Question about Lyles Forum

JimR' jremick@comcast said:

I really want to know who that babe is on Tylers avatar.
She is smokin hot!

Why don't you sign up and ask Tyler yourself?

On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 02:16:44 GMT, [email hidden] (The Queen of
Cans and Jars) wrote in misc.fitness.weights:

Quoted message said:

JimR' jremick@comcast said:

I really want to know who that babe is on Tylers avatar.
She is smokin hot!

Why don't you sign up and ask Tyler yourself?

He is signed up. He lurks there but has never posted...as of about a
month ago anyway.

"John Hanson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 02:16:44 GMT, [email hidden] (The Queen of
Cans and Jars) wrote in misc.fitness.weights:

Quoted message said:

JimR' jremick@comcast said:

I really want to know who that babe is on Tylers avatar.
She is smokin hot!

Why don't you sign up and ask Tyler yourself?

He is signed up. He lurks there but has never posted...as of about a
month ago anyway.

I just want her name..she is a fine babe...those abs are amazing.

Jim

John Hanson said:

On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 02:16:44 GMT, [email hidden] (The Queen of
Cans and Jars) wrote in misc.fitness.weights:

Quoted message said:

JimR' jremick@comcast said:

I really want to know who that babe is on Tylers avatar.
She is smokin hot!

Why don't you sign up and ask Tyler yourself?

He is signed up. He lurks there but has never posted...as of about a
month ago anyway.

Well, that's Jim for ya.

I signed up but can't even remember to lurk half the time let alone
post. But I tell you what: if I wanted to ask someone there a question,
I WOULDN'T ASK IT HERE.

(The Queen of Cans and Jars) said:

John Hanson said:

(The Queen of Cans and Jars) said:

"JimR" <jremick@comcast> wrote:

> I really want to know who that babe is on Tylers avatar.
> She is smokin hot!

Why don't you sign up and ask Tyler yourself?

He is signed up. He lurks there but has never posted...as of about a
month ago anyway.

Well, that's Jim for ya.

I signed up but can't even remember to lurk half the time let alone
post.

<heh> For as "cutting edge" as that forum is supposed to be, I noticed
that the study on training to failure that I posted 3 weeks ago,
leading to a rather contentious thread, finally appeared on Lyle's
forum a week ago. After a number of posts discussing the study,
including posts by Lyle, it appears that nobody has even read past the
abstract.
--

JMW
http://www.rustyiron.net

On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 00:08:38 -0400, JMW <[email hidden]> wrote in
misc.fitness.weights:

Quoted message said:

(The Queen of Cans and Jars) said:

John Hanson said:

[email hidden] (The Queen of Cans and Jars) wrote:
>"JimR" <jremick@comcast> wrote:
>
>> I really want to know who that babe is on Tylers avatar.
>> She is smokin hot!
>
>Why don't you sign up and ask Tyler yourself?

He is signed up. He lurks there but has never posted...as of about a
month ago anyway.

Well, that's Jim for ya.

I signed up but can't even remember to lurk half the time let alone
post.

<heh> For as "cutting edge" as that forum is supposed to be, I noticed
that the study on training to failure that I posted 3 weeks ago,
leading to a rather contentious thread, finally appeared on Lyle's
forum a week ago. After a number of posts discussing the study,
including posts by Lyle, it appears that nobody has even read past the
abstract.

Lyle has been having "issues" again.

John Hanson said:

JMW said:

(The Queen of Cans and Jars) said:

John Hanson <[email hidden]> wrote:
> [email hidden] (The Queen of Cans and Jars) wrote:
> >"JimR" <jremick@comcast> wrote:
> >
> >> I really want to know who that babe is on Tylers avatar.
> >> She is smokin hot!
> >
> >Why don't you sign up and ask Tyler yourself?
>
> He is signed up. He lurks there but has never posted...as of about a
> month ago anyway.

Well, that's Jim for ya.

I signed up but can't even remember to lurk half the time let alone
post.

<heh> For as "cutting edge" as that forum is supposed to be, I noticed
that the study on training to failure that I posted 3 weeks ago,
leading to a rather contentious thread, finally appeared on Lyle's
forum a week ago. After a number of posts discussing the study,
including posts by Lyle, it appears that nobody has even read past the
abstract.

Lyle has been having "issues" again.

It ain't just Lyle.
--

JMW
http://www.rustyiron.net

On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 00:30:53 -0400, JMW <[email hidden]> wrote in
misc.fitness.weights:

Quoted message said:

John Hanson said:

JMW said:

[email hidden] (The Queen of Cans and Jars) wrote:
>John Hanson <[email hidden]> wrote:
>> [email hidden] (The Queen of Cans and Jars) wrote:
>> >"JimR" <jremick@comcast> wrote:
>> >
>> >> I really want to know who that babe is on Tylers avatar.
>> >> She is smokin hot!
>> >
>> >Why don't you sign up and ask Tyler yourself?
>>
>> He is signed up. He lurks there but has never posted...as of about a
>> month ago anyway.
>
>Well, that's Jim for ya.
>
>I signed up but can't even remember to lurk half the time let alone
>post.

