want to look completely absurd.

  13. and hey - some of us actually do race, even if we don't get paid to do it. Do you expect us to train (practice) in our street clothes.

  14. I don't wear them cause armstrong wore them, I can't stand armstrong, I wear them for comfort, less drag, they keep me cool, and so nuthin gets caught in my chain. there probably more reasons, but I forgot em...

  15. You have asked a good question Erikhaha. flameburns623 has all the right answers but left one out. We get noticed when we wear these clothes! It is really a good thing when a motorist notices you when you are on a bike. It can be downright dangerous if a motorist does not notice you.

    In an effort to better understand what we are all talking about, why don't you give riding a try? Contact a local club and borrow a bike if you don't have one. BTW, you don't have to wear the tight shorts. I have several pair that have the tight shorts as a pair of underwear with regular shorts over them. Of course I am a little older than most of the people in this forum and I look really strange in a pair of tight cycling shorts.

  16. Thanks flameburns. Kdelong, I have no real interest in riding. I have mountainbiked in the past and it was not that fun to me. I just surf, since I live in california.

    Ya I must have seemed a little sarcastic in my post but it pisses me off when they clog the main street here every weekend, especially when the weather is good. I guess it is like any sport or activity, there will always bee posers amongst a group. I just seems to me that if you wanted to ride, why choose a major road through town when there are prently of traffic free roads close by.

    I also realize that this is not always the case but I am talking about groups of riders and not individual riders. Oh well thanks anyway.

  17. kdelong said:

    You have asked a good question Erikhaha. flameburns623 has all the right answers but left one out. We get noticed when we wear these clothes! It is really a good thing when a motorist notices you when you are on a bike. It can be downright dangerous if a motorist does not notice you . . . .


    I hate the garishness of a lot of the bicycle clothes I see and I don't want to be a billboard for either the clothing manufacturer or whatever else someone chooses to emblazon on something. I refuse to pay the inflated prices that LBS and small sporting-goods store charge for clothes. I bought simple, cheap stuff from Wal-Mart, all of it in basic black, and wear an orange safety vest. Good enough. Hence my omission of the 'safety factor'. Henry Ford had the right idea. "Any color you like as long as it's black." Labels and brand names should be tucked away discreetly out-of-sight.

  18. erikhaha said:

    . . . Ya I must have seemed a little sarcastic in my post but it pisses me off when they clog the main street here every weekend, especially when the weather is good. I guess it is like any sport or activity, there will always bee posers amongst a group. I just seems to me that if you wanted to ride, why choose a major road through town when there are plenty of traffic free roads close by.

    I also realize that this is not always the case but I am talking about groups of riders and not individual riders. Oh well thanks anyway.


    You're gonna get snowed-under with negative responses. Bicycles are legal vehicles with full rights to the road. They jam the roads far less than an equivalent number of cars would do, and create fewer negative byproducts. Bicycling advocates do give advice about cycling which includes choosing quieter roads with less traffic when possible; but that isn't always as easy as you might think if you aren't actually trying to get somewhere and aren't just riding for pleasure.

    I will concede that some bicyclists are profoundly rude. I've seen them recently in my own town, biking down the middle of a lane going AGAINST traffic, darting in front of vehicles without signalling, riding several abreast, etcetera. But I've also experienced some really really rude behavior by motorists who refuse to share the road. I'm sure you'll hear stories since you've raised the issue.

  19. erikhaha said:

    Thanks flameburns. Kdelong, I have no real interest in riding. I have mountainbiked in the past and it was not that fun to me. I just surf, since I live in california.

    Ya I must have seemed a little sarcastic in my post but it pisses me off when they clog the main street here every weekend, especially when the weather is good. I guess it is like any sport or activity, there will always bee posers amongst a group. I just seems to me that if you wanted to ride, why choose a major road through town when there are prently of traffic free roads close by.

    I also realize that this is not always the case but I am talking about groups of riders and not individual riders. Oh well thanks anyway.

    I'm betting that the side roads have more cracks and pot holes. It's no fun riding down a rough road, wiith all of shocks going into your wrists and butt. Also, who wants to ride by rows and rows of houses, when one can ride down the main street?

  20. Actually, I became a follower, when Greg Lemond started winning the TDF, not Lance. 😉
    It keeps stuff from shifting around, and as someone else said, sitin on that TINY seat for 4 or 5 hours at a time, will definitely wear a hole in you without some specific preventative measures.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.