Road Cycling · Public discussion

Professional cyclist 2003

Started by Rik Van Diesel · · Last activity · 11 posts · 1,827 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
23 January 2003
Last activity
29 January 2003
Original author
Rik Van Diesel
Posts
11
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,827
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–11 of 11
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Professional (pre fesh'e nl)adj. 1.following an occupation as a means of livelihood. ......11. a
    person who earns a living in a sport or other occupation frequently engagaed by amateurs. ....Random
    House 1997 College edition

    Random House just called 90% of the cyclist in the US Amateurs. Unless living off your
    girlfriend/family and trying to deposit Powerbars in your bank account to pay bills can be called
    earning a living.

    RVD Hater of all these faux Pro's. Faux Pro Go Slow.

  2. Listen RVD (and damn if I'm still procrastinating- it's gonna be 7 before I'm done with the ride
    tonight)- let's just welcome everyone to the sport. It doesn't matter if their license says pro or
    amateur. The fact is most Cat1's that want to be pro just want it so they can get into the five
    coolest races in the USA. And there is nothing wrong with that. As far as pro team riders not
    getting a salary, that is too bad. It is the economics of bike racing. I wish it were different. Now
    lets SUAR, with a smile. "Rik Van Diesel" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Professional (pre fesh'e nl)adj. 1.following an occupation as a means of livelihood. ......11. a
    person who earns a living in a sport or other occupation frequently engagaed by amateurs.
    ....Random House 1997 College edition

    Random House just called 90% of the cyclist in the US Amateurs. Unless living off your
    girlfriend/family and trying to deposit Powerbars in your bank account to pay bills can be called
    earning a living.

    RVD Hater of all these faux Pro's. Faux Pro Go Slow.

  3. Amateurs do it for love, Pro's do it to make a living. But I bet pro bike racers love their jobs
    more than all us Cat 1's and 2's love ours. Greg

  4. "John Lieswyn" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<6aGX9.1104$_s4.112@rwcrnsc54>...

    Quoted message said:

    Listen RVD (and damn if I'm still procrastinating- it's gonna be 7 before I'm done with the ride
    tonight)- let's just welcome everyone to the sport. It doesn't matter if their license says pro or
    amateur. The fact is most Cat1's that want to be pro just want it so they can get into the five
    coolest races in the USA. And there is nothing wrong with that. As far as pro team riders not
    getting a salary, that is too bad. It is the economics of bike racing. I wish it were different.
    Now lets SUAR, with a smile.

    Johnny L,

    Guys would like to go to the TDF, but it doesn't make sense if you can't finish a NRC race. Every
    time I turn around another kid is going to some D3 team because they are under 27, not because they
    are lighting the world on fire. This effects your cash earning potential because "ghost" riders
    (they usually get something of cash value from the team eg. bike) take away from your salary
    dollars, and take talent from amateur teams just because of the allure of being called "PRO". Then
    they don't get to develop because they don't get picked for the races (lack of talent), or they are
    some broke ass D3 team who runs out of cash at Seaotter (lack of cash), and only does a local
    programs ( Definition of an amateur team)…. Side note pro teams run out of cash at Corestates…..
    These things bug me. It makes it harder to run an amateur program because there is marketing value
    in being "PRO" even if you don't have the cash to do a great program, and it slows the development
    of these riders. Basically I hate the age limit on the D3 teams, that there is no minimum salary for
    riders, and that most of these guys would rather race for a "pro" team with no money than an amateur
    team. I will see you at the races, and I will try and get over my bitterness.

    RVD

  5. "Rik Van Diesel" <.google.com...

    Quoted message said:

    "John Lieswyn" <jlieswyn$_s4.112@rwcrnsc54>...

    Quoted message said:

    Listen RVD (and damn if I'm still procrastinating- it's gonna be 7


    before

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I'm done with the ride tonight)- let's just welcome everyone to the


    sport.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    It doesn't matter if their license says pro or amateur. The fact is


    most

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Cat1's that want to be pro just want it so they can get into the five coolest races in the USA.
    And there is nothing wrong with that. As far


    as

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    pro team riders not getting a salary, that is too bad. It is the


    economics

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    of bike racing. I wish it were different. Now lets SUAR, with a smile.

