Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Q about Campy Powertrain Components

Started by Arthur Shapiro · · Last activity · 5 posts · 268 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
6 September 2007
Last activity
7 September 2007
Original author
Arthur Shapiro
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
268
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. A couple weeks ago I asked about the best way of getting some lower gears on
    my Campy Chorus/Record setup, in order to more comfortably / less agonizingly
    tackle some truly grotesque climbs. I got a lot of intelligent responses
    pointing out the good and bad things about a bigger rear cluster, a triple,
    and a compact crank.

    I was reluctant to go with the compact because the only cassette with a 25
    large had only a 12 small cog, and I appreciate currently having a 53x12, even
    if it doesn't get used that much. A 50x12 wouldn't cut it for me.

    All changed last Sunday when a new Campy Serotta appeared on my club ride,
    complete with a 11x25 cluster that I had no idea existed. My eyes grew wide.

    This was also my first view of that newfangled Ultra-Torque BB. This is
    rubbing me that right way as a way of getting a 15% lower low than my 39x25,
    which I'm sure will be adequate for anything I'm likely to climb.

    I guess some questions to the Campy mavens are:

    a). what's the scuttlebutt on the Ultra Torque - legitimately decent product,
    bad news gimmick, or just another way of attacking a problem? I'm kind of
    angry about my Chorus BB, which had to be replaced at 4 years. The local pro
    shop said that wasn't atypical.

    b). If I went this way, I could even get the complete new compact groupset,
    which while expensive certainly is a proportionally better deal than just the
    front powertrain components. What's the difference between Record and Chorus
    these days? I know about the titanium cogs on the cassette, which probably
    isn't great for wear (correct?), but don't comprehend what the $$$ get me on
    the Record.

    c). I'm in no rush; is there anything coming out in the 2008 line that might
    be interesting?

    Thanks for any info.

    Art

  2. (Arthur Shapiro) said:

    A couple weeks ago I asked about the best way of getting some lower gears on
    my Campy Chorus/Record setup, in order to more comfortably / less agonizingly
    tackle some truly grotesque climbs. I got a lot of intelligent responses
    pointing out the good and bad things about a bigger rear cluster, a triple,
    and a compact crank.

    I was reluctant to go with the compact because the only cassette with a 25
    large had only a 12 small cog, and I appreciate currently having a 53x12, even
    if it doesn't get used that much. A 50x12 wouldn't cut it for me.

    All changed last Sunday when a new Campy Serotta appeared on my club ride,
    complete with a 11x25 cluster that I had no idea existed. My eyes grew wide.

    This was also my first view of that newfangled Ultra-Torque BB. This is
    rubbing me that right way as a way of getting a 15% lower low than my 39x25,
    which I'm sure will be adequate for anything I'm likely to climb.

    I guess some questions to the Campy mavens are:

    a). what's the scuttlebutt on the Ultra Torque - legitimately decent product,
    bad news gimmick, or just another way of attacking a problem? I'm kind of
    angry about my Chorus BB, which had to be replaced at 4 years. The local pro
    shop said that wasn't atypical.

    b). If I went this way, I could even get the complete new compact groupset,
    which while expensive certainly is a proportionally better deal than just the
    front powertrain components. What's the difference between Record and Chorus
    these days? I know about the titanium cogs on the cassette, which probably
    isn't great for wear (correct?), but don't comprehend what the $$$ get me on
    the Record.

    c). I'm in no rush; is there anything coming out in the 2008 line that might
    be interesting?

    Thanks for any info.

    Art

    I've got a 50-34 and an 11-25 on my Guerciotti, in Veloce. I'm really
    happy with the gearing choices. I end up with a higher high (120"😉 and
    about the same low (35"😉 as on my Peugeot with a 53-39 and 13-29, but
    smaller steps in between, due to less overlap in the middle, and
    mostly half-steps, so double-shifting can give you some combos unique
    to each ring.

    Guerciotti 34 47.10% 50
    11 81.2 119.5
    9.10%
    12 74.5 109.5
    8.30%
    13 68.7 101.1
    7.70%
    14 63.8 93.9
    7.10%
    15 59.6 87.6
    13.30%
    17 52.6 77.3
    11.80%
    19 47 69.2
    10.50%
    21 42.5 62.6
    9.50%
    23 38.8 57.1
    8.70%
    25 35.7 52.6

    In my experience, the CT FD is [censored]. I couldn't get it to shift to the
    big ring worth beans, even putting the limit screw out far enough to
    worry about the crankarm hitting the cage. I switched to a regular
    double FD and it shifts great. The main change to Campy's 2008 groups
    is going with a single FD for both compact and regular doubles. I'll
    bet that it owes more to the design of the standard double FD than the
    compact. The short cage RD works fine with this setup.

