Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Polarized sun glasses

Started by Joao de Souza · · Last activity · 37 posts · 1,301 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
12 May 2008
Last activity
18 May 2008
Original author
Joao de Souza
Posts
37
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,301
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 37
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Okay I'm officially confused. I always read about how great polarized
    glasses are for riding and driving. And back in my driving days, I had
    a set of polarized ray-bans that would stay in the car.

    Now I decided to upgrade my Rudy Project cycling sunglasses. I bit the
    bullet, and paid far too much money for a pair of their polarized
    lenses. The lenses just arrived, and they have a "not suitable for
    driving or road use" warning sticker on them. Anyone have any idea why?

    I wrote to them asking this same question, but while I wait for their
    official response, I wanted to see if anyone else had this problem.

  2. Joao de Souza said:

    Okay I'm officially confused. I always read about how great
    polarized glasses are for riding and driving. And back in my
    driving days, I had a set of polarized ray-bans that would stay in
    the car.

    Quoted message said:

    Now I decided to upgrade my Rudy Project cycling sunglasses. I bit
    the bullet, and paid far too much money for a pair of their
    polarized lenses. The lenses just arrived, and they have a "not
    suitable for driving or road use" warning sticker on them. Anyone
    have any idea why?

    Quoted message said:

    I wrote to them asking this same question, but while I wait for
    their official response, I wanted to see if anyone else had this
    problem.

    I discovered the reason the one time I used Polaroid glasses many
    years ago when I was given a pair. My first descent was on a forested
    mountain pass after heavy rain. I discovered that I could not use the
    glasses because, depending on the direction to the sun in the cleared
    sky, I could not discern between wet and dry road, the gloss of a wet
    road when facing the sun being polarized and blocked by the lenses
    while riding away from the sun the road looked different wet.
    Distinguishing wet and dry asphalt was not reasonable.

    Don't try it, you'll crash.

    Jobst Brandt

  3. Joao de Souza said:

    Okay I'm officially confused. I always read about how great
    polarized glasses are for riding and driving. And back in my
    driving days, I had a set of polarized ray-bans that would stay in
    the car.

    Quoted message said:

    Now I decided to upgrade my Rudy Project cycling sunglasses. I bit
    the bullet, and paid far too much money for a pair of their
    polarized lenses. The lenses just arrived, and they have a "not
    suitable for driving or road use" warning sticker on them. Anyone
    have any idea why?

    Quoted message said:

    I wrote to them asking this same question, but while I wait for
    their official response, I wanted to see if anyone else had this
    problem.

    I discovered the reason the one time I used Polaroid glasses many
    years ago when I was given a pair. My first descent was on a forested
    mountain pass after heavy rain. I discovered that I could not use the
    glasses because, depending on the direction to the sun in the cleared
    sky, I could not discern between wet and dry road, the gloss of a wet
    road.

    When facing the sun wet road glare is polarized and blocked by the
    lenses while riding away from the sun the road looked wet.
    Distinguishing wet and dry asphalt was not reasonable, especially with
    shadows from the forest being intermittent and sharply delineated on a
    road traversing the mountain in opposite directions after each hairpin
    turn.

    Don't try it, you'll crash.
    --
    Jobst Brandt

  4. Joao de Souza said:

    Okay I'm officially confused. I always read about how great polarized
    glasses are for riding and driving. And back in my driving days, I had
    a set of polarized ray-bans that would stay in the car.

    Now I decided to upgrade my Rudy Project cycling sunglasses. I bit the
    bullet, and paid far too much money for a pair of their polarized
    lenses. The lenses just arrived, and they have a "not suitable for
    driving or road use" warning sticker on them. Anyone have any idea why?

    I wrote to them asking this same question, but while I wait for their
    official response, I wanted to see if anyone else had this problem.

    Polarized lenses help over water, fishing etc.
    --
    Andrew Muzi
    <www.yellowjersey.org/>
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971
    ** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

  5. A Muzi said:
    Joao de Souza said:

    Okay I'm officially confused. I always read about how great polarized
    glasses are for riding and driving. And back in my driving days, I
    had a set of polarized ray-bans that would stay in the car.

    Now I decided to upgrade my Rudy Project cycling sunglasses. I bit
    the bullet, and paid far too much money for a pair of their polarized
    lenses. The lenses just arrived, and they have a "not suitable for
    driving or road use" warning sticker on them. Anyone have any idea why?

