Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Pulley cages - why so complicated?

Started by richard · · Last activity · 6 posts · 418 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
30 August 2005
Last activity
31 August 2005
Original author
richard
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
418
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. WAY back in the 70's, rear derailleur cages were essentially flat
    plates. Now, there tend to be these little tabs, one for each pulley,
    which make it a pain for my aging fingers to thread a chain through.

    Not that I'm going to take a cutter to them or anything, but are these
    annoying little tabs really necessary?

  2. I imagine they are there to keep the chain on the pulleys when things
    don't go right while shifting.

    Just the same, it would be interesting to know if they ever actually
    come into play. If you do cut them off, please post the results here.

    Thanks!

  3. richard said:

    WAY back in the 70's, rear derailleur cages were essentially flat
    plates. Now, there tend to be these little tabs, one for each pulley,
    which make it a pain for my aging fingers to thread a chain through.

    Not that I'm going to take a cutter to them or anything, but are these
    annoying little tabs really necessary?

    for the more extreme chain deviations we see today, yes. it stops the
    potential for the chain bumping off and skipping a pulley.

  4. richard <[email hidden]> wrote in news:B5PQe.292099$_o.19603
    @attbi_s71:

    Quoted message said:

    WAY back in the 70's, rear derailleur cages were essentially flat
    plates. Now, there tend to be these little tabs, one for each pulley,
    which make it a pain for my aging fingers to thread a chain through.

    Not that I'm going to take a cutter to them or anything, but are these
    annoying little tabs really necessary?

    If you've had a Huret Duopar throw a chain catastrophically when you
    backpedal and the rear derailleur is just the tiniest bit out of alignment
    with the cog, then you know the answer.

    Unfortunately, harder for chain to come off also means harder to go on.
    It's a trade-off I'm happy to live with. Your mileage may vary.

    -HW

  5. richard said:

    WAY back in the 70's, rear derailleur cages were essentially flat
    plates. Now, there tend to be these little tabs, one for each pulley,
    which make it a pain for my aging fingers to thread a chain through.

    Not that I'm going to take a cutter to them or anything, but are these
    annoying little tabs really necessary?

    Yeah, they're a pain. Especially if you realize after the fact that
    you've put the chain on the outside of one. I wonder if they couldn't at
    least make them a little bit shorter so you could squeeze the chain past.

    Derek Hodges

  6. and the new ones are reversyble
    but less malleable. good steel is now mil spec.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.