    Johnny L,

    Guys would like to go to the TDF, but it doesn't make sense if you can't finish a NRC race. Every
    time I turn around another kid is going to some D3 team because they are under 27, not because
    they are lighting the world on fire. This effects your cash earning potential because "ghost"
    riders (they usually get something of cash value from the team eg. bike) take away from your
    salary dollars, and take talent from amateur teams just because of the allure of being called
    "PRO". Then they don't get to develop because they don't get picked for the races (lack of
    talent), or they are some broke ass D3 team who runs out of cash at Seaotter (lack of cash), and
    only does a local programs ( Definition of an amateur team).. Side note pro teams run out of cash
    at Corestates... These things bug me. It makes it harder to run an amateur program because there
    is marketing value in being "PRO" even if you don't have the cash to do a great program, and it
    slows the development of these riders. Basically I hate the age limit on the D3 teams, that there
    is no minimum salary for riders, and that most of these guys would rather race for a "pro" team
    with no money than an amateur team. I will see you at the races, and I will try and get over my
    bitterness.

    Ahhh...... the friendly, smiling face of anonymity.

    Quoted message said:


    RVD

  6. "Ken Papai" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:1RYX9.12492$6G4.4543@sccrnsc02...

    Quoted message said:


    "Rik Van Diesel" <.google.com...

    Quoted message said:

    "John Lieswyn" <jlieswyn$_s4.112@rwcrnsc54>...

    Quoted message said:

    Listen RVD (and damn if I'm still procrastinating- it's gonna be 7


    before

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I'm done with the ride tonight)- let's just welcome everyone to the


    sport.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    It doesn't matter if their license says pro or amateur. The fact is


    most

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Cat1's that want to be pro just want it so they can get into the five coolest races in the
    USA. And there is nothing wrong with that. As


    far

    Quoted message said:

    as

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    pro team riders not getting a salary, that is too bad. It is the


    economics

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    of bike racing. I wish it were different. Now lets SUAR, with a


    smile.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Johnny L,

    Guys would like to go to the TDF, but it doesn't make sense if you can't finish a NRC race.
    Every time I turn around another kid is going to some D3 team because they are under 27, not
    because they are lighting the world on fire. This effects your cash earning potential because
    "ghost" riders (they usually get something of cash value from the team eg. bike) take away from
    your salary dollars, and take talent from amateur teams just because of the allure of being
    called "PRO". Then they don't get to develop because they don't get picked for the races (lack
    of talent), or they are some broke ass D3 team who runs out of cash at Seaotter (lack of cash),
    and only does a local programs ( Definition of an amateur team).. Side note pro teams run out of
    cash at Corestates... These things bug me. It makes it harder to run an amateur program because
    there is marketing value in being "PRO" even if you don't have the cash to do a great program,
    and it slows the development of these riders. Basically I hate the age limit on the D3 teams,
    that there is no minimum salary for riders, and that most of these guys would rather race for a
    "pro" team with no money than an amateur team. I will see you at the races, and I will try and
    get over my bitterness.

    Ahhh...... the friendly, smiling face of anonymity.

    What the [censored] does it matter, jackass? RVD is having a completely intelligent conversation with John
    L. irregardless of his anonymity.

    Thanks, Ronde Champ
    Mr. Anonymous

  7. "ronde champ" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Ken Papai" <ken.4543@sccrnsc02...

    Quoted message said:


    "Rik Van Diesel" <.google.com...

    Quoted message said:

    "John Lieswyn" <jlieswyn$_s4.112@rwcrnsc54>...
    > Listen RVD (and damn if I'm still procrastinating- it's gonna be 7


    before

    Quoted message said:

    > I'm done with the ride tonight)- let's just welcome everyone to the


    sport.

