Paul Saunders said:Although I've heard that the Laser can stand up well to strong winds, I'm
not yet convinced. But I haven't yet used it in really strong winds yet.
Well, there's strong winds, and there's strong winds... Force 6 is
a pretty strong wind by a lot of standards, but other people
might define "strong" as "gale force", or even high gale force.
Also, define "stand up well"... I've yet to have my Spacepacker
taken out, and it's been through (I guess) Force 8 in exposed
locations. But it was no fun inside, and every now and again the
pole would bend down and whack the occupants on the head. OTOH it
did stay up and wasn't damaged (even if the pole came out a rather
different shape to that in which it went in!) and I was remarkably
impressed that it did, but if you're comparing "standing up well"
to what a Quasar can do it's just not playing in the same league.
You pays your money (or pack weight) and you takes your choice.
I would expect a Laser to stand up to /most/ of what the UK will
throw at it, especially if pitched well in sheltered locations.
How often does one camp in the "danger zone"? I've had, I'd guess,
half a dozen really worryingly windy nights in ~20 years of fairly
regular camping in lightweight tents: most of the stuff we use
these days is fairly over-specified for what it gets used for.
Quoted message said:My gut feeling is that the Laser wins on light weight, but the Akto probably
wins on ruggedness. The headroom is lower in the Akto and I think it's a
little more aerodynamic, and is probably stronger due to its heavier weight,
so I'd go for that if you plan to use it in a lot of rough weather.
It's not just wind that deserves ruggedness. Take a look at the
groundsheets and you'll find Hilleberg's idea of "ultralight" is
thicker than Terra Nova's, and a tougher groundsheet will last
longer and allow a freer choice of pitch. As Hilleberg's catalogue
points out, they could make tents lighter, but have chosen a
certain degree of strength to stop at. I think that point is
higher than TN's for ultralights, but that's a difference rather
than a good/bad thing, and it's what helps the Laser weigh in at
less. If you're doing the odd few night's camping the TN may make
more sense, a prolonged trip then Hilleberg's way may seem preferable.
Quoted message said:Otherwise the Laser is better for sitting up in, particularly if you're
tall,
Worth checking this out by sitting in a pitched example. If the
Akto has enough then I doubt the laser would be better, as enough
is enough, but if it hasn't then it'll be a constant source of
annoyance.
Pete.
--
Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/