OmManiPadmeOmelet wrote:
:: In article <[email hidden]>,
:: "Roger Zoul" <[email hidden]> wrote:
::
::: OmManiPadmeOmelet wrote:
::::: In article <[email hidden]>,
:: <snipped>
:::::
::::: But, back to my question, I understand why low carb works and the
::::: basic metabolic reasons why it does, but I don't really understand
::::: how and why
::::: fat fasting works. If it was just a matter of lowering calorie
::::: intake,
::::: then going down to zero calories and fasting should work even
::::: faster but remarkably, it does not. At least not in my personal
::::: experiences,
:::
::: Well, personally, I think straight fasting works better.
::
:: Personal experience? :-)
:: How long have you actually ever fasted for?
:: Just curiosity, not trying to argue.
just 36 hours....and not for the express purpose of losing weight, just for
mental discipline. But the reason I say I think fasting works better is
simply because I have held calories really low (under 1500) for several days
while exercising and I find I lose weight well - assuming I don't end up in
a binge.
::
::: But obviously
::: you're getting no nutrition. A fat fast will provide some. Not
::: many can do a straight fast for long, but you can survive better on
::: about 1000 kcals per day, for a certain length of time, as all that
::: fat results in slow digestion and won't stimulate much
::: appetite...you can also argument that it helps to avoid a
::: starvation response (ie, slowing down of the metabolism) if you
::: believe that jazz...
::
:: It also gives you bad breath due to the ketones. <lol>
::
:::
:::::
::::: I'm trying to understand the biochemistry behind it and was
::::: wondering if anyone knew?
::::: --
:::
::: I somehow don't think you're find a definitive answer..you may find
::: one that appeals to your way of thinking, however.
::
:: No, that's not what I'm wanting. Not at all!
::
:: Protein is converted to glucose and other nutrients in the liver by a
:: process called Gluconeogenesis. The body has to work harder to
:: convert
:: protein into glucose for energy rather than convering carb's into
:: energy
:: which is much easier for the body to do. This is why low carbing
:: appears
:: to work so very well for so many people.
?? Really? where did you learn this?
LCing works for a very simple reason.....it reduces BG swings in people who
have become IR....the cycles of low BG induced appetite disappear...and
people eat less food without feeling overly hungry. It really has little to
do with the body spending more energy converting protein to carbs.
::
:: It lowers serum lipid levels too.
::
For me it did, over time.
:: I was curious as to how and why a fat fast works as it's not just the
:: low calorie level at work here...
::
But it is mainly the low calorie level...because if you don't limit calories
you won't lose...
:: And for the record, it does NOT seem to lower serum lipid levels
:: like a
:: mostly protein diet does. At least not for me, but a single person is
:: hardly a scientific study. ;-)
Are you referring to the FF or LCing? If the latter, you have to give it
time...6 months to a year is typical, regardless of what Atkins said. My
numbers went up, then leveled back down.
::
:: I know better than that!
::
:: I'm wondering if anyone else has messed with Fat fasting and what
:: their results have been?
Some over in ASDLC have....ask there.
:: --
:: Om.
::
:: "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-[censored]."
:: -Jack Nicholson