"David Kerber" <ns_dkerber@ns_ids.net> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:In article <c6Jbc.175510$_w.1818109@attbi_s53>,
[email hidden] says...
Quoted message said:"David Kerber" <ns_dkerber@ns_ids.net> wrote
Quoted message said:
You can buy or make a trailer which could handle some
pretty heavy
loads
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Quoted message said:if your bike had low enough gears, but in general I
agree that there
are
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Quoted message said:some jobs which are better left to a _motor_ vehicle.
Yeah, but that doesn't mean you have to own it (or even
drive it). Many
lumber
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:yards and nurseries deliver, supermarkets, too.
True, and I never said you did. Home Depot will rent you a
truck by the hour if you buy something too big to fit in
your own vehicle.
I'm appending to David's message since I was about to make
the same point.
If you have a lot of really bulky stuff you might prefer to
rent anyway, to minimize the number of trips and the
possible superficial damage to your vehicle.
I might haul a bunch of bags of dirt once every other year,
a 4 x 8 sheet of plywood even less often. Everybody will
have their own answer to these questions, and can calculate
at what point the economic and hassle equation makes it more
reasonable to own than to rent. For most people, groceries
are the most common large item ferried, and there are a
number of ways to deal with groceries.
In the US, where the average number of vehicles per
household is higher than the average number of drivers,
there's a much easier equation going on: Can we live with
one less car? (and one less set of car payments /
insurance, etc.) That's a heck of a lot easier to do, and
in a family situation involves few lifestyle changes by
other family members.