Road Cycling · Public discussion

Postal Service Set to Pull the Plug

Started by Sierraman · · Last activity · 30 posts · 1,934 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
23 March 2004
Last activity
29 March 2004
Original author
Sierraman
Posts
30
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,934
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 30
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Somebody passed this along to me.

    Postal Service Set to Pull the Plug on $50 Million Pro-
    Cycling Team Boondoggle

    WASHINGTON, March 22 /PRNewswire/ -- In a major victory for
    consumers, Advertising Age has reported the Postal Service
    (USPS) is "poised to abandon its lead sponsorship of Lance
    Armstrong and the U.S. Pro Cycling Team" when their contract
    expires in December. The Postal Service began the estimated
    $10 million-a-year marketing initiative in 1996 and
    Armstrong has since led the international cycling team to
    five consecutive Tour de France victories.

    According to a February 2003 USPS Inspector General (OIG)
    report, the objective of the sponsorship was to "increase
    revenue and sales of Postal Service's products on a global
    basis and to increase sales in key international markets"
    with a specific monetary goal of increasing [annual
    international] revenue by $20 million. However, despite the
    cycling team's outstanding performance and extremely high
    profile, revenues from USPS international operations in
    2003 were actually $12.8 million less than four- years
    earlier in 1999.

    "Talk about a government boondoggle, the pro-cycling
    sponsorship exemplifies just how delusional postal
    leadership can be. They raised domestic monopoly rates three
    times while forcing captive ratepayers to pay more than $50
    million to sponsor a European sporting event and then,
    adding insult to injury, they achieved a negative result,"
    said PostalWatch executive director Rick Merritt.

    "This is just one more stunning example of the Postal
    Service indulging its misguided obsession with pretending
    to be a commercial enterprise, instead of what it really
    is; an accountability-challenged governmental bureaucracy
    with a statutory monopoly over domestic mail delivery,"
    said Merritt.

    The OIG report also criticized the Postal Service for its
    accounting procedures, lack of justification and
    mismanagement of sponsorships stating, "The Postal Service
    has not effectively managed sponsorships. We found the

    Postal Service was unable to verify sponsorships' financial
    performance ... the Postal Service does not have adequate
    controls and measures over the sponsorships. Therefore, it
    was not possible to measure the effectiveness of the program
    in its current state, and in our view, it is questionable
    whether the Postal Service could support a business case to
    retain the sponsorships."

    Controversy over Postal Service sponsorships and its
    inability to perform basic cost-accounting functions is
    nothing new. More than a decade ago the Government
    Accounting Office studied the agency's $98 million
    sponsorship of the 1992 Olympic Games and concluded, "Given
    the lack of available data in key revenue and cost areas,
    neither we nor the Service can state with certainty whether
    the Olympic sponsorship had a profit or loss."

    "Congress will soon consider legislation giving the Postal
    Service added flexibility to set prices, negotiate special
    pricing for specific mailers and offer additional work-
    sharing discounts. In order for these new flexibilities to
    be fairly administered, the Postal Service must be able to
    accurately attribute its various costs to specific functions
    within its operations at a highly granular level ... a cost-
    accounting task for which the agency is undeniably inept, as
    again demonstrated by the mismanagement of its sporting
    sponsorships. Granting additional flexibility without first
    fixing the agency's cost-accounting problems will only
    produce a more fertile environment for abuse, market
    distortions and unfair practices," said Merritt.

    "Congress has a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to fix the
    problem and compel postal accountability. It is currently
    holding $78 billion of reduced federal retirement
    contributions in escrow for the Postal Service. Congress
    should consider holding the bulk of that money until a
    qualified team of independent auditors can perform a top-to-
    bottom operational audit and put in place comprehensive
    accounting procedures to ensure the agency can accurately
    account and attribute is costs ... Accountability is the
    first order of business."

    PostalWatch is a non-partisan, non-profit advocacy
    organization committed to a fair, efficient and accountable
    U.S. Postal Service. PostalWatch maintains a website at
    www.postalwatch.org.

  2. Sierraman said:

    Somebody passed this along to me.

    Postal Service Set to Pull the Plug on $50 Million Pro-
    Cycling Team Boondoggle

    WASHINGTON, March 22 /PRNewswire/ -- In a major victory
    for consumers, Advertising Age has reported the Postal
    Service (USPS) is "poised to abandon its lead sponsorship
    of Lance Armstrong and the U.S. Pro Cycling Team" when
    their contract expires in December. The Postal Service
    began the estimated $10 million-a-year marketing
    initiative in 1996 and Armstrong has since led the
    international cycling team to five consecutive Tour de
    France victories.

    [censored], [censored]......

