Dietmar said:Ah well, that may be in the eye of the beholder, may it not? Whether or not a certain piece of prose appears clear to someone certainly does depend on that person's grasp of the language in question, doesn't it?
See, there you go again, "drawing conclusions". Although it is certainly my pleasure to engage in an argument with a literate person, didn't I tell you to lay off of your attempts at the art of drawing inferences from limited data? 🙄
Well, let's just say that I have written many hundreds of pages in my professional life, which have been published in books and journals. I'll grant you that I do not typically write about bicycle mechanics, but of all the editors and reviewers judging my writing you are in fact the first one to complain about the clarity, or rather the lack thereof, of my writing. Shall I now proceed to draw some conclusions from that? 😄
O.k., seriously now, I have no desire to engage in pointless argument with you. As you might have guessed, my time is too valuable for that. 😉
I do admit that the style of your initial response to my post did bother me, for reasons that I have made clear, and that maybe my response was unnecessarily harsh. I apologize if that is so. I propose to end this argument at this point, at least from my side, but feel free to add any comments of yours that you feel are necessary.
Chicago Public School? Latin School? Suburban School? You didn't complete your CV for us!
I've said it before, and I'll say it again -- literacy is the responsibility of the reader AND the writer. Let me add:
[center]"Words without meaning never to heaven go."[/center]
FWIW. I've read some poorly written stuff in "professional" journals. :eek:
If you abbreviate your thoughts because you think you are being clear beyond exception, then you are in error.
If you think tossing out a minimalist statement is meaningful in-and-of-itself, you are mistaken; particularly, if the remark does not in part address the original question -- not whether it was worth your time, but whether a fee was a going rate based on what others thought ...
If you toss out a cocktail-party remark, then you have to be willing to defend it.
If you make a flip remark, and aren't willing to defend it, then who is to blame?
Too bad you couldn't comprehend my queries which you chose to take as absolute statements.
The ONLY statement I originally made was that if you go to Church/Temple/whatever that "I hope you're dropping MORE THAN $60 in the collection plate each week based on your notion of time & money."
Literacy? I guess I didn't take into account he to whom I was writing -- the fault, therefore, is MINE.
"So it is said, so it is written ..."