General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Question about caloric consumption vis. running

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 78 posts · 2,078 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
8 August 2005
Last activity
12 August 2005
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
78
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,078
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 78
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. (x-posted to rec.running)

    My "Diet and Excercise Assistant" Palm Pilot program calculates caloric
    expenditures from excercise. I just ran 55 minutes at 6 miles an hour
    (actually I went faster than that, but it got rounded down to 6 mph).
    Anyways, the program tells me that at 235 pounds, running for 55
    minutes, at 6 miles per hour, I burned approximately 1100
    calories!!!!??!!! That sounds like a pretty huge amount.

    Does this sound right to people? The treadmill readout listed about 600
    calories burned, but it didn't ask me for my weight in arriving at this
    calculation.

    Opinions please.

  2. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    (x-posted to rec.running)

    My "Diet and Excercise Assistant" Palm Pilot program calculates caloric
    expenditures from excercise. I just ran 55 minutes at 6 miles an hour
    (actually I went faster than that, but it got rounded down to 6 mph).
    Anyways, the program tells me that at 235 pounds, running for 55
    minutes, at 6 miles per hour, I burned approximately 1100
    calories!!!!??!!! That sounds like a pretty huge amount.

    Does this sound right to people? The treadmill readout listed about 600
    calories burned, but it didn't ask me for my weight in arriving at this
    calculation.

    Opinions please.

    http://www.exrx.net/Calculators/Calories.html
    http://liftforlife.homestead.com/fitnesscalculators.html#anchor_16097

  3. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    (x-posted to rec.running)

    My "Diet and Excercise Assistant" Palm Pilot program calculates caloric
    expenditures from excercise. I just ran 55 minutes at 6 miles an hour
    (actually I went faster than that, but it got rounded down to 6 mph).
    Anyways, the program tells me that at 235 pounds, running for 55
    minutes, at 6 miles per hour, I burned approximately 1100
    calories!!!!??!!! That sounds like a pretty huge amount.

    Does this sound right to people? The treadmill readout listed about 600
    calories burned, but it didn't ask me for my weight in arriving at this
    calculation.

    Opinions please.

    http://www.exrx.net/Calculators/Calories.html
    http://liftforlife.homestead.com/fitnesscalculators.html#anchor_16097

  4. It's programmed to tell you what you want to hear.

    --
    Most people are dumb as bricks; some people are dumber than that. -- MFW

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    (x-posted to rec.running)

    My "Diet and Excercise Assistant" Palm Pilot program calculates caloric
    expenditures from excercise. I just ran 55 minutes at 6 miles an hour
    (actually I went faster than that, but it got rounded down to 6 mph).
    Anyways, the program tells me that at 235 pounds, running for 55
    minutes, at 6 miles per hour, I burned approximately 1100
    calories!!!!??!!! That sounds like a pretty huge amount.

    Does this sound right to people? The treadmill readout listed about 600
    calories burned, but it didn't ask me for my weight in arriving at this
    calculation.

    Opinions please.

  5. It's programmed to tell you what you want to hear.

    --
    Most people are dumb as bricks; some people are dumber than that. -- MFW

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    (x-posted to rec.running)

    My "Diet and Excercise Assistant" Palm Pilot program calculates caloric
    expenditures from excercise. I just ran 55 minutes at 6 miles an hour
    (actually I went faster than that, but it got rounded down to 6 mph).
    Anyways, the program tells me that at 235 pounds, running for 55
    minutes, at 6 miles per hour, I burned approximately 1100
    calories!!!!??!!! That sounds like a pretty huge amount.

    Does this sound right to people? The treadmill readout listed about 600
    calories burned, but it didn't ask me for my weight in arriving at this
    calculation.

    Opinions please.

  6. Yes, this does indeed sound about right. 235 lbs is a lot of weight to
    lug around for an hour. I just checked another web-based calculator
    and it came up with about the same amount of calories, a tad lower.

    To be safe I'd always round down those numbers to the next lowest 100,
    and have a healthy skepticism of anything a treadmill tells you.