    With that in mind, you could just get the crank/BB cups, a cassette
    (and probably a chain) and you'd be set.

    As for cassette models, well, it's a consumable. I prefer cheap.
    Veloce is only 40g heavier than Centaur, at 2/3 the price. Record, on
    the other hand, is twice the price of Centaur, and only 10g lighter,
    and will last half as long. Centaur seems like a good deal if you want
    light. I only use Veloce cassettes, even on my otherwise Centaur bike.

    Ultratorque has worked fine for me so far. It's very slightly stiffer
    than square taper, and the hirth joint is visible from the star-shaped
    cutout in the BB shell of my Guerciotti - Way cool. I have no
    complaints with square taper, though.

    Check out the prices at http://www.probikekit.com. They're hella cheap
    for Campy stuff, because they're in England, and they ship to the US
    for free. Also check ebay for auctions by eurobikeparts. I got my
    Veloce group from them, and they have good prices and service.

  3. Hank Wirtz said:

    As for cassette models, well, it's a consumable. I prefer cheap.
    Veloce is only 40g heavier than Centaur, at 2/3 the price.

    Mirage is even cheaper and identical with Veloce except for the
    surface treatment of the cogs, which I believe in this case only makes
    a cosmetic difference (and even that only as new or properly scrubbed).

  4. (Arthur Shapiro) said:

    rubbing me that right way as a way of getting a 15% lower low than my 39x25,
    which I'm sure will be adequate for anything I'm likely to climb.

    YMMV, but a 15% lower gear is almost unnoticeable on a steep road for
    average riders. If you are trying to go really fast, it is noticeable.
    But for average riders on a long grinding hill, you are going to wish
    for several additional 15% shifts.

  5. (Arthur Shapiro) said:

    A couple weeks ago I asked about the best way of getting some lower gears on
    my Campy Chorus/Record setup, in order to more comfortably / less agonizingly
    tackle some truly grotesque climbs. I got a lot of intelligent responses
    pointing out the good and bad things about a bigger rear cluster, a triple,
    and a compact crank.

    I was reluctant to go with the compact because the only cassette with a 25
    large had only a 12 small cog, and I appreciate currently having a 53x12, even
    if it doesn't get used that much. A 50x12 wouldn't cut it for me.

    All changed last Sunday when a new Campy Serotta appeared on my club ride,
    complete with a 11x25 cluster that I had no idea existed. My eyes grew wide.

    This was also my first view of that newfangled Ultra-Torque BB. This is
    rubbing me that right way as a way of getting a 15% lower low than my 39x25,
    which I'm sure will be adequate for anything I'm likely to climb.

    I guess some questions to the Campy mavens are:

    a). what's the scuttlebutt on the Ultra Torque - legitimately decent product,
    bad news gimmick, or just another way of attacking a problem? I'm kind of
    angry about my Chorus BB, which had to be replaced at 4 years. The local pro
    shop said that wasn't atypical.

    Couldn't sell square taper BBs, so Campag came up with htis version of
    external bearing BB/crank. Works well, similar stiffness on each
    pedal, unlike othjer systems that have the left arm attach at the end.
    Answers no question, solves no [problem with regerence to square
    taper. 4 years for a BB? Not bad..about $25 per year, pennies per
    month..nothing to get angry about. The days of long lasting BBs are
    gone, have been for decades.

    Quoted message said:


    b). If I went this way, I could even get the complete new compact groupset,
    which while expensive certainly is a proportionally better deal than just the
    front powertrain components. What's the difference between Record and Chorus
    these days?

    Crank is hollow for Record..ti bits in other places..remove the ti,
    foam fill the crank=Chorus.

    I know about the titanium cogs on the cassette, which probably

    Quoted message said:

    isn't great for wear (correct?), but don't comprehend what the $$$ get me on
    the Record.

    See above. Chorus is a bertter value..same stuff, just no ti, a wee
    bit less carbon(RD and FD cage).

    Quoted message said:


    c). I'm in no rush; is there anything coming out in the 2008 line that might
    be interesting?

    One FD for standard and compact, carbon crank for Centaur, more silly
    wheels is all.

    Quoted message said:


    Thanks for any info.

    Art

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.