    Quoted message said:


    PostalWatch is a non-partisan, non-profit advocacy
    organization committed to a fair, efficient and
    accountable U.S. Postal Service. PostalWatch maintains a
    website at www.postalwatch.org.


    Non-partisan?!?!?!?!?! BS!!!

    They need to get [censored]-slapped and stick something in their
    mouths to keep them happy......

  3. Steve said:

    On 3/22/04 7:13 PM, in article n9ednSCE1c3EN8LdRVn-

    Quoted post said:

    Somebody passed this along to me.

    Postal Service Set to Pull the Plug on $50 Million Pro-
    Cycling Team Boondoggle

    WASHINGTON, March 22 /PRNewswire/ -- In a major victory
    for consumers,

    A major victory for consumers would be if they started
    charging a fair value for mail-spam.

    Dan

  4. The end of their sponsership was bound to happen, all the
    big names do it some day. I still miss the Renult and Fiat
    sponsered Teams myself.

    My dream is for UPS or FedEx to pick up the spot by USPS and
    make a UPS Berry Floor team. That would so kick ass, the
    team trucks would be just special UPS trucks and they could
    make marketing gold out of the UPS takes over from the USPS.

    "Dan Connelly" <d_j_c_o_n_n_e_l@i_e_e_e.o_r_g> wrote in
    message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Steve said:

    On 3/22/04 7:13 PM, in article n9ednSCE1c3EN8LdRVn-
    [email hidden],


    "Sierraman"

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Somebody passed this along to me.

    Postal Service Set to Pull the Plug on $50 Million Pro-
    Cycling Team Boondoggle

    WASHINGTON, March 22 /PRNewswire/ -- In a major victory
    for consumers,

    A major victory for consumers would be if they started
    charging a fair


    value

    Quoted message said:

    for mail-spam.

    Dan

  5. "Raymo853" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    The end of their sponsership was bound to happen, all the
    big names do it some day. I still miss the Renult and Fiat
    sponsered Teams myself.

    My dream is for UPS or FedEx to pick up the spot by USPS
    and make a UPS Berry Floor team. That would so kick ass,
    the team trucks would be just special UPS trucks and they
    could make marketing gold out of the UPS takes over from
    the USPS.

    The key to such sponsorships is building brand awareness and
    increasing market share. This is what Motorola did with
    their Euro cycling involvement and they got out when the
    result had been achieved. Do FedEx and UPS need to build
    brand awarenes in Europe? I don't have any idea. I doubt
    that such a cycling team would fit into a US based marketing
    strategy--at least not at the dollar amount that USPS was
    committed to. More likely that another European centered
    company will step in, although the focus of the team may
    well shift to classics and other, possibly shorter, stage
    races, particularly if Armstrong either retires or has a bad
    2004 TdF and rides in 2005 with far different goals.

  6. Sierraman said:

    Somebody passed this along to me.

    Postal Service Set to Pull the Plug on $50 Million Pro-
    Cycling Team Boondoggle

    WASHINGTON, March 22 /PRNewswire/ -- In a major victory
    for consumers, Advertising Age has reported the Postal
    Service (USPS) is "poised to abandon its lead sponsorship
    of Lance Armstrong and the U.S. Pro Cycling Team" when
    their contract expires in December. The Postal Service
    began the estimated $10 million-a-year marketing
    initiative in 1996 and Armstrong has since led the
    international cycling team to five consecutive Tour de
    France victories.


    I suppose this means that Lance will have to ride the Giro
    this year, instead of some other "before I retire" time.

  7. Quoted post said:

    Originally posted by B. Lafferty
    The key to such sponsorships is building brand awareness and
    increasing market share. This is what Motorola did with
    their Euro cycling involvement and they got out when the
    result had been achieved. Do FedEx and UPS need to build
    brand awarenes in Europe? I don't have any idea. I doubt
    that such a cycling team would fit into a US based marketing
    strategy--at least not at the dollar amount that USPS was
    committed to. More likely that another European centered
    company will step in, although the focus of the team may
    well shift to classics and other, possibly shorter, stage
    races, particularly if Armstrong either retires or has a bad
    2004 TdF and rides in 2005 with far different goals.

    So why not AMD? They've got tons of money, and are targeting the international market via F1, and they are already "hooked".

  8. "Kyle Legate" wrote ...

    Quoted message said:


    I suppose this means that Lance will have to ride the
    Giro this year, instead of some other "before I
    retire" time.

    Why's that?

  9. Raymo853 said:

    My dream is for UPS or FedEx to pick up the spot by USPS
    and make a UPS Berry Floor team. That would so kick ass,
    the team trucks would be just special UPS trucks and they
    could make marketing gold out of the UPS takes over from
    the USPS.

    I can't wait to see LANCE in a [censored] brown uniform.