    -josh

    Quoted message said:

    (x-posted to rec.running)

    My "Diet and Excercise Assistant" Palm Pilot program calculates caloric
    expenditures from excercise. I just ran 55 minutes at 6 miles an hour
    (actually I went faster than that, but it got rounded down to 6 mph).
    Anyways, the program tells me that at 235 pounds, running for 55
    minutes, at 6 miles per hour, I burned approximately 1100
    calories!!!!??!!! That sounds like a pretty huge amount.

    Does this sound right to people? The treadmill readout listed about 600
    calories burned, but it didn't ask me for my weight in arriving at this
    calculation.

    Opinions please.

  7. You couldn't be more wrong if you tried.

    --
    Most people are dumb as bricks; some people are dumber than that. -- MFW

    "joshv" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Yes, this does indeed sound about right. 235 lbs is a lot of weight to
    lug around for an hour. I just checked another web-based calculator
    and it came up with about the same amount of calories, a tad lower.

    To be safe I'd always round down those numbers to the next lowest 100,
    and have a healthy skepticism of anything a treadmill tells you.

    -josh

    Quoted message said:

    (x-posted to rec.running)

    My "Diet and Excercise Assistant" Palm Pilot program calculates caloric
    expenditures from excercise. I just ran 55 minutes at 6 miles an hour
    (actually I went faster than that, but it got rounded down to 6 mph).
    Anyways, the program tells me that at 235 pounds, running for 55
    minutes, at 6 miles per hour, I burned approximately 1100
    calories!!!!??!!! That sounds like a pretty huge amount.

    Does this sound right to people? The treadmill readout listed about 600
    calories burned, but it didn't ask me for my weight in arriving at this
    calculation.

    Opinions please.


  8. "JC Der Koenig" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    You couldn't be more wrong if you tried.


    Actually, he's right.

    Quoted message said:


    --
    Most people are dumb as bricks; some people are dumber than that. -- MFW

    "joshv" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Yes, this does indeed sound about right. 235 lbs is a lot of weight to
    lug around for an hour. I just checked another web-based calculator
    and it came up with about the same amount of calories, a tad lower.

    To be safe I'd always round down those numbers to the next lowest 100,
    and have a healthy skepticism of anything a treadmill tells you.

    -josh

    Quoted message said:

    (x-posted to rec.running)

    My "Diet and Excercise Assistant" Palm Pilot program calculates caloric
    expenditures from excercise. I just ran 55 minutes at 6 miles an hour
    (actually I went faster than that, but it got rounded down to 6 mph).
    Anyways, the program tells me that at 235 pounds, running for 55
    minutes, at 6 miles per hour, I burned approximately 1100
    calories!!!!??!!! That sounds like a pretty huge amount.

    Does this sound right to people? The treadmill readout listed about 600
    calories burned, but it didn't ask me for my weight in arriving at this
    calculation.

    Opinions please.


  9. "JC Der Koenig" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    You couldn't be more wrong if you tried.


    Actually, he's right.

    Quoted message said:


    --
    Most people are dumb as bricks; some people are dumber than that. -- MFW

    "joshv" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Yes, this does indeed sound about right. 235 lbs is a lot of weight to
    lug around for an hour. I just checked another web-based calculator
    and it came up with about the same amount of calories, a tad lower.

    To be safe I'd always round down those numbers to the next lowest 100,
    and have a healthy skepticism of anything a treadmill tells you.

    -josh

    Quoted message said:

    (x-posted to rec.running)

    My "Diet and Excercise Assistant" Palm Pilot program calculates caloric
    expenditures from excercise. I just ran 55 minutes at 6 miles an hour
    (actually I went faster than that, but it got rounded down to 6 mph).
    Anyways, the program tells me that at 235 pounds, running for 55
    minutes, at 6 miles per hour, I burned approximately 1100
    calories!!!!??!!! That sounds like a pretty huge amount.

    Does this sound right to people? The treadmill readout listed about 600
    calories burned, but it didn't ask me for my weight in arriving at this
    calculation.

    Opinions please.


  10. Quoted message said:

    (x-posted to rec.running)

    My "Diet and Excercise Assistant" Palm Pilot program calculates caloric
    expenditures from excercise. I just ran 55 minutes at 6 miles an hour
    (actually I went faster than that, but it got rounded down to 6 mph).
    Anyways, the program tells me that at 235 pounds, running for 55
    minutes, at 6 miles per hour, I burned approximately 1100
    calories!!!!??!!! That sounds like a pretty huge amount.

