"anon" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:2004022110305616807%anon@anoncom...
Quoted message said:On 2004-02-21 09:59:05 -0500, "Howard McCollister" <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:Co-pay or not, most patients will be better served by having their specialty problems addressed
by a specialist.
Key word, my friend: "specialty problems." Trouble is, lots of people think they need an ENT for
their earaches, a pulmonologist for their cough, an allergist for their runny nose, an
dermatologist for their pimples, an orthopedist for their sore back, a neurologist for their
headaches...well, you get the picture. Then they'll turn around and berate medical doctors for not
treating them "as a whole person".
I agree that the definition of "specialty problems" can be a tricky little sucker.
Quoted message said:This isn't about F.P.s "protecting their turf"; it's about the appropriate utilization of limited
and expensive medical resources, and delivering routine care in a timely and personal manner.
No, I'm not talking about turf protection either. I think that the most important thing is making
sure the patient gets the best care, the most appropriate care for the problem at hand. We all have
to be cognizant of appropriate utilization of limited and expensive medical resources. The problem
is in delivering the best care with that concept in mind. It would be unfortunate to not give the
best care possible in the name of saving the system money. I acknowledge that it can be a fine line
to walk, FP's trying to avoid unnecessary consultation vs. "stepping outside their skills". I see
both sides of that coin often enough to make me sympathetic to that pressure, but as a surgeon, I
would much rather consult on a patient unnecessarily than be called in at the 11th hour to deal with
a problem that has now become an emergency. E.G, the closed loop small bowel obstruction that I
consulted on and operated on yesterday who had been in the hospital for 36 hours, or the ruptured
ectopic that had been at another hospital for 12 hours, with my emergent consultation obtained
yesterday after she finally went into shock. And that was just yesterday. I don't really mean to
pick on primary care, since I know that you can provide many cases of surgical misadventures too,
but these very recent experiences color my participation in this thread.
Quoted message said:Do some F.P.s "step outside their skills"? I'm sure they do. Show me one profession that doesn't
have its bad apples.
I agree with this, but since "primary care" is just that, *primary*, there is greater pressure on
those doctors to triage appropriately and therefore probably a greater tendency to err in obtaining
appropriate/timely consultation. This is not meant as a criticism, just an observation of 20 years
of evolution of our health care system.
HMc