    I wrote to them asking this same question, but while I wait for their
    official response, I wanted to see if anyone else had this problem.

    Polarized lenses help over water, fishing etc.

    I'm sold on them for driving, haven't tried them riding yet. I have a
    set of green-tinted polarized prescription Ray-Bans and I love them to
    pieces. The one drawback I've found is that they produce very strange
    interference patterns when looking out through car windows with
    aftermarket tint film, but none of my personal vehicles are so equipped
    so this is a non-issue for me.

    nate

    --
    replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply.
    http://members.cox.net/njnagel

  6. Andrew Muzi said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Okay I'm officially confused. I always read about how great
    polarized glasses are for riding and driving. And back in my
    driving days, I had a set of polarized ray-bans that would stay in
    the car.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Now I decided to upgrade my Rudy Project cycling sunglasses. I bit
    the bullet, and paid far too much money for a pair of their
    polarized lenses. The lenses just arrived, and they have a "not
    suitable for driving or road use" warning sticker on them. Anyone
    have any idea why?

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I wrote to them asking this same question, but while I wait for
    their official response, I wanted to see if anyone else had this
    problem.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I discovered the reason the one time I used Polaroid glasses many
    years ago when I was given a pair. My first descent was on a forested
    mountain pass after heavy rain. I discovered that I could not use the
    glasses because, depending on the direction to the sun in the cleared
    sky, I could not discern between wet and dry road, the gloss of a wet
    road.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    When facing the sun wet road glare is polarized and blocked by the
    lenses while riding away from the sun the road looked wet.
    Distinguishing wet and dry asphalt was not reasonable, especially with
    shadows from the forest being intermittent and sharply delineated on a
    road traversing the mountain in opposite directions after each hairpin
    turn.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Don't try it, you'll crash.

    Quoted message said:

    Polarized lenses help over water, fishing etc.

    You might better say that they reduce glare and therein lie their feet
    of clay, when glare is an important clue about surface contamination
    (water). You're not going to skid on a fish pond. The question was
    whether they were good for driving.
    --
    Jobst Brandt

  7. Nate Nagel said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Okay I'm officially confused. I always read about how great
    polarized glasses are for riding and driving. And back in my
    driving days, I had a set of polarized ray-bans that would stay in
    the car.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Now I decided to upgrade my Rudy Project cycling sunglasses. I
    bit the bullet, and paid far too much money for a pair of their
    polarized lenses. The lenses just arrived, and they have a "not
    suitable for driving or road use" warning sticker on them. Anyone
    have any idea why?

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I wrote to them asking this same question, but while I wait for
    their official response, I wanted to see if anyone else had this
    problem.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Polarized lenses help over water, fishing etc.

    Quoted message said:

    I'm sold on them for driving, haven't tried them riding yet. I have
    a set of green-tinted polarized prescription Ray-Bans and I love
    them to pieces. The one drawback I've found is that they produce
    very strange interference patterns when looking out through car
    windows with aftermarket tint film, but none of my personal vehicles
    are so equipped so this is a non-issue for me.

    Try looking at old VW or other tempered glass windshields. The stress
    in such glass causes all angles of polarization and these interfere
    with sight with Polaroid glasses. Also, the stress patterns are
    strikingly visible with such glasses.
    --
    Jobst Brandt

  8. Quoted message said:
    Nate Nagel said:
    Quoted message said:

    >Okay I'm officially confused. I always read about how great
    >polarized glasses are for riding and driving. And back in my
    >driving days, I had a set of polarized ray-bans that would stay in
    >the car.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >Now I decided to upgrade my Rudy Project cycling sunglasses. I
    >bit the bullet, and paid far too much money for a pair of their
    >polarized lenses. The lenses just arrived, and they have a "not
    >suitable for driving or road use" warning sticker on them. Anyone
    >have any idea why?

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >I wrote to them asking this same question, but while I wait for
    >their official response, I wanted to see if anyone else had this
    >problem.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Polarized lenses help over water, fishing etc.

