Pound Speaking At URI Next Week

Sooo... Are you going to attend, and ask the tough questions? Like,
"when will the testing protocols be opened to public scrutiny", that
sort of thing? Just curious. --D-y

Ask him about the "other half of the connection"...So Verbruggen
supplied the documents that linked the code numbers to Armstrong.

Ask him "who at the lab supplied the reporters with the information
that said 'sample xxxxxx tested positive' ?"

Pound is being just as pompous as Verbruggen. His lack of objectivity
is astounding. It's a real shame, because he's not helping the
anti-dope movement at all by being so elusive.

<[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Sooo... Are you going to attend, and ask the tough questions? Like,
"when will the testing protocols be opened to public scrutiny", that
sort of thing? Just curious. --D-y

I think you should attend and ask the questions that are burning in your
little brain. As for the one you pose, that's been asked and answered.
Have a great evening.

B. Lafferty said:

<[email hidden]>wrote:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Sooo... Are you going to attend, and ask the tough questions? Like,
"when will the testing protocols be opened to public scrutiny", that
sort of thing? Just curious. --D-y

B.L. replied:

Quoted message said:

I think you should attend and ask the questions that are burning in your
little brain. As for the one you pose, that's been asked and answered.
Have a great evening.

Gee I missed that answer. Could it have been "never" by any chance?

"How many experts were you prepared to hire to find Tyler guilty?"
might be another.

My "little brain"? At least not crowded by an obsession based on
personal* dislike, Brian.

*not actually since you've never had any face-to-face encounters,
correct?

Gosh, it's been too long since we talked, you know? --D-y

<[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

B. Lafferty said:

<[email hidden]>wrote:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Sooo... Are you going to attend, and ask the tough questions? Like,
"when will the testing protocols be opened to public scrutiny", that
sort of thing? Just curious. --D-y

B.L. replied:

Quoted message said:

I think you should attend and ask the questions that are burning in your
little brain. As for the one you pose, that's been asked and answered.
Have a great evening.

Gee I missed that answer. Could it have been "never" by any chance?

"How many experts were you prepared to hire to find Tyler guilty?"
might be another.

My "little brain"? At least not crowded by an obsession based on
personal* dislike, Brian.

*not actually since you've never had any face-to-face encounters,
correct?

Gosh, it's been too long since we talked, you know? --D-y

Enjoy your evening. :-)

<[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

B. Lafferty said:

<[email hidden]>wrote:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Sooo... Are you going to attend, and ask the tough questions? Like,
"when will the testing protocols be opened to public scrutiny", that
sort of thing? Just curious. --D-y

B.L. replied:

Quoted message said:

I think you should attend and ask the questions that are burning in your
little brain. As for the one you pose, that's been asked and answered.
Have a great evening.

Gee I missed that answer. Could it have been "never" by any chance?

"How many experts were you prepared to hire to find Tyler guilty?"
might be another.

Here's one you might ask yourself, "How many experts was Hamilton prepared
to hire to concoct some cockamamie defense?"

B. Lafferty said:

<[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Sooo... Are you going to attend, and ask the tough questions? Like,
"when will the testing protocols be opened to public scrutiny", that
sort of thing? Just curious. --D-y

Quoted message said:

I think you should attend and ask the questions that are burning in your
little brain. As for the one you pose, that's been asked and answered.
Have a great evening.

Hey Laffhole,

He asked if you were going to be there and ask tough questions.
Are you?

Bob Schwartz
[email hidden]

"Bob Schwartz" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

B. Lafferty said:

<[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Sooo... Are you going to attend, and ask the tough questions? Like,
"when will the testing protocols be opened to public scrutiny", that
sort of thing? Just curious. --D-y

Quoted message said:

I think you should attend and ask the questions that are burning in your
little brain. As for the one you pose, that's been asked and answered.
Have a great evening.

Hey Laffhole,

He asked if you were going to be there and ask tough questions.
Are you?

Bob Schwartz
[email hidden]

You'll just have to go to URI to find out. :-)

matabala said:

<[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

B. Lafferty said:

<[email hidden]>wrote:

Quoted message said:

> Sooo... Are you going to attend, and ask the tough questions? Like,
> "when will the testing protocols be opened to public scrutiny", that
> sort of thing? Just curious. --D-y

B.L. replied:

Quoted message said:

I think you should attend and ask the questions that are burning in your
little brain. As for the one you pose, that's been asked and answered.
Have a great evening.