<heh> For as "cutting edge" as that forum is supposed to be, I noticed
that the study on training to failure that I posted 3 weeks ago,
leading to a rather contentious thread, finally appeared on Lyle's
forum a week ago. After a number of posts discussing the study,
including posts by Lyle, it appears that nobody has even read past the
abstract.

Lyle has been having "issues" again.

It ain't just Lyle.

Speaking of training to failure, there are a lot of guys under 200
pounds at my gym who bench close to or more than 300 pounds raw who
always do assisted reps in the bench after they start to fail.

John Hanson said:

JMW said:

John Hanson said:

JMW <[email hidden]> wrote:
>[email hidden] (The Queen of Cans and Jars) wrote:
>>John Hanson <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>> [email hidden] (The Queen of Cans and Jars) wrote:
>>> >"JimR" <jremick@comcast> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> I really want to know who that babe is on Tylers avatar.
>>> >> She is smokin hot!
>>> >
>>> >Why don't you sign up and ask Tyler yourself?
>>>
>>> He is signed up. He lurks there but has never posted...as of about a
>>> month ago anyway.
>>
>>Well, that's Jim for ya.
>>
>>I signed up but can't even remember to lurk half the time let alone
>>post.
>
><heh> For as "cutting edge" as that forum is supposed to be, I noticed
>that the study on training to failure that I posted 3 weeks ago,
>leading to a rather contentious thread, finally appeared on Lyle's
>forum a week ago. After a number of posts discussing the study,
>including posts by Lyle, it appears that nobody has even read past the
>abstract.

Lyle has been having "issues" again.

It ain't just Lyle.

Speaking of training to failure, there are a lot of guys under 200
pounds at my gym who bench close to or more than 300 pounds raw who
always do assisted reps in the bench after they start to fail.

It does have its benefits. It also has risks. Due to my rotator cuff
problems, I no longer bench press to failure unless I'm testing a max
lift.
--

JMW
http://www.rustyiron.net

John Hanson said:

On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 02:16:44 GMT, [email hidden] (The Queen of
Cans and Jars) wrote in misc.fitness.weights:

Quoted message said:

JimR' jremick@comcast said:

I really want to know who that babe is on Tylers avatar.
She is smokin hot!

Why don't you sign up and ask Tyler yourself?

He is signed up. He lurks there but has never posted...as of about a
month ago anyway.

So am I and have been for some time. To be honest I have never felt
the urge to post because there is nothing particularly interesting
there to post about.

It may be the disjointed set up, or the muted input to a moderated
site, but I just can't get the feel of it - not that I go there very
often.

The chances of me getting a post past the moderator are probably quite
slim!! ;o)

On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 03:54:36 GMT, [email hidden] (The Queen of

Cans and Jars) said:

John Hanson said:

On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 02:16:44 GMT, [email hidden] (The Queen of
Cans and Jars) wrote in misc.fitness.weights:

Quoted message said:

"JimR" <jremick@comcast> wrote:

> I really want to know who that babe is on Tylers avatar.
> She is smokin hot!

Why don't you sign up and ask Tyler yourself?

He is signed up. He lurks there but has never posted...as of about a
month ago anyway.

Well, that's Jim for ya.

I signed up but can't even remember to lurk half the time let alone
post. But I tell you what: if I wanted to ask someone there a question,
I WOULDN'T ASK IT HERE.

When you're right Queenie you're right!! ;o)

JMW said:

(The Queen of Cans and Jars) said:

John Hanson said:

[email hidden] (The Queen of Cans and Jars) wrote:
>"JimR" <jremick@comcast> wrote:
>
>> I really want to know who that babe is on Tylers avatar.
>> She is smokin hot!
>
>Why don't you sign up and ask Tyler yourself?

He is signed up. He lurks there but has never posted...as of about a
month ago anyway.

Well, that's Jim for ya.

I signed up but can't even remember to lurk half the time let alone
post.

<heh> For as "cutting edge" as that forum is supposed to be, I noticed
that the study on training to failure that I posted 3 weeks ago,
leading to a rather contentious thread, finally appeared on Lyle's
forum a week ago. After a number of posts discussing the study,
including posts by Lyle, it appears that nobody has even read past the
abstract.

Thus proving that which I said earlier. I'm surprised she let it
through at all - or him, the bumptious [censored]!! ;o)

JMW said:

John Hanson said:

JMW said:

[email hidden] (The Queen of Cans and Jars) wrote:
>John Hanson <[email hidden]> wrote:
>> [email hidden] (The Queen of Cans and Jars) wrote:
>> >"JimR" <jremick@comcast> wrote:
>> >
>> >> I really want to know who that babe is on Tylers avatar.
>> >> She is smokin hot!
>> >
>> >Why don't you sign up and ask Tyler yourself?
>>
>> He is signed up. He lurks there but has never posted...as of about a
>> month ago anyway.
>
>Well, that's Jim for ya.
>
>I signed up but can't even remember to lurk half the time let alone
>post.

<heh> For as "cutting edge" as that forum is supposed to be, I noticed
that the study on training to failure that I posted 3 weeks ago,
leading to a rather contentious thread, finally appeared on Lyle's
forum a week ago. After a number of posts discussing the study,
including posts by Lyle, it appears that nobody has even read past the
abstract.

