UK and Europe · Public discussion

powerlinks

Started by davek · · Last activity · 28 posts · 834 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
22 February 2006
Last activity
23 February 2006
Original author
davek
Posts
28
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
834
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–28 of 28
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 10:43:04 +0000, Peter Clinch <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    davek said:

    Anyway, had an interesting chat with LBS man - he said, contrary to what
    I have been told in the past in this NG, that Powerlinks are not meant
    to be re-used.

    Well, according to the manual my fully suspended built-like-a-tank bike
    isn't "meant" to be ridden down kerbs as it is DANGEROUS.

    Sometimes unavoidable.

    If your twuntish council end a shared use path in such a way that there is no
    let down at the end, and to reach the nearest one you would need to ride 20'
    illegally along the pavement.

    I suppose you could dismount.

    Yeah, right.

  2. in message <[email hidden]>, davek

    (') said:

    LBS was out of replacement Powerlinks, so I got a Taya Sigma connector
    instead. It was a devil to fit - just flex the chain a little until it
    snaps into place? Yeah, right! But it looks sturdy enough - anyone have
    any experience of this make?

    Yup.

    Quoted message said:

    Reliable?

    Fiddly, difficult to undo. Gave up on them and went back to SRAM.

    Quoted message said:

    Anyway, had an interesting chat with LBS man - he said, contrary to
    what I have been told in the past in this NG, that Powerlinks are not
    meant to be re-used. This surprised me. His explanation sounded
    plausible - that the constant "clicking" in and out weakens the
    securing part of the link, but I wonder how much this matters if the
    chain is kept under tension during use. So, does he have a point, or is
    he talking out of his fundament?

    In my experience SRAM magic links have a pretty good reusability rate.
    I'm now using a Wipperman Connex link on my ten-speed roadbike chain,
    and thus far I'm impressed with it - if anything it may be better than
    the SRAM.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    Hobbit ringleader gives Sauron One in the Eye.

  3. Paul said:
    Quoted message said:

    Well, according to the manual my fully suspended built-like-a-tank bike
    isn't "meant" to be ridden down kerbs as it is DANGEROUS.

    Sometimes unavoidable.

    If your twuntish council end a shared use path in such a way that there is no
    let down at the end, and to reach the nearest one you would need to ride 20'
    illegally along the pavement.

    Easily avoidable if you stay off the shared use path in the first
    place.

    --
    Dave...

  4. in message <[email hidden]>, davek

    (') said:

    David Martin wrote:
    Sigma connectors are good because you can hook

    Quoted message said:

    both ends of the chain together very easily,

    This is true. I always manage to let go of my chain several times
    before getting a Powerlink together...

    A little piece of stiff bent wire (as supplied with my Topeak Alien multi
    tool, but it isn't difficult to make your own) hooked in the chain one
    link on either side of the join takes the strain off and makes the power
    link very easy to install/remove.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/
    Ring of great evil
    Small one casts it into flame
    Bringing rise of Men ;; gonzoron

  5. dkahn400 said:
    Paul said:
    Quoted message said:

    Well, according to the manual my fully suspended built-like-a-tank bike
    isn't "meant" to be ridden down kerbs as it is DANGEROUS.

    Sometimes unavoidable.

    If your twuntish council end a shared use path in such a way that there is no
    let down at the end, and to reach the nearest one you would need to ride 20'
    illegally along the pavement.

    Easily avoidable if you stay off the shared use path in the first
    place.

    Ah, but this one provides a useful shortcut under a railway line and there is no
    normal road equivelant.

    Motorised vehicles have to negotiate two mini roundabouts and a set of traffic
    lights to get from one end to the other. (Poor little soldiers)

  6. "Simon Brooke" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    in message <[email hidden]>, davek

    (') said:

    LBS was out of replacement Powerlinks, so I got a Taya Sigma connector
    instead. It was a devil to fit - just flex the chain a little until it
    snaps into place? Yeah, right! But it looks sturdy enough - anyone have
    any experience of this make?

    Yup.

    Quoted message said:

    Reliable?

    Fiddly, difficult to undo. Gave up on them and went back to SRAM.

    Quoted message said:

    Anyway, had an interesting chat with LBS man - he said, contrary to
    what I have been told in the past in this NG, that Powerlinks are not
    meant to be re-used. This surprised me. His explanation sounded
    plausible - that the constant "clicking" in and out weakens the
    securing part of the link, but I wonder how much this matters if the
    chain is kept under tension during use. So, does he have a point, or is
    he talking out of his fundament?

    In my experience SRAM magic links have a pretty good reusability rate.
    I'm now using a Wipperman Connex link on my ten-speed roadbike chain,
    and thus far I'm impressed with it - if anything it may be better than
    the SRAM.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    Hobbit ringleader gives Sauron One in the Eye.

    All this about removing Powerlinks, it#s no big deal ... I invested about a
    tenner with Wiggle and bought a special pair of pliers made by Park designed
    to remove them - easy, and no problem in re-using the links (although I tend
    to use a new one with a new chain - and keep the old one as an "on the road"
    spare)

    Get the pliers - problem solved!

    RG


  7. Quoted message said:
    Anthony Jones said:

    Apologies if this method is self-evident. 🙂

    Not to me it wasn't, but it sounds good. I shall bear it in mind for
    next time, thanks.

    Quoted message said:

    Alternatively, Jobst Brandt describes another technique here:

    http://yarchive.net/bike/power_link.html

    But I've always found that more fiddly than the one described above.

    Yes.... I'm not entirely sure I follow it.

    Looking at it, its the same method I've always used.

    Grab the chain below the link so its stuck up
    __
    | |
    | |
    _______| |________

    Then from the top squeeze the opposite corners of the link with pliers to
    release it.

    Steve

  8. In article said:

    LBS was out of replacement Powerlinks, so I got a Taya Sigma connector
    instead. It was a devil to fit - just flex the chain a little until it
    snaps into place? Yeah, right! But it looks sturdy enough - anyone have
    any experience of this make? Reliable?

    Used one once. It broke.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.