    It sounds about right to me.

    Quoted message said:

    Does this sound right to people? The treadmill readout listed about 600
    calories burned, but it didn't ask me for my weight in arriving at this
    calculation.

    if it did not ask you for the weight, and does not have a built in
    scale, it is worthless.

    i

  11. Quoted message said:

    (x-posted to rec.running)

    My "Diet and Excercise Assistant" Palm Pilot program calculates caloric
    expenditures from excercise. I just ran 55 minutes at 6 miles an hour
    (actually I went faster than that, but it got rounded down to 6 mph).
    Anyways, the program tells me that at 235 pounds, running for 55
    minutes, at 6 miles per hour, I burned approximately 1100
    calories!!!!??!!! That sounds like a pretty huge amount.

    It sounds about right to me.

    Quoted message said:

    Does this sound right to people? The treadmill readout listed about 600
    calories burned, but it didn't ask me for my weight in arriving at this
    calculation.

    if it did not ask you for the weight, and does not have a built in
    scale, it is worthless.

    i

  12. No, he's not.

    --
    Most people are dumb as bricks; some people are dumber than that. -- MFW

    "Bob Garrison" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "JC Der Koenig" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    You couldn't be more wrong if you tried.


    Actually, he's right.

    Quoted message said:


    --
    Most people are dumb as bricks; some people are dumber than that. -- MFW

    "joshv" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Yes, this does indeed sound about right. 235 lbs is a lot of weight to
    lug around for an hour. I just checked another web-based calculator
    and it came up with about the same amount of calories, a tad lower.

    -josh

    [email hidden] wrote:
    > (x-posted to rec.running)
    >
    > My "Diet and Excercise Assistant" Palm Pilot program calculates caloric
    > expenditures from excercise. I just ran 55 minutes at 6 miles an hour
    > (actually I went faster than that, but it got rounded down to 6 mph).
    > Anyways, the program tells me that at 235 pounds, running for 55
    > minutes, at 6 miles per hour, I burned approximately 1100
    > calories!!!!??!!! That sounds like a pretty huge amount.
    >
    > Does this sound right to people? The treadmill readout listed about 600
    > calories burned, but it didn't ask me for my weight in arriving at this
    > calculation.
    >
    > Opinions please.

  13. No, he's not.

    --
    Most people are dumb as bricks; some people are dumber than that. -- MFW

    "Bob Garrison" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "JC Der Koenig" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    You couldn't be more wrong if you tried.


    Actually, he's right.

    Quoted message said:


    --
    Most people are dumb as bricks; some people are dumber than that. -- MFW

    "joshv" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Yes, this does indeed sound about right. 235 lbs is a lot of weight to
    lug around for an hour. I just checked another web-based calculator
    and it came up with about the same amount of calories, a tad lower.

    -josh

    [email hidden] wrote:
    > (x-posted to rec.running)
    >
    > My "Diet and Excercise Assistant" Palm Pilot program calculates caloric
    > expenditures from excercise. I just ran 55 minutes at 6 miles an hour
    > (actually I went faster than that, but it got rounded down to 6 mph).
    > Anyways, the program tells me that at 235 pounds, running for 55
    > minutes, at 6 miles per hour, I burned approximately 1100
    > calories!!!!??!!! That sounds like a pretty huge amount.
    >
    > Does this sound right to people? The treadmill readout listed about 600
    > calories burned, but it didn't ask me for my weight in arriving at this
    > calculation.
    >
    > Opinions please.

  14. "JC Der Koenig" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    No, he's not.

    My dad can beat the [censored] out of your dad.

    Quoted message said:

    Most people are dumb as bricks; some people are dumber than that. -- MFW

    "Bob Garrison" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "JC Der Koenig" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    You couldn't be more wrong if you tried.


    Actually, he's right.