  10. Raymo853 said:

    My dream is for UPS or FedEx to pick up the spot by USPS
    and make a UPS Berry Floor team. That would so kick ass,
    the team trucks would be just special UPS trucks and they
    could make marketing gold out of the UPS takes over from
    the USPS.

    I can't wait to see LANCE in a [censored] brown uniform.

  11. In article <[email hidden]>,

    (gwhite) said:
    Raymo853 said:

    My dream is for UPS or FedEx to pick up the spot by USPS
    and make a UPS Berry Floor team. That would so kick ass,
    the team trucks would be just special UPS trucks and
    they could make marketing gold out of the UPS takes over
    from the USPS.

    I can't wait to see LANCE in a [censored] brown uniform.

    Well, it'll stand out in the peloton, won't it?

    --
    tanx, Howard

    Q: Why did the metalhead cross the road?
    R: Because he's a gullible moron who'll buy
    anything with a skull on it.

    remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

  12. "Jim Flom" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<AC18c.1464$wg1.1229@edtnps84>...

    Quoted message said:

    "Kyle Legate" wrote ...

    Quoted message said:


    I suppose this means that Lance will have to ride the
    Giro this year, instead of some other "before I
    retire" time.

    Why's that?

    Because he's been quoted saying things like, "I'd never ride
    for any other team". I think he really didn't mean to say
    that. What he meant to say was, "I'll never ride for anyone
    but Brunyeel".

  13. Howard Kveck <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    In article
    <[email hidden]>,

    (gwhite) said:
    Quoted message said:


    I can't wait to see LANCE in a [censored] brown uniform.

    Well, it'll stand out in the peloton, won't it?

    It's been done and looks bad. And doesn't stand out
    that much.

    jt10000.combhof0034.htm

    JT

  14. [email hidden] (jim gravity) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    "Jim Flom" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<AC18c.1464$wg1.1229@edtnps84>...

    Quoted message said:

    "Kyle Legate" wrote ...

    Quoted message said:


    I suppose this means that Lance will have to ride the
    Giro this year, instead of some other "before I
    retire" time.

    Why's that?

    Because he's been quoted saying things like, "I'd never
    ride for any other team". I think he really didn't mean to
    say that. What he meant to say was, "I'll never ride for
    anyone but Brunyeel".

    Riding for a different team and riding for a different
    sponsor are two totaly different things...One involves
    jersey change the other involves changing your life.

  15. Quoted post said:

    Originally posted by Steven
    Riding for a different team and riding for a different
    sponsor are two totaly different things...One involves
    jersey change the other involves changing your life.

    Yes, and riding for Brunyeel (and co.) would be a jersey change.

  16. Steven said:

    Riding for a different team and riding for a different
    sponsor are two totaly different things...One involves
    jersey change the other involves changing your life.

    Anyone heard the rumor he's joining Webcor for '05?

    Dan

  17. Quoted message said:

    Subject: Postal Service Set to Pull the Plug
    From: "Sierraman" [email hidden]
    Date: 3/22/2004 10:13 PM Eastern Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    Somebody passed this along to me.

    Postal Service Set to Pull the Plug on $50 Million Pro-
    Cycling Team Boondoggle

    WASHINGTON, March 22 /PRNewswire/ -- In a major victory for
    consumers, Advertising Age has reported the Postal Service
    (USPS) is "poised to abandon its lead sponsorship of Lance
    Armstrong and the U.S. Pro Cycling Team" when their
    contract expires in December. The Postal Service began the
    estimated $10 million-a-year marketing initiative in 1996
    and Armstrong has since led the international cycling team
    to five consecutive Tour de France victories.

    According to a February 2003 USPS Inspector General (OIG)
    report, the objective of the sponsorship was to "increase
    revenue and sales of Postal Service's products on a global
    basis and to increase sales in key international markets"
    with a specific monetary goal of increasing [annual
    international] revenue by $20 million. However, despite the
    cycling team's outstanding performance and extremely high
    profile, revenues from USPS international operations in
    2003 were actually $12.8 million less than four- years
    earlier in 1999.

    "Talk about a government boondoggle, the pro-cycling
    sponsorship exemplifies just how delusional postal
    leadership can be. They raised domestic monopoly rates
    three times while forcing captive ratepayers to pay more
    than $50 million to sponsor a European sporting event and
    then, adding insult to injury, they achieved a negative
    result," said PostalWatch executive director Rick Merritt.

    "This is just one more stunning example of the Postal
    Service indulging its misguided obsession with pretending
    to be a commercial enterprise, instead of what it really
    is; an accountability-challenged governmental bureaucracy
    with a statutory monopoly over domestic mail delivery,"
    said Merritt.