Gee I missed that answer. Could it have been "never" by any chance?

"How many experts were you prepared to hire to find Tyler guilty?"
might be another.

Here's one you might ask yourself, "How many experts was Hamilton prepared
to hire to concoct some cockamamie defense?"

Screw innocent until proven guilty in a reliable manner! Bring on the
Patriot act and McCarthyism! We don't need no stinkin' proof 'cause we
said so!
Bill C

please ask him why he calls himself [censored] POUND, when he could
use Richard.

In article <[email hidden]>,

Quoted message said:

please ask him why he calls himself [censored] POUND, when he could
use Richard.

A few years ago, I worked for a guy named Roland Wacker. Now, that doesn't
sound so bad, does it? Unfortunately, he didn't go by 'Roland'; he preferred to
be called 'Peter'.

--
tanx,
Howard

Butter is love.

remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

matabala said:

<[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

B. Lafferty said:

<[email hidden]>wrote:

Quoted message said:

> Sooo... Are you going to attend, and ask the tough questions? Like,
> "when will the testing protocols be opened to public scrutiny", that
> sort of thing? Just curious. --D-y

B.L. replied:

Quoted message said:

I think you should attend and ask the questions that are burning in your
little brain. As for the one you pose, that's been asked and answered.
Have a great evening.

Gee I missed that answer. Could it have been "never" by any chance?

"How many experts were you prepared to hire to find Tyler guilty?"
might be another.

Here's one you might ask yourself, "How many experts was Hamilton prepared
to hire to concoct some cockamamie defense?"

The issue is "innocent until proven guilty". The game is "who can hire
the most/best expert testimony".

Open protocols would seem to leave less room for attacks (vendettas)
based on personal dislikes or suspicion, is the point. --D-y

"Howard Kveck" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

Quoted message said:

please ask him why he calls himself [censored] POUND, when he could
use Richard.

A few years ago, I worked for a guy named Roland Wacker. Now, that
doesn't
sound so bad, does it? Unfortunately, he didn't go by 'Roland'; he
preferred to
be called 'Peter'.

Dead serious -- I knew a woman named Gay Barr.

JF

--
http://spaces.msn.com/members/flomblog/

B. Lafferty said:

"Bob Schwartz" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

B. Lafferty wrote:

([email hidden] wrote):

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> Sooo... Are you going to attend, and ask the tough questions? Like,
> "when will the testing protocols be opened to public scrutiny", that
> sort of thing? Just curious.

(BL replied):

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

I think you should attend and ask the questions that are burning in your
little brain. As for the one you pose, that's been asked and answered.
Have a great evening.

(B. Schwartz asked):

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Hey Laffhole,

He asked if you were going to be there and ask tough questions.
Are you?

(BL replied):

Quoted message said:

You'll just have to go to URI to find out. :-)

Shoe-on-the-other-foot Omerta. --D-y

B. Lafferty said:

From the New England listserve:

On 9/27 at 7PM, Richard Pound, President of the World Anti Doping Agency
will be speaking at the University of RI. The talk is free and open to the
public. It is at the Barry Marks Auditorium, room 271, Chafee Social
Science Center.

I think they should make him pee into a cup after his talk. I think
the results would be very interesting.

Oh, and it would be even more interesting if only the A sample were
kept
and the B sample "accidentally" misplaced and then
found frozen in a couple of years.

-ilan

Quoted message said:

B. Lafferty wrote:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

On 9/27 at 7PM, Richard Pound, President of the World Anti Doping Agency
will be speaking at the University of RI. The talk is free and open to the
public. It is at the Barry Marks Auditorium, room 271, Chafee Social
Science Center.

(Ilan responded):

Quoted message said:

I think they should make him pee into a cup after his talk. I think
the results would be very interesting.

Quoted message said:

Oh, and it would be even more interesting if only the A sample were
kept
and the B sample "accidentally" misplaced and then
found frozen in a couple of years.

POTM.

Don't forget the "pants down, shirt up" part, and the witnesses. Hey,
maybe he could demonstrate proper protocol *during* his talk. I bet
the ego is much, much bigger. Fieldglass/telescope concession at the
door? --D-y