On 16 Mar 2005 21:21:40 -0800, "JeffWills" <[email hidden]> may
have said:
Werehatrack said:Quoted message said:OTOH- I've never seen a pedantic VW. I have seen a Hebmüller
though:
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:http://www.thehebregistry.com/
Hate to one-up you, but I've sold parts for one. (In a previous
decade, I was a VW dealer parts manager for several years.)
Ah, so. My question to you is: which is tougher to work on- an old VW
or a bicycle?
I spent several years selling VW parts over-the-counter at an
independant auto parts store. That job supported me through a battered
'71 Squareback and a '61 crewcab pickup. I found them easier to work on
than bicycles... bicycles always required "tuning", where the VW's
simply required bolting on parts in roughly the right place.
Bikes are far easier to work on; there's at least an entire order of
magnitude of difference in complexity. But then, I used to do a lot
more with an engine overhaul than any of my competitors; case
line-boring, head flycutting, sometimes even cylinder seat machining,
none of which was commonly done by others. By comparison, the number
of things that are mandatory in order to get a serviceable result on a
bike is much smaller. I can assemble a complete mtb in an afternoon
from bits I've got laying around. I'd only be able to do the engine
for a Bug in that time if I already had the parts prepped and ready to
go beforehand, and if it was for a fuel injected automatic stickshift
convertible with air, it would take damned near as long to hang that
beast in the car as to put it together.
Sometimes I miss working on VWs, and occasionally I yearn for my old
two-liter Beetle, but then I go for a spin on a bike or take the
Escort out for a little corner-straightening, and the nostalgia
evaporates.
--
My email address is antispammed; pull WEEDS if replying via e-mail.
Typoes are not a bug, they're a feature.
Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.