UK and Europe · Public discussion

Police fining cyclists for what?

Started by KevinS · · Last activity · 31 posts · 837 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
6 February 2007
Last activity
13 February 2007
Original author
KevinS
Posts
31
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
837
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 31
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hi all,

    Walking to work this morning, along Aldersgat St near the Barbican in
    London, I was amazed to see a policeman on a push bike apparently
    fining a cyclist (the cyclist was handing over his credit card so I
    assume he was being fined).

    Is this happening alot? If so what for?

    Cheers

  2. KevinS said the following on 06/02/2007 09:35:

    Quoted message said:

    Walking to work this morning, along Aldersgat St near the Barbican in
    London, I was amazed to see a policeman on a push bike apparently
    fining a cyclist (the cyclist was handing over his credit card so I
    assume he was being fined).

    There is no way on this earth I would hand over a credit card to anyone
    in those circumstances, even if they were dressed as a copper!

    --
    Paul Boyd
    http://www.paul-boyd.co.uk/

  3. KevinS said:

    Walking to work this morning, along Aldersgat St near the Barbican in
    London, I was amazed to see a policeman on a push bike apparently
    fining a cyclist (the cyclist was handing over his credit card so I
    assume he was being fined).

    I didn't think we had such thing as on-the-spot fines of that nature
    in this country. Perhaps he was requesting a form of identification,
    or the cyclist was handing over a lost card he had found?

    Neil

  4. KevinS said:

    Walking to work this morning, along Aldersgat St near the Barbican in
    London, I was amazed to see a policeman on a push bike apparently
    fining a cyclist (the cyclist was handing over his credit card so I
    assume he was being fined).

    Is this happening alot? If so what for?

    The City of London Police can and do issue "spot fines" (FPNs) for
    pavement cycling, RLJ, and cycling without lights,but my understanding
    is that "spot" means they're issued on the spot, not that you have to
    pay them on the spot - you get 14 days or whatever it is to come up with
    the cash.

    -dan

    --
    http://www.coruskate.net/

  5. KevinS said:

    Hi all,

    Walking to work this morning, along Aldersgat St near the Barbican in
    London, I was amazed to see a policeman on a push bike apparently
    fining a cyclist (the cyclist was handing over his credit card so I
    assume he was being fined).

    Is this happening alot? If so what for?

    happens when a person (such as a cyclist) does something considered
    wrong in the city .... doesn't happen when an institution such as a
    bank does something in the city a person would be consider wrong

  6. Daniel Barlow said:

    The City of London Police can and do issue "spot fines" (FPNs) for
    pavement cycling, RLJ, and cycling without lights,but my understanding
    is that "spot" means they're issued on the spot, not that you have to
    pay them on the spot - you get 14 days or whatever it is to come up with
    the cash.

    If he was being fined then he could have been using his card to prove
    the details he was giving were correct. Can you elect to pay a fine
    on the spot? I've heard that police march people to cash machines in
    some cases to pay fines but I don't think the police would carry chip
    & pin machines with them to take card payments!

    peter

  7. "naked_draughtsman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    If he was being fined then he could have been using his card to prove
    the details he was giving were correct. Can you elect to pay a fine
    on the spot? I've heard that police march people to cash machines in
    some cases to pay fines but I don't think the police would carry chip
    & pin machines with them to take card payments!

    They would certainly not have any powers to "march someone to a cash
    machine" !

    cheers adrian www.boliston.co.uk

  8. On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 13:51:10 -0000, "Adrian Boliston" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    "naked_draughtsman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    If he was being fined then he could have been using his card to prove
    the details he was giving were correct. Can you elect to pay a fine
    on the spot? I've heard that police march people to cash machines in
    some cases to pay fines but I don't think the police would carry chip
    & pin machines with them to take card payments!

    They would certainly not have any powers to "march someone to a cash
    machine" !

    That was one of tBlair's madcap schemes.

    It was ruled out the moment someone with two brain cells had looked at it.

  9. On 06/02/2007 14:26, Ewan said,

    Quoted message said:

    It was ruled out the moment someone with two brain cells had looked at it.

    Presumably not a politician then? :-)

    --
    Paul Boyd
    http://www.paul-boyd.co.uk/

  10. KevinS said:

    Hi all,

    Walking to work this morning, along Aldersgat St near the Barbican in
    London, I was amazed to see a policeman on a push bike apparently
    fining a cyclist (the cyclist was handing over his credit card so I
    assume he was being fined).

    IME cops don't carry the machines to collect the money anyway; its usually
    at some part of the Magistrates Court where you have to pay off fines if you
    are unlucky enough to get one.

