Road Cycling · Public discussion

question for the scientists...

Started by yeahyeah · · Last activity · 28 posts · 731 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
15 March 2006
Last activity
20 March 2006
Original author
yeahyeah
Posts
28
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
731
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–28 of 28
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Dans le message de news:[email hidden],
    Curtis L. Russell <[email hidden]> a réfléchi, et puis a déclaré :

    Quoted message said:
    email hidden said:

    I think extremely cold situations make it hard to ride at
    full power, but no idea why.

    I heard recently somewhere that it was non-essential use of shoe
    booties. Anything more than baggies across the toes is to be avoided.

    Curtis L. Russell
    Odenton, MD (USA)

    Exactly. I was complaining a while back about cold feet with hot hands on
    sub-freezing days. When I reduced the layering, it got much better. I
    imagine sweat stays inside the Windtex socks I got, and cools during the
    evaporation cycle. Now, just socks, shoes, and a wind-reducing bootie is
    working fine.
    --
    --
    Sandy

    --
    Si les autres parties du monde ont des singes ; l'Europe a des Français.
    Cela se compense.
    [Arthur Schopenhauer]

  2. "Mad Dog" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    (so why doesn't the oh-so-efficient LANCE have
    to wear a jacket all the time?)

    For a few years (long ago) I got kind of over-psyched about riding
    faster and my
    body fat got down to the 3-4% range (granted no big deal for some
    people but a
    major event for me). I remember having to wear a jacket in fairly
    warm summer
    weather.

    Quoted message said:

    I don't think even LANCE weighed his [censored].

    He probably woulda, but Lafferty kept snatching it.


    good one

    PH

  3. You wouldn't have to weigh your [censored] if you were truly measuring the
    complete metabolism of glycogen, if I recall my high school biology,
    glucose breaks down into CO2 and water. You'd lose it via exhalation
    and sweat.

    Correct me if I'm wrong - it's been a while since I got that master's
    degree in life sciences, tho'.

  4. "Robert Chung" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Not to mention the fact that Armstrong's gross efficiency, at least as
    reported by Coyle, never exceeded 24%.

    That phrase, "not to mention"? I do not think it means what you think it
    means.

    Actually, it does.

    Andy Coggan

  5. Quoted message said:
    Donald Munro said:
    bjw said:

    >The body's efficiency is about 20-25%


    Mark Fennell said:

    <Troll>
    Unless you're LA in which case you can train your efficiency to improve
    dramatically beyond this level.
    </Troll>

    Your troll sucks. You forgot the keywords higher cadence.

    Not to mention the fact that Armstrong's gross efficiency, at least as
    reported by Coyle, never exceeded 24%.

    Andy Coggan

    How is this measured? Do they put him in a giant calorimeter?

    Steve

    Quoted message said:
  6. Steven Bornfeld <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    <snip>

    Quoted message said:


    How is this measured? Do they put him in a giant calorimeter?

    The real Lance Armstrong died in 1988 as a result of chemotherapy. The
    "Lance Armstrong" that won all the races is actually a cyborg, it's the
    main reason why he keeps getting ditched by the women in his life. But
    to get back on point, because he is a nuclear-powered cyborg, tracking
    his net energy use and total efficiency is a lot simpler. They just
    measure the amount of plutonium consumed and since they know how much
    was there to begin with, the calculation is straightforward.

    --
    Bill Asher

  7. Steven Bornfeld said:
    Quoted message said:

    How is this measured? Do they put him in a giant calorimeter?

    William Asher said:

    The real Lance Armstrong died in 1988 as a result of chemotherapy. The
    "Lance Armstrong" that won all the races is actually a cyborg, it's the
    main reason why he keeps getting ditched by the women in his life.

    Sounds like the answer for heathers desire for a power measuring BB device.

  8. Sandy, no one is surprised that a lawyer has sweaty hands. Greed does
    that to one.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.