In last night's Superstars Jason Queally came good and qualified for the finals, coming second in the heats. Still think it's totally unfair to let people like Jamie Baulch blitz the field in the 800m run, but the cyclists are banned from the bike race. Impressed that the portly snooker player finished the mountain bike event.
Still think it's totally unfair to let people like Jamie Baulch blitz the field in the 800m run, but the cyclists are banned from the bike race.
Indeed. The MTB event has far less in common with Queally's discipline than the 800m 'x-country' does with 400m track. It was hardly xc: a golf course with a few dips and a bit of smooth road. No wonder the runners trashed the opposition.
Still think it's totally unfair to let people like Jamie Baulch blitz the field in the 800m run, but the cyclists are banned from the bike race.
Indeed. The MTB event has far less in common with Queally's discipline than the 800m 'x-country' does with 400m track. It was hardly xc: a golf course with a few dips and a bit of smooth road. No wonder the runners trashed the opposition.
That's what I was was thinking.
So, for the runners, what sort of distances should be excluded?
for any sprinter, I'd say the shortest event I'd let them into would perhaps be 5000m
For a marathon runner, I don't think I'd let them into anything over 400m
So, for the runners, what sort of distances should be excluded?
for any sprinter, I'd say the shortest event I'd let them into would perhaps be 5000m
A sprinter would find anything over 800m fairly tough, I think.
A 100m or 200m runner would, but what about 400 - 1500m runners? they are all going to be pretty handy compared to a non runner in any running event that superstars can throw at them, so I think it's tough on the others allowing them into any running event.
So, for the runners, what sort of distances should be excluded?
for any sprinter, I'd say the shortest event I'd let them into would perhaps be 5000m
A sprinter would find anything over 800m fairly tough, I think. -- Dave...
Not that I'm into running, but I'm with the 5000m view, even then it's dicey really. Runners shouldn't be in running events, especially going by the cyclists examples so far.
500m sprints are the backbone of training for marathon (26 mile) inline skating events. Of course there's a fair amount of endurance work in the week too, but it's speedwork that rules.
"Simonb" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Simon Mason said:
Still think it's totally unfair to let people like Jamie Baulch blitz the field in the 800m run, but the cyclists are banned from the bike race.
Indeed. The MTB event has far less in common with Queally's discipline than the 800m 'x-country' does with 400m track. It was hardly xc: a golf course with a few dips and a bit of smooth road. No wonder the runners trashed the opposition.
I agree entirely - I think a strong letter to the organisers is in order!
A 100m or 200m runner would, but what about 400 - 1500m runners? they are all going to be pretty handy compared to a non runner in any running event that superstars can throw at them, so I think it's tough on the others allowing them into any running event.
Would it not be best to have one of each type of 'their' event to level the playing field out? Might make for less dramatic TV as the winner wouldn't be in doubt, but would also give a handy yardstick to measure the others by.
So, for the runners, what sort of distances should be excluded?
for any sprinter, I'd say the shortest event I'd let them into would perhaps be 5000m
A sprinter would find anything over 800m fairly tough, I think. -- Dave...
Not that I'm into running, but I'm with the 5000m view, even then
it's
Quoted message said:
dicey really. Runners shouldn't be in running events, especially
going
Quoted message said:
by the cyclists examples so far.
500m sprints are the backbone of training for marathon (26 mile)
inline
Quoted message said:
skating events. Of course there's a fair amount of endurance work in the week too, but it's speedwork that rules.
I haven't seen the new series but in the old 70's version a competitor could only be banned from one home event, so if there are 2 running events it would not be fair to ban a runner from both of them. He or she is therefore banned from the one that's most similar to his or her specialist event.
In the original series I remember Bjorn Borg competing with Guy Drut in the 3,000 metres steeplechase. Drut was Olympic 110m hurdles champion at the time and had already had to sit out the 100m sprint. I thought it was a foregone conclusion, and for the first lap Drut led easily. However, Borg closed the gap on him. Every time they came to a barrier Borg leapt it like a centre court net and Drut hurdled it effortlessly gaining about 2 yards in the process. By the last lap both athletes were struggling but when Borg turned on the power in the home straight he left Drut easily.