    Probably just a routine stopcheck..

    It is not uncommon for cops to ask for some form of identification and as
    most UK citizens don't carry ID cards, they will often inspect other cards
    in your wallet - on the presumption that comparatively few people are daft
    or brazen enough to produce a blatantly fake or stolen bank card...

    Alex

    --
    Mr R@T / General Lighting
    Ipswich, Suffolk, Untied Kingdom
    http://www.partyvibe.com

  11. Mr R@t (2.30zi) said:


    Probably just a routine stopcheck..

    Can they just do that? I thought that they needed an excuse^W^Wa reason.

    --
    Don Whybrow

    Sequi Bonum Non Time

    "No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the
    legislature is in session." (Judge Gideon J. Tucker, 1866.)

  12. In article <[email hidden]>, Don Whybrow
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:
    Mr R@t (2.30zi) said:


    Probably just a routine stopcheck..

    Can they just do that? I thought that they needed an excuse^W^Wa reason.


    It's often not hard to find a reason.

  13. In news:[email hidden],
    Rob Morley <[email hidden]> tweaked the Babbage-Engine to tell us:

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>, Don Whybrow
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:
    Mr R@t (2.30zi) said:


    Probably just a routine stopcheck..

    Can they just do that? I thought that they needed an excuse^W^Wa
    reason.


    It's often not hard to find a reason.

    Loitering with intent to use a pedestrian crossing
    Wearing a loud-coloured shirt in a built-up area
    Having an offensive wife
    Etc.
    </NTNOCN>

    --
    Dave Larrington
    <http://www.legslarry.beerdrinkers.co.uk>
    They came for Dani Behr; I said: "she's over there, behind the
    wardrobe".

  14. Dave Larrington said:

    In news:[email hidden],
    Rob Morley <[email hidden]> tweaked the Babbage-Engine to tell us:

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>, Don Whybrow
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    Mr R@t (2.30zi) wrote:
    >
    > Probably just a routine stopcheck..
    >

    Can they just do that? I thought that they needed an excuse^W^Wa
    reason.


    It's often not hard to find a reason.

    Loitering with intent to use a pedestrian crossing
    Wearing a loud-coloured shirt in a built-up area
    Having an offensive wife
    Etc.
    </NTNOCN>

    Maybe the police officer was actually a themed prostitute and was charging
    for services rendered.
    --
    Three wheels good, two wheels ok

    www.catrike.co.uk

  15. In article <[email hidden]>, Dave Larrington
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    In news:[email hidden],
    Rob Morley <[email hidden]> tweaked the Babbage-Engine to tell us:

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>, Don Whybrow
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    Mr R@t (2.30zi) wrote:
    >
    > Probably just a routine stopcheck..
    >

    Can they just do that? I thought that they needed an excuse^W^Wa
    reason.


    It's often not hard to find a reason.

    Loitering with intent to use a pedestrian crossing
    Wearing a loud-coloured shirt in a built-up area
    Having an offensive wife
    Etc.
    </NTNOCN>


    I thought of that too. :-)

  16. Don Whybrow said:
    Mr R@t (2.30zi) said:

    Probably just a routine stopcheck..

    Can they just do that? I thought that they needed an excuse^W^Wa reason.

    --
    Don Whybrow

    Sequi Bonum Non Time

    "No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the
    legislature is in session." (Judge Gideon J. Tucker, 1866.)

    Stop checks are usually conducted on those people who are known to
    police or who are acting in a suspicious manner.Stop checks often
    lead
    to the arrest of a wanted person. At the end of the day the police
    have a job to do and yes sometimes it does inconvenience completely
    innocent people. There many occasions were the public put their 'oar
    in' because they perceive that the police are not acting in a
    professional manner or not acting lawfully. Most of these people
    don't
    have a clue because they simpy don't know all of the circumstances
    surrounding a particular incident or know of the powers in which the
    police operate. There are a 101 reasons why this cyclist was speaking
    with the police officer and no one but the cyclist, the police
    officer, God and whoever they choose to speak to about it
    will know.

    Richie

  17. Richie said the following on 08/02/2007 21:52:

    Quoted message said:

    Stop checks are usually conducted on those people who are known to
    police or who are acting in a suspicious manner.Stop checks often
    lead

    What did the SAS laws from the 1970s immediately spring to mind just then?

    Actually, I've just seen that the law still exists, although I suppose
    you can't be stopped on suspicion of walking with intent to get to your
    destination any more.

    --
    Paul Boyd
    http://www.paul-boyd.co.uk/

  18. Paul Boyd usenet.dont.work@plusnet said:

    Richie said the following on 08/02/2007 21:52:

    Quoted message said:

    Stop checks are usually conducted on those people who are known to
    police or who are acting in a suspicious manner.Stop checks often
    lead

    What did the SAS laws from the 1970s immediately spring to mind just then?