    Quoted message said:


    --
    Most people are dumb as bricks; some people are dumber than that. --
    MFW

    "joshv" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    > Yes, this does indeed sound about right. 235 lbs is a lot of weight to
    > lug around for an hour. I just checked another web-based calculator
    > and it came up with about the same amount of calories, a tad lower.
    >
    >
    > -josh
    >
    > [email hidden] wrote:
    >> (x-posted to rec.running)
    >>
    >> My "Diet and Excercise Assistant" Palm Pilot program calculates
    >> caloric
    >> expenditures from excercise. I just ran 55 minutes at 6 miles an hour
    >> (actually I went faster than that, but it got rounded down to 6 mph).
    >> Anyways, the program tells me that at 235 pounds, running for 55
    >> minutes, at 6 miles per hour, I burned approximately 1100
    >> calories!!!!??!!! That sounds like a pretty huge amount.
    >>
    >> Does this sound right to people? The treadmill readout listed about
    >> 600
    >> calories burned, but it didn't ask me for my weight in arriving at
    >> this
    >> calculation.
    >>
    >> Opinions please.
    >

  15. "JC Der Koenig" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    No, he's not.

    My dad can beat the [censored] out of your dad.

    Quoted message said:

    Most people are dumb as bricks; some people are dumber than that. -- MFW

    "Bob Garrison" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "JC Der Koenig" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    You couldn't be more wrong if you tried.


    Actually, he's right.

    Quoted message said:


    --
    Most people are dumb as bricks; some people are dumber than that. --
    MFW

    "joshv" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    > Yes, this does indeed sound about right. 235 lbs is a lot of weight to
    > lug around for an hour. I just checked another web-based calculator
    > and it came up with about the same amount of calories, a tad lower.
    >
    >
    > -josh
    >
    > [email hidden] wrote:
    >> (x-posted to rec.running)
    >>
    >> My "Diet and Excercise Assistant" Palm Pilot program calculates
    >> caloric
    >> expenditures from excercise. I just ran 55 minutes at 6 miles an hour
    >> (actually I went faster than that, but it got rounded down to 6 mph).
    >> Anyways, the program tells me that at 235 pounds, running for 55
    >> minutes, at 6 miles per hour, I burned approximately 1100
    >> calories!!!!??!!! That sounds like a pretty huge amount.
    >>
    >> Does this sound right to people? The treadmill readout listed about
    >> 600
    >> calories burned, but it didn't ask me for my weight in arriving at
    >> this
    >> calculation.
    >>
    >> Opinions please.
    >

  16. LOL

    Bob Garrison said:

    "JC Der Koenig" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    No, he's not.

    My dad can beat the [censored] out of your dad.

    Quoted message said:

    Most people are dumb as bricks; some people are dumber than that. -- MFW

    "Bob Garrison" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "JC Der Koenig" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    > You couldn't be more wrong if you tried.
    Actually, he's right.

    >
    > --
    > Most people are dumb as bricks; some people are dumber than that. --
    > MFW
    >
    >
    > "joshv" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    > news:[email hidden]...
    >> Yes, this does indeed sound about right. 235 lbs is a lot of weight to
    >> lug around for an hour. I just checked another web-based calculator
    >> and it came up with about the same amount of calories, a tad lower.
    >>
    >>
    >> -josh
    >>
    >> [email hidden] wrote:
    >>> (x-posted to rec.running)
    >>>
    >>> My "Diet and Excercise Assistant" Palm Pilot program calculates
    >>> caloric
    >>> expenditures from excercise. I just ran 55 minutes at 6 miles an hour
    >>> (actually I went faster than that, but it got rounded down to 6 mph).
    >>> Anyways, the program tells me that at 235 pounds, running for 55
    >>> minutes, at 6 miles per hour, I burned approximately 1100
    >>> calories!!!!??!!! That sounds like a pretty huge amount.
    >>>
    >>> Does this sound right to people? The treadmill readout listed about
    >>> 600
    >>> calories burned, but it didn't ask me for my weight in arriving at
    >>> this
    >>> calculation.
    >>>
    >>> Opinions please.
    >>
    >
    >

  17. LOL

    Bob Garrison said:

    "JC Der Koenig" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    No, he's not.

    My dad can beat the [censored] out of your dad.

    Quoted message said:

    Most people are dumb as bricks; some people are dumber than that. -- MFW

    "Bob Garrison" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "JC Der Koenig" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    > You couldn't be more wrong if you tried.
    Actually, he's right.

