WAY back in the 70's, rear derailleur cages were essentially flat plates. Now, there tend to be these little tabs, one for each pulley, which make it a pain for my aging fingers to thread a chain through.
Not that I'm going to take a cutter to them or anything, but are these annoying little tabs really necessary?
WAY back in the 70's, rear derailleur cages were essentially flat plates. Now, there tend to be these little tabs, one for each pulley, which make it a pain for my aging fingers to thread a chain through.
Not that I'm going to take a cutter to them or anything, but are these annoying little tabs really necessary?
for the more extreme chain deviations we see today, yes. it stops the potential for the chain bumping off and skipping a pulley.
richard <[email hidden]> wrote in news:B5PQe.292099$_o.19603 @attbi_s71:
Quoted message said:
WAY back in the 70's, rear derailleur cages were essentially flat plates. Now, there tend to be these little tabs, one for each pulley, which make it a pain for my aging fingers to thread a chain through.
Not that I'm going to take a cutter to them or anything, but are these annoying little tabs really necessary?
If you've had a Huret Duopar throw a chain catastrophically when you backpedal and the rear derailleur is just the tiniest bit out of alignment with the cog, then you know the answer.
Unfortunately, harder for chain to come off also means harder to go on. It's a trade-off I'm happy to live with. Your mileage may vary.
WAY back in the 70's, rear derailleur cages were essentially flat plates. Now, there tend to be these little tabs, one for each pulley, which make it a pain for my aging fingers to thread a chain through.
Not that I'm going to take a cutter to them or anything, but are these annoying little tabs really necessary?
Yeah, they're a pain. Especially if you realize after the fact that you've put the chain on the outside of one. I wonder if they couldn't at least make them a little bit shorter so you could squeeze the chain past.