    Actually, I've just seen that the law still exists, although I suppose
    you can't be stopped on suspicion of walking with intent to get to your
    destination any more.

    --
    Paul Boydhttp://www.paul-boyd.co.uk/

    There are no real grounds required for a stop check; i.e name, DOB,
    address. Police may ask for your details and run them through the
    police national computer etc, but unless it's been brought to your
    attention that you've committed an offence you are not obliged to
    provide any information. In other words you can tell the officer to
    'get on his bike', as he has no power in law to detain you. But to be
    fair the police don't usually ask for someones details unless they
    have good reason to.
    A stop search is different. Reasonable grounds are required. A stop
    search is used to allay or confirm whether or not an offence has been
    committed. For example a person in the street explains to a police
    officer that a man sat on a bench across the road has been seen waving
    a lock knife around. The man would be searched by the police officer.
    If the knife was found it is likely that he would be arrested. If a
    knife was not found he would be free to go. The process is designed to
    reduce the number of innocent people spending time in police custody
    for no apparent reason.

    Richie

  19. Richie said:
    Paul Boyd usenet.dont.work@plusnet said:

    Richie said the following on 08/02/2007 21:52:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Stop checks are usually conducted on those people who are known to
    police or who are acting in a suspicious manner.Stop checks often
    lead

    Quoted message said:

    What did the SAS laws from the 1970s immediately spring to mind just then?

    Quoted message said:

    Actually, I've just seen that the law still exists, although I suppose
    you can't be stopped on suspicion of walking with intent to get to your
    destination any more.

    Quoted message said:

    --
    Paul Boydhttp://www.paul-boyd.co.uk/

    There are no real grounds required for a stop check; i.e name, DOB,
    address. Police may ask for your details and run them through the
    police national computer etc, but unless it's been brought to your
    attention that you've committed an offence you are not obliged to
    provide any information. In other words you can tell the officer to
    'get on his bike', as he has no power in law to detain you. But to be
    fair the police don't usually ask for someones details unless they
    have good reason to.
    A stop search is different. Reasonable grounds are required. A stop
    search is used to allay or confirm whether or not an offence has been
    committed. For example a person in the street explains to a police
    officer that a man sat on a bench across the road has been seen waving
    a lock knife around. The man would be searched by the police officer.
    If the knife was found it is likely that he would be arrested. If a
    knife was not found he would be free to go. The process is designed to
    reduce the number of innocent people spending time in police custody
    for no apparent reason.

    Richie

    I was stopped and searched once, walking home at 1am from a job bar-
    tenders job. I was dressed in a white shirt and black trousers, in the
    summer time, and had a small rucksack with me for my shoes. A Police
    car pulled up along side of me as I was looking in a shop window and
    asked what was I doing out so late, in the Town Centre. I explained.
    They got out of there vehicle and requested to search my bag, and a
    pat down of myself. I agreed. They said it was because they'd been
    some crime in the area.

  20. Quoted message said:
    Richie said:
    Paul Boyd usenet.dont.work@plusnet said:

    Richie said the following on 08/02/2007 21:52:

    Quoted message said:

    > Stop checks are usually conducted on those people who are known to
    > police or who are acting in a suspicious manner.Stop checks often
    > lead

    Quoted message said:

    What did the SAS laws from the 1970s immediately spring to mind just then?

    Quoted message said:

    Actually, I've just seen that the law still exists, although I suppose
    you can't be stopped on suspicion of walking with intent to get to your
    destination any more.

    A stop search is different. Reasonable grounds are required.

    I was stopped and searched once, walking home at 1am from a job bar-
    tenders job. I was dressed in a white shirt and black trousers, in the
    summer time, and had a small rucksack with me for my shoes. A Police
    car pulled up along side of me as I was looking in a shop window and
    asked what was I doing out so late, in the Town Centre. I explained.
    They got out of there vehicle and requested to search my bag, and a
    pat down of myself. I agreed. They said it was because they'd been
    some crime in the area.

    It doesn't matter because you agreed but I don't think that that is
    a sufficient reason, especially after you had been cooperative and
    mentioned why you were walking through town late at night, unless the
    crime had been people breaking shop-windows late at night. They should
    tell you what exactly they are looking for and why they chose you in
    particular as well as their name and station.

    --
    Andy Leighton => [email hidden]
    "The Lord is my shepherd, but we still lost the sheep dog trials"
    - Robert Rankin, _They Came And Ate Us_

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.