Landis had a 1:07 advantage over Sastre in the first time trial.
Projecting based on that, Landis will have a 55 second lead starting the final stage.
If that happens, then I think it is a pretty good bet that Sastre will attempt a breakout on Sunday.
In 1987 when the margin was 40 seconds, a breakout was attempted.
I think this Sunday's stage will be far more exciting than 1989. Three guys, all with the absolutely realistic chances of taking the win, duking it out.
I can not believe how the two Spaniards are already saying they've lost all hope for a GC win. The Spanish can be such wussies sometimes. Maybe they can blame air conditioners.
Landis had a 1:07 advantage over Sastre in the first time trial.
Projecting based on that, Landis will have a 55 second lead starting the final stage.
If that happens, then I think it is a pretty good bet that Sastre will attempt a breakout on Sunday.
In 1987 when the margin was 40 seconds, a breakout was attempted.
I think this Sunday's stage will be far more exciting than 1989. Three guys, all with the absolutely realistic chances of taking the win, duking it out.
I can not believe how the two Spaniards are already saying they've lost all hope for a GC win. The Spanish can be such wussies sometimes. Maybe they can blame air conditioners.
Probabaly a bit of misinformation. I cannot believe those teams are not plotting. Or, at least, they will be plotting in earnest after they know the TT results.
Landis had a 1:07 advantage over Sastre in the first time trial.
Projecting based on that, Landis will have a 55 second lead starting the final stage.
If that happens, then I think it is a pretty good bet that Sastre will attempt a breakout on Sunday.
In 1987 when the margin was 40 seconds, a breakout was attempted.
I think this Sunday's stage will be far more exciting than 1989. Three guys, all with the absolutely realistic chances of taking the win, duking it out.
I can not believe how the two Spaniards are already saying they've lost all hope for a GC win. The Spanish can be such wussies sometimes. Maybe they can blame air conditioners.
Probabaly a bit of misinformation. I cannot believe those teams are not plotting. Or, at least, they will be plotting in earnest after they know the TT results.
You can bet they've all ordered in cases of Amstel Light in place of the usual pitchers of sangria.
Landis had a 1:07 advantage over Sastre in the first time trial.
Projecting based on that, Landis will have a 55 second lead starting the final stage.
If that happens, then I think it is a pretty good bet that Sastre will attempt a breakout on Sunday.
In 1987 when the margin was 40 seconds, a breakout was attempted.
I think this Sunday's stage will be far more exciting than 1989. Three guys, all with the absolutely realistic chances of taking the win, duking it out.
I can not believe how the two Spaniards are already saying they've lost all hope for a GC win. The Spanish can be such wussies sometimes. Maybe they can blame air conditioners.
Landis also said he had lost the tour, so he must be a "wussie" too.
Landis had a 1:07 advantage over Sastre in the first time trial.
Projecting based on that, Landis will have a 55 second lead starting the final stage.
If that happens, then I think it is a pretty good bet that Sastre will attempt a breakout on Sunday.
That would be a first !
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
In 1987 when the margin was 40 seconds, a breakout was attempted.
By Delgado ?!
"In 1987, with Stephen Roche leading Pedro Delgado by only 40 seconds after the final time trial, Delgado broke away from the peloton on the Champs-Elysées, threatening to [censored] victory at the last minute. (In fact he was caught, he and Roche both finished in the peloton, and Roche thereby won the Tour.)"