Power meters · Public discussion

PT avg. speed not accurate

Started by D-Yob · · Last activity · 10 posts · 1,429 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Power meters
Published
19 July 2006
Last activity
23 July 2006
Original author
D-Yob
Posts
10
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,429
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–10 of 10
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I have a PT SL and I've been noticing the average speed on the display is off. Today, I rode three hours and turned a little over 55 miles, an 18-mph-plus average. My display read 16.9 mph at the end of the ride.

    However, when I download my file, I get the accurate average speed. Any ideas as to what could be the problem?

    --Dean

  2. The difference is likely explained by differences in how your PTU CPU and your PC application are handling zeros. The CPU has a setup function to define this (Setup 3). I don't know about your PC software. Of course, if you were moving the entire duration, this isn't the explanation. But, a typical 3-hr ride has multiple stops when speed is zero (e.g., at least 5mins?).

  3. It could also be a problem involving the interval function of the unit (inadvertantly switching the unit into, or out of, interval mode). When you saw 16.9mph, did you also view the distance as 55mi and the time as 3hr?

  4. Thanks for the replies.

    1) Yes, I did stop completely twice and the computer did go into sleep mode. (once for a flat and the other to get more liquid.) In setup, I noticed I have it in the "yes 0's'' function.

    2) I did use the interval mode for 2x20-minute sweet spot intervals. Avg. speed is right. It's also right on my last 30 endurance miles.

    So, is my setup wrong? Should I switch to "no 0's''?

    --Dean

  5. D-Yob said:

    1) Yes, I did stop completely twice and the computer did go into sleep mode. (once for a flat and the other to get more liquid.) In setup, I noticed I have it in the "yes 0's'' function.

    2) I did use the interval mode for 2x20-minute sweet spot intervals. Avg. speed is right. It's also right on my last 30 endurance miles.

    So, is my setup wrong? Should I switch to "no 0's''?

    Yes, if you want to exclude stops from the avg speed computation.

  6. Aren't there 2 setup options: 1) include zeroes while cadence is zero, and 2) include zeroes when speed is zero? I think I'm yes on #1, and no on #2.

  7. The strange thing, is that if the difference is explained by not including zeros in the avg calculation displayed, it should result into the recorded data to be lowered than the displayed data, not the opposite.

    D-Yob said:

    I rode three hours and turned a little over 55 miles, an 18-mph-plus average. My display read 16.9 mph at the end of the ride.

    So this here is very unlikely explainable by the 0s setting.

  8. Thanks for the advice. I changed my speed setting to "no to 0's'' and now I'm getting correct average speeds, even when I stop during rides.

    Just curious: Why would you want to have it average 0's in? Don't you always want to see what your average moving speed is? I also changed my watts and cadence to no to 0's.

    --Dean

  9. D-Yob said:

    I also changed my watts and cadence to no to 0's.

    This will overstate your power and cadence numbers. The speed issue is different from power and cadence. For speed, zero means you're stopped. But, for watts and cadence, zero doesn't mean you're stopped.

  10. RapDaddyo said:

    This will overstate your power and cadence numbers. The speed issue is different from power and cadence. For speed, zero means you're stopped. But, for watts and cadence, zero doesn't mean you're stopped.


    That makes sense. I think I'll change the watts and cadence back to yes 0. Thanks.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.