    Quoted message said:

    > It doesn't matter if their license says pro or amateur. The fact is


    most

    Quoted message said:

    > Cat1's that want to be pro just want it so they can get into the


    five

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > coolest races in the USA. And there is nothing wrong with that. As


    far

    Quoted message said:

    as

    Quoted message said:

    > pro team riders not getting a salary, that is too bad. It is the


    economics

    Quoted message said:

    > of bike racing. I wish it were different. Now lets SUAR, with a


    smile.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Johnny L,

    Guys would like to go to the TDF, but it doesn't make sense if you can't finish a NRC race.
    Every time I turn around another kid is going to some D3 team because they are under 27, not
    because they are lighting the world on fire. This effects your cash earning potential because
    "ghost" riders (they usually get something of cash value from the team eg. bike) take away
    from your salary dollars, and take talent from amateur teams just because of the allure of
    being called "PRO". Then they don't get to develop because they don't get picked for the races
    (lack of talent), or they are some broke ass D3 team who runs out of cash at Seaotter (lack of
    cash), and only does a local programs ( Definition of an amateur team).. Side note pro teams
    run out of cash at Corestates... These things bug me. It makes it harder to run an amateur
    program because there is marketing value in being "PRO" even if you don't have the cash to do
    a great program, and it slows the development of these riders. Basically I hate the age limit
    on the D3 teams, that there is no minimum salary for riders, and that most of these guys would
    rather race for a "pro" team with no money than an amateur team. I will see you at the races,
    and I will try and get over my bitterness.

    Ahhh...... the friendly, smiling face of anonymity.

    What the [censored] does it matter, jackass? RVD is having a completely intelligent conversation with
    John L. irregardless of his anonymity.

    Thanks, Ronde Champ
    Mr. Anonymous

    Robbie... I just call a spade a spade.

    Sorry you're all upset!

    -KJP

  8. ronde champ said:

    RVD is having a completely intelligent conversation...

    For you maybe.

  9. Quoted message said:

    Guys would like to go to the TDF, but it doesn't make sense if you can't finish a NRC race. Every
    time I turn around another kid is going to some D3 team because they are under 27, not because
    they are lighting the world on fire. This effects your cash earning potential because "ghost"
    riders (they usually get something of cash value from the team eg. bike) take away from your
    salary dollars, and take talent from amateur teams just because of the allure of being called
    "PRO". Then they don't get to develop because they don't get picked for the races (lack of
    talent), or they are some broke ass D3 team who runs out of cash at Seaotter (lack of cash), and
    only does a local programs ( Definition of an amateur team)…. Side note pro teams run out of
    cash at Corestates….. These things bug me. It makes it harder to run an amateur program
    because there is marketing value in being "PRO" even if you don't have the cash to do a great
    program, and it slows the development of these riders. Basically I hate the age limit on the D3
    teams, that there is no minimum salary for riders, and that most of these guys would rather race
    for a "pro" team with no money than an amateur team. I will see you at the races, and I will try
    and get over my bitterness.

    I spent the last couple years on D3 teams (NetZero and Schroeder Iron) and while I see your point, I
    would have to say it was an awesome experience and I got to learn from some great bike racers that
    taught me things you'd never learn on an amateur team. Two Cents, Ryan Barrett

    Quoted message said:


    RVD

  10. "Ryan Barrett" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    I spent the last couple years on D3 teams (NetZero and Schroeder Iron) and while I see your point,
    I would have to say it was an awesome experience and I got to learn from some great bike racers
    that taught me things you'd never learn on an amateur team. Two Cents, Ryan Barrett

    The difference is that you're not a tool like some of the new guys coming out this year.

    I must say though that the first time I saw your form it looked like you were riding a
    stairmaster/rowing machine/mideval torture device.

    At least you've got some wattage.

  11. "Kurgan Gringioni" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:


    The difference is that you're not a tool like some of the new guys coming out this year.

    I must say though that the first time I saw your form it looked like you were riding a
    stairmaster/rowing machine/mideval torture device.

    At least you've got some wattage.

    Well, I am kind of a tool and the wattage ain't all that great, but thanks for commenting on
    my form. It's not the first time someone has mentioned it, but it may be the best description
    I've heard.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.