General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Question about setting one's "goal weight"

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 7 posts · 340 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
17 June 2005
Last activity
17 June 2005
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
340
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Just curious: Does everyone just use the BMI as a strict guide, or do
    they make their own adjustments? In my case, I am 6 foot 3, and I have
    a huge frame. Also, I am a former weightlifter and I still have a good
    deal of residual upper-body muscular bulk, and in addition, even at my
    heaviest, I have been athletic, and able to run four miles in forty
    minutes, approximately 3-5 times a week, with minimal effort. Hence, my
    legs are like tree trunks (e.g., even more muscle weight).

    As it stands right now, I have virtually no abdominal obesity
    noticeable whatsoever, other than a bit of a "jiggly layer" that
    bunches up when I bend over.

    So, I've tentatively set my goal weight at 200. However, I just can't
    imagine weighing 200 pounds. I haven't weighed that since.... well... I
    can't remember when (probably grade school).

    Anyways, I'm wondering if I should set myself a goal more like 220,
    and then evaluate from there.

    Interested in how other people set their goal weight...

    258/243/200(?)

  2. You sound a lot like my husband. He is 6' 4" and muscular, weighs 215 and
    has a BMI of 26, which is actually "overweight" for him, but he has a body
    fat percentage of 11% and the recommended percentage for a man is 15%. So
    his BMI # is off, and it sounds like yours probably is too. I think
    calculating Body Fat Percentage is a much better guide to use when trying to
    come up with a goal weight. Here is a good website to help you calculate:

    http://www.he.net/~zone/prothd2.html

    HTH,
    Julie

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Just curious: Does everyone just use the BMI as a strict guide, or do
    they make their own adjustments? In my case, I am 6 foot 3, and I have
    a huge frame. Also, I am a former weightlifter and I still have a good
    deal of residual upper-body muscular bulk, and in addition, even at my
    heaviest, I have been athletic, and able to run four miles in forty
    minutes, approximately 3-5 times a week, with minimal effort. Hence, my
    legs are like tree trunks (e.g., even more muscle weight).

    As it stands right now, I have virtually no abdominal obesity
    noticeable whatsoever, other than a bit of a "jiggly layer" that
    bunches up when I bend over.

    So, I've tentatively set my goal weight at 200. However, I just can't
    imagine weighing 200 pounds. I haven't weighed that since.... well... I
    can't remember when (probably grade school).

    Anyways, I'm wondering if I should set myself a goal more like 220,
    and then evaluate from there.

    Interested in how other people set their goal weight...

    258/243/200(?)


  3. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Interested in how other people set their goal weight...

    258/243/200(?)

    I didn't really use my BMI - I just know that I was always pretty happy at
    126, which is the weight I was for most of my life, btu I could always stad
    to firm up and lose a few more pounds.

    So - I set my goal at 120 and would like to be in a sz 4. That seems about
    right. I am not solid on it though - I get to 130 and feel "done" I will
    stay there or if I get to 120 and still have alot of blubber I will work
    harder.

    All I know is I am still overweight at 140 so I need to continue trying to
    lose.

    I am 5'3" .

    Good luck...

    JoAnna
    176/142/120

  4. Instead of using bodyweight as a goal, try using bodyfat%. Try to get down
    to 10% and see how you like it.

    --

    Eat less, exercise more. -- MFW

    --
    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Just curious: Does everyone just use the BMI as a strict guide, or do
    they make their own adjustments? In my case, I am 6 foot 3, and I have
    a huge frame. Also, I am a former weightlifter and I still have a good
    deal of residual upper-body muscular bulk, and in addition, even at my
    heaviest, I have been athletic, and able to run four miles in forty
    minutes, approximately 3-5 times a week, with minimal effort. Hence, my
    legs are like tree trunks (e.g., even more muscle weight).

    As it stands right now, I have virtually no abdominal obesity
    noticeable whatsoever, other than a bit of a "jiggly layer" that
    bunches up when I bend over.

    So, I've tentatively set my goal weight at 200. However, I just can't
    imagine weighing 200 pounds. I haven't weighed that since.... well... I
    can't remember when (probably grade school).

    Anyways, I'm wondering if I should set myself a goal more like 220,
    and then evaluate from there.

    Interested in how other people set their goal weight...

    258/243/200(?)

  5. I set mine at 165 just because that's the thinnest Ive been, in my adult
    life. Not a great reason....but the only reason. Like you...I just cant
    imagine weighing 145. But....Im beginning to get comfortable with the
    fact that....Im gonna KEEP losing, regardless. WHY stop at 165? I'll
    KNOW when to stop....when m there.

    and so will you.

    Im tall and have a pretty big 'frame", too. My shoulders are very wide
    and Im pretty muscular. I truly cant imagine that under 145 wouldnt be
    TOO thin.

    But, again...we'll know when we get there.

    Start LC~5-16-05
    202-?-165
    (i'm scale phobic)

  6. You're not big boned. You're fat.

    --
    Did it ever occur to you that you are a hemorrhoid on the anus of
    society? -- MFW

    "Lass Chance" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Im tall and have a pretty big 'frame", too. My shoulders are very wide
    and Im pretty muscular.

  7. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Quoted message said:


    Interested in how other people set their goal weight...

    Incrementally in my case. My original goal was 175 (I started at 248).
    My current goal is 165 (I am at 167 now). I've already decided that my
    next goal is 155, based on how I look now. I still have quite a bit
    around my belly, and my thighs. My arm and leg muscles seem to be slowly
    increasing as I've started a daily exercise routine in the morning of
    pushups (the hardest for me), lunges, and crunches. My face has recently
    lost a bit of fat.

    Percent bodyfat (as JC suggested) is a probably a good way as well. I am
    running around 22% now, if my relatively new bathroom scale with
    bodyfat/water readings is to be believed. 10% should be around 145
    pounds if I did the quick calculations correctly using my current weight
    and bodyfat, which considering what I look like now seems like a
    believable ballpark number. We'll see. That would be losing around 60%
    of my bodyfat (assuming no muscle loss).

    When I started, I thought I'd have to be thin at 175, which of course
    proved not to be the case. I certainly looked and felt a lot better, but
    I was by no means thin, nor am I today.

    --
    ---
    Chris Smolinski
    Black Cat Systems
    http://www.blackcatsystems.com

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.