    The OIG report also criticized the Postal Service for its
    accounting procedures, lack of justification and
    mismanagement of sponsorships stating, "The Postal Service
    has not effectively managed sponsorships. We found the

    Postal Service was unable to verify sponsorships' financial
    performance ... the Postal Service does not have adequate
    controls and measures over the sponsorships. Therefore, it
    was not possible to measure the effectiveness of the
    program in its current state, and in our view, it is
    questionable whether the Postal Service could support a
    business case to retain the sponsorships."

    Controversy over Postal Service sponsorships and its
    inability to perform basic cost-accounting functions is
    nothing new. More than a decade ago the Government
    Accounting Office studied the agency's $98 million
    sponsorship of the 1992 Olympic Games and concluded, "Given
    the lack of available data in key revenue and cost areas,
    neither we nor the Service can state with certainty whether
    the Olympic sponsorship had a profit or loss."

    "Congress will soon consider legislation giving the Postal
    Service added flexibility to set prices, negotiate special
    pricing for specific mailers and offer additional work-
    sharing discounts. In order for these new flexibilities to
    be fairly administered, the Postal Service must be able to
    accurately attribute its various costs to specific
    functions within its operations at a highly granular level
    ... a cost-accounting task for which the agency is
    undeniably inept, as again demonstrated by the
    mismanagement of its sporting sponsorships. Granting
    additional flexibility without first fixing the agency's
    cost-accounting problems will only produce a more fertile
    environment for abuse, market distortions and unfair
    practices," said Merritt.

    "Congress has a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to fix the
    problem and compel postal accountability. It is currently
    holding $78 billion of reduced federal retirement
    contributions in escrow for the Postal Service. Congress
    should consider holding the bulk of that money until a
    qualified team of independent auditors can perform a top-to-
    bottom operational audit and put in place comprehensive
    accounting procedures to ensure the agency can accurately
    account and attribute is costs ... Accountability is the
    first order of business."

    PostalWatch is a non-partisan, non-profit advocacy
    organization committed to a fair, efficient and accountable
    U.S. Postal Service. PostalWatch maintains a website at
    www.postalwatch.org.

    ha ha...Yeah, let's insist the U.S. Postal Service is
    turned over to private industry. That way, we can look
    forward to a 100% increase in the price of postage to
    support hierarchy of multi-millionaire CEO's/CFO's who will
    get yearly bonuses and pay raises regardless of
    performance.

  18. UPS??

    Can you imagine the "men-in-brown" uniforms. They would look
    like a big turds on wheels!

    "Raymo853" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    The end of their sponsership was bound to happen, all the
    big names do it some day. I still miss the Renult and Fiat
    sponsered Teams myself.

    My dream is for UPS or FedEx to pick up the spot by USPS
    and make a UPS Berry Floor team. That would so kick ass,
    the team trucks would be just special UPS trucks and they
    could make marketing gold out of the UPS takes over from
    the USPS.

    "Dan Connelly" <d_j_c_o_n_n_e_l@i_e_e_e.o_r_g> wrote in
    message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Steve said:

    On 3/22/04 7:13 PM, in article n9ednSCE1c3EN8LdRVn-
    [email hidden],


    "Sierraman"

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    <[email hidden]> wrote:

    >Somebody passed this along to me.
    >
    >Postal Service Set to Pull the Plug on $50 Million Pro-
    >Cycling Team Boondoggle
    >
    >WASHINGTON, March 22 /PRNewswire/ -- In a major
    >victory for consumers,

    A major victory for consumers would be if they started
    charging a fair


    value

    Quoted message said:

    for mail-spam.

    Dan


  19. Doug said:

    UPS??

    Can you imagine the "men-in-brown" uniforms. They would
    look like a big turds on wheels!

    UPS has already sponsored team(s): cyclingnews.c-cyclingnews.c-
    om/results/2000/apr00/apr29results.shtml

  20. In article <[email hidden]>,

    (John Forrest Tomlinson) said:

    Howard Kveck <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<YOURhoward-
    [email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    In article
    <[email hidden]>,

    (gwhite) said:

    >
    I can't wait to see LANCE in a [censored] brown uniform.

    Well, it'll stand out in the peloton, won't it?

    It's been done and looks bad. And doesn't stand out
    that much.

    jt10000.combhof0034.htm

    JT

    That looks like it has a lot of red in it (you're right
    about it looking bad), I was thinking (and I'd bet Greg
    was too) of an all brown uniform. It's worth noting that
    in Nascar, while the UPS car is driven by a guy whose
    firesuit is mostly brown, the car itself is not all
    brown. <racing.ups.comi
    mages/gallery_images/200403
    21/20040321_03.jpg>

    --
    tanx, Howard

    Q: Why did the metalhead cross the road?
    R: Because he's a gullible moron who'll buy
    anything with a skull on it.

    remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.