    Quoted message said:

    I'm sold on them for driving, haven't tried them riding yet. I have
    a set of green-tinted polarized prescription Ray-Bans and I love
    them to pieces. The one drawback I've found is that they produce
    very strange interference patterns when looking out through car
    windows with aftermarket tint film, but none of my personal vehicles
    are so equipped so this is a non-issue for me.

    Try looking at old VW or other tempered glass windshields. The stress
    in such glass causes all angles of polarization and these interfere
    with sight with Polaroid glasses. Also, the stress patterns are
    strikingly visible with such glasses.

    I don't know if tempered glass has ever been acceptable for windshields
    here in the US, at least for vehicle years likely to be found still on
    the road. My '49 Chevy had laminated glass as well as my '55
    Studebaker, and while I actually know of another '49 Chevy nearby with
    regular license plates on it no less, that's probably getting close to
    the upper limit for age of a vehicle as viable transportation. In fact,
    back when those cars were built, laminated glass was required on *all*
    windows, and it was only later that tempered glass was allowed for side
    and rear windows. AFAIK, laminated ("safety"😉 glass is still required
    on windshields.

    nate

    --
    replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply.
    http://members.cox.net/njnagel

  9. Quoted message said:
    Nate Nagel said:
    Quoted message said:

    > Okay I'm officially confused. I always read about how great
    > polarized glasses are for riding and driving. And back in my
    > driving days, I had a set of polarized ray-bans that would stay in
    > the car.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > Now I decided to upgrade my Rudy Project cycling sunglasses. I
    > bit the bullet, and paid far too much money for a pair of their
    > polarized lenses. The lenses just arrived, and they have a "not
    > suitable for driving or road use" warning sticker on them. Anyone
    > have any idea why?

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > I wrote to them asking this same question, but while I wait for
    > their official response, I wanted to see if anyone else had this
    > problem.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Polarized lenses help over water, fishing etc.

    Quoted message said:

    I'm sold on them for driving, haven't tried them riding yet. I have
    a set of green-tinted polarized prescription Ray-Bans and I love
    them to pieces. The one drawback I've found is that they produce
    very strange interference patterns when looking out through car
    windows with aftermarket tint film, but none of my personal vehicles
    are so equipped so this is a non-issue for me.

    Try looking at old VW or other tempered glass windshields. The stress
    in such glass causes all angles of polarization and these interfere
    with sight with Polaroid glasses. Also, the stress patterns are
    strikingly visible with such glasses.

    er, so how is it acceptable to use polarizing [tempered] glass for
    visibility in a windshield, but it's not ok to use polarizing glass for
    visibility in eye glasses?

    you're bullshitting jobst. i use polarized glasses for all these
    applications and they're excellent. you're confusing the human eye's
    inability to cope with excess contrast of glasses that are too dark with
    polarizing.

  10. Joao de Souza said:

    Okay I'm officially confused. I always read about how great polarized
    glasses are for riding and driving. And back in my driving days, I had
    a set of polarized ray-bans that would stay in the car.

    Now I decided to upgrade my Rudy Project cycling sunglasses. I bit the
    bullet, and paid far too much money for a pair of their polarized
    lenses. The lenses just arrived, and they have a "not suitable for
    driving or road use" warning sticker on them. Anyone have any idea why?

    they must have read and regurgitated the great jobst brandt's
    underinformed ravings. just like f.s.a. that bought jobst's design of
    spoke tensiometer, complete with misconception that spoke thickness
    doesn't affect stiffness and therefore deflection.

    Quoted message said:


    I wrote to them asking this same question, but while I wait for their
    official response, I wanted to see if anyone else had this problem.

    its not a problem. i use polarized lenses for riding and driving -
    they're awesome.

  11. Nate Nagel said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >> Okay I'm officially confused. I always read about how great
    >> polarized glasses are for riding and driving. And back in my
    >> driving days, I had a set of polarized ray-bans that would stay
    >> in the car.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >> Now I decided to upgrade my Rudy Project cycling sunglasses. I
    >> bit the bullet, and paid far too much money for a pair of their
    >> polarized lenses. The lenses just arrived, and they have a "not
    >> suitable for driving or road use" warning sticker on them.
    >> Anyone have any idea why?