Lyle has been having "issues" again.

Don't forget the dusky drama queen!!

Have a great weekend JW - you know I will!! ;o)

TFIF!!

Charles said:

John Hanson said:

On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 02:16:44 GMT, [email hidden] (The Queen of
Cans and Jars) wrote in misc.fitness.weights:

Quoted message said:

"JimR" <jremick@comcast> wrote:

> I really want to know who that babe is on Tylers avatar.
> She is smokin hot!

Why don't you sign up and ask Tyler yourself?

He is signed up. He lurks there but has never posted...as of about a
month ago anyway.

So am I and have been for some time. To be honest I have never felt
the urge to post because there is nothing particularly interesting
there to post about.

It may be the disjointed set up, or the muted input to a moderated
site, but I just can't get the feel of it - not that I go there very
often.

The chances of me getting a post past the moderator are probably quite
slim!! ;o)

Why don't you try it and see?
There are thread topics where knowledge isn't required.
--
Bob Mann

Before you critisize someone,
you should walk a mile in their shoes.
That way, when you critisize them,
you're a mile away and you have their shoes.

On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 07:39:09 -0500, Bob Mann <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Charles said:

John Hanson said:

On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 02:16:44 GMT, [email hidden] (The Queen of
Cans and Jars) wrote in misc.fitness.weights:

>"JimR" <jremick@comcast> wrote:
>
>> I really want to know who that babe is on Tylers avatar.
>> She is smokin hot!
>
>Why don't you sign up and ask Tyler yourself?

He is signed up. He lurks there but has never posted...as of about a
month ago anyway.

So am I and have been for some time. To be honest I have never felt
the urge to post because there is nothing particularly interesting
there to post about.

It may be the disjointed set up, or the muted input to a moderated
site, but I just can't get the feel of it - not that I go there very
often.

The chances of me getting a post past the moderator are probably quite
slim!! ;o)

Why don't you try it and see?
There are thread topics where knowledge isn't required.

<heh>

Greta put down - 10 out of 10!!

Nice oblique kick in the balls Bob, what did I do to you? ;o)

Have a great weekend - I always do!! ;o)

TFIF!

"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

FWIW, I have not known of anyone having a post refused. Neither would
I post anything there under a recognizable identity. My issue is not
with access.
--

Oh, I think at least part of your issue is or was with "access".
What's the point of continuing to take swipes at Lyle when he doesn't even
post here anymore?

ATP* said:

JMW said:

FWIW, I have not known of anyone having a post refused. Neither would
I post anything there under a recognizable identity. My issue is not
with access.

Oh, I think at least part of your issue is or was with "access".

It appears that thinking is not your greatest talent, Mike.

Quoted message said:

What's the point of continuing to take swipes at Lyle when he doesn't even
post here anymore?

My comments are not directed at Lyle. They are directed at a forum
which some (including you) have consistently promoted in MFW. If, as
some have implied, that forum is a superior source of information, why
are people coming to MFW to ask questions that should be addressed
there? For that matter, why are you still here? Folks like August and
Proton seem to have taken up permanent residence at the ashram.

FWIW, this is not the first time a web forum has been criticized in
MFW:

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/misc.fitness.weights/msg/dadba7972680c9f0?dmode=source&hl=en
(http://tinyurl.com/cbg8l)

"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

ATP* said:

JMW said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

What's the point of continuing to take swipes at Lyle when he doesn't
even
post here anymore?

My comments are not directed at Lyle. They are directed at a forum
which some (including you) have consistently promoted in MFW.

Whatever you say. The website has good articles and Lyle's keto book is
useful and straightforward. IIRC, my recommendation related to the website,
not the discussion forum, which I haven't checked out in a while and have
never participated in.

If, as

Quoted message said:

some have implied, that forum is a superior source of information, why
are people coming to MFW to ask questions that should be addressed
there? For that matter, why are you still here? Folks like August and
Proton seem to have taken up permanent residence at the ashram.

I'm here out of habit and because some people here still have
valuable/interesting information to contribute. For example, Will's recent
post of the video on www.crossfit.com led me to check out that program. I'm
not a fan of web forums in general. I don't like the interface as compared
with usenet.

Bob Mann said:

Charles said:

John Hanson said:

On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 02:16:44 GMT, [email hidden] (The Queen of
Cans and Jars) wrote in misc.fitness.weights:

>"JimR" <jremick@comcast> wrote:
>
>> I really want to know who that babe is on Tylers avatar.
>> She is smokin hot!
>
>Why don't you sign up and ask Tyler yourself?

He is signed up. He lurks there but has never posted...as of about a
month ago anyway.

So am I and have been for some time. To be honest I have never felt
the urge to post because there is nothing particularly interesting
there to post about.

It may be the disjointed set up, or the muted input to a moderated
site, but I just can't get the feel of it - not that I go there very
often.

The chances of me getting a post past the moderator are probably quite
slim!! ;o)

Why don't you try it and see?
There are thread topics where knowledge isn't required.
--
Bob Mann

That was a good one.