    >
    > --
    > Most people are dumb as bricks; some people are dumber than that. --
    > MFW
    >
    >
    > "joshv" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    > news:[email hidden]...
    >> Yes, this does indeed sound about right. 235 lbs is a lot of weight to
    >> lug around for an hour. I just checked another web-based calculator
    >> and it came up with about the same amount of calories, a tad lower.
    >>
    >>
    >> -josh
    >>
    >> [email hidden] wrote:
    >>> (x-posted to rec.running)
    >>>
    >>> My "Diet and Excercise Assistant" Palm Pilot program calculates
    >>> caloric
    >>> expenditures from excercise. I just ran 55 minutes at 6 miles an hour
    >>> (actually I went faster than that, but it got rounded down to 6 mph).
    >>> Anyways, the program tells me that at 235 pounds, running for 55
    >>> minutes, at 6 miles per hour, I burned approximately 1100
    >>> calories!!!!??!!! That sounds like a pretty huge amount.
    >>>
    >>> Does this sound right to people? The treadmill readout listed about
    >>> 600
    >>> calories burned, but it didn't ask me for my weight in arriving at
    >>> this
    >>> calculation.
    >>>
    >>> Opinions please.
    >>
    >
    >

  18. I doubt it. Seriously.

    --
    Most people are dumb as bricks; some people are dumber than that. -- MFW

    "Bob Garrison" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "JC Der Koenig" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    No, he's not.

    My dad can beat the [censored] out of your dad.

    Quoted message said:

    Most people are dumb as bricks; some people are dumber than that. -- MFW

    "Bob Garrison" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "JC Der Koenig" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    > You couldn't be more wrong if you tried.
    Actually, he's right.

    >
    > --
    > Most people are dumb as bricks; some people are dumber than that. --
    > MFW
    >
    >
    > "joshv" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    > news:[email hidden]...
    >> Yes, this does indeed sound about right. 235 lbs is a lot of weight
    >> to
    >> lug around for an hour. I just checked another web-based calculator
    >> and it came up with about the same amount of calories, a tad lower.
    >>
    >>
    >> -josh
    >>
    >> [email hidden] wrote:
    >>> (x-posted to rec.running)
    >>>
    >>> My "Diet and Excercise Assistant" Palm Pilot program calculates
    >>> caloric
    >>> expenditures from excercise. I just ran 55 minutes at 6 miles an hour
    >>> (actually I went faster than that, but it got rounded down to 6 mph).
    >>> Anyways, the program tells me that at 235 pounds, running for 55
    >>> minutes, at 6 miles per hour, I burned approximately 1100
    >>> calories!!!!??!!! That sounds like a pretty huge amount.
    >>>
    >>> Does this sound right to people? The treadmill readout listed about
    >>> 600
    >>> calories burned, but it didn't ask me for my weight in arriving at
    >>> this
    >>> calculation.
    >>>
    >>> Opinions please.
    >>
    >
    >

  19. Bob Garrison wrote:
    || "JC Der Koenig" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    || news:[email hidden]...
    ||| You couldn't be more wrong if you tried.
    || Actually, he's right.
    ||
    ||
    ||

    I'm not surprised you think he's right, since you're the same person, as
    your message headers show:

    [email hidden] Josh

    [email hidden] Bob Garrison

  20. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    (x-posted to rec.running)

    My "Diet and Excercise Assistant" Palm Pilot program calculates caloric
    expenditures from excercise. I just ran 55 minutes at 6 miles an hour
    (actually I went faster than that, but it got rounded down to 6 mph).
    Anyways, the program tells me that at 235 pounds, running for 55
    minutes, at 6 miles per hour, I burned approximately 1100
    calories!!!!??!!! That sounds like a pretty huge amount.

    Does this sound right to people? The treadmill readout listed about 600
    calories burned, but it didn't ask me for my weight in arriving at this
    calculation.

    Opinions please.

    Using the standard METS tables, and assuming you're of average height and
    around 45 years old, my program indicates that you would have burned 810
    calories. Even this is probably a bit high, because it assumes "real"
    running - I think treadmill running burns somewhat less calories than
    outdoor running, so 750 might be a better estimate.

    GG
    http://www.WeightWare.com
    Computer-Assisted Weight Management

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.