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >> I wrote to them asking this same question, but while I wait for
    >> their official response, I wanted to see if anyone else had this
    >> problem.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > Polarized lenses help over water, fishing etc.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I'm sold on them for driving, haven't tried them riding yet. I
    have a set of green-tinted polarized prescription Ray-Bans and I
    love them to pieces. The one drawback I've found is that they
    produce very strange interference patterns when looking out
    through car windows with aftermarket tint film, but none of my
    personal vehicles are so equipped so this is a non-issue for me.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Try looking at old VW or other tempered glass windshields. The
    stress in such glass causes all angles of polarization and these
    interfere with sight with Polaroid glasses. Also, the stress
    patterns are strikingly visible with such glasses.

    Quoted message said:

    I don't know if tempered glass has ever been acceptable for windshields
    here in the US, at least for vehicle years likely to be found still on
    the road. My '49 Chevy had laminated glass as well as my '55
    Studebaker, and while I actually know of another '49 Chevy nearby with
    regular license plates on it no less, that's probably getting close to
    the upper limit for age of a vehicle as viable transportation. In fact,
    back when those cars were built, laminated glass was required on *all*
    windows, and it was only later that tempered glass was allowed for side
    and rear windows. AFAIK, laminated ("safety"😉 glass is still required
    on windshields.

    It wasn't then when VW used temepered glass fir windshileds and other
    windows. The reason I mention the windshield is that tempered glass
    crazes into corn kernel sized partiocles that I'm sure may riders have
    seen scattered along roads. However, if the window doesn't fall out,
    it remains as a rough "bathroom window" that does not enable seing
    objects throug it. For this reason a clear, untemepered circular area
    in front of the dirver was anealed to remain transparent in the event
    of a rock crasing the window while driving at speed.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tempered_glass
    http://www.dropgates.com/y2y/glasslogos.html
    http://en.sevenload.com/photos/VbJFKjt-Glas-Securit

    These windows have circular stress patterns that can be seen with
    polarized light or with Polaroid glasses. The window is not polarized
    in any orinetation and its polarization is invisible to the human eye.
    Polaroid glasses wouold not be useful for driving an old VW (pre 1960)
    --
    Jobst Brandt

  12. Nate Nagel said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >> Okay I'm officially confused. I always read about how great
    >> polarized glasses are for riding and driving. And back in my
    >> driving days, I had a set of polarized ray-bans that would stay
    >> in the car.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >> Now I decided to upgrade my Rudy Project cycling sunglasses. I
    >> bit the bullet, and paid far too much money for a pair of their
    >> polarized lenses. The lenses just arrived, and they have a "not
    >> suitable for driving or road use" warning sticker on them.
    >> Anyone have any idea why?

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >> I wrote to them asking this same question, but while I wait for
    >> their official response, I wanted to see if anyone else had this
    >> problem.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > Polarized lenses help over water, fishing etc.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I'm sold on them for driving, haven't tried them riding yet. I
    have a set of green-tinted polarized prescription Ray-Bans and I
    love them to pieces. The one drawback I've found is that they
    produce very strange interference patterns when looking out
    through car windows with aftermarket tint film, but none of my
    personal vehicles are so equipped so this is a non-issue for me.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Try looking at old VW or other tempered glass windshields. The
    stress in such glass causes all angles of polarization and these
    interfere with sight with Polaroid glasses. Also, the stress
    patterns are strikingly visible with such glasses.

    Quoted message said:

    I don't know if tempered glass has ever been acceptable for
    windshields here in the US, at least for vehicle years likely to be
    found still on the road. My '49 Chevy had laminated glass as well
    as my '55 Studebaker, and while I actually know of another '49 Chevy
    nearby with regular license plates on it no less, that's probably
    getting close to the upper limit for age of a vehicle as viable
    transportation. In fact, back when those cars were built, laminated
    glass was required on *all* windows, and it was only later that
    tempered glass was allowed for side and rear windows. AFAIK,
    laminated ("safety"😉 glass is still required on windshields.

    It wasn't at the time when VW used tempered glass for windshields and
    other windows. The reason I mention the windshield is that tempered
    glass crazes into corn kernel sized particles that I'm sure may riders
    have seen scattered along roads. However, if the window doesn't fall
    out, it remains as a rough "bathroom window" through which one cannot
    identify objects. For this reason a clear, untempered circular area
    in front of the diver was annealed to remain transparent in the event
    of a pebble crazing the window while driving at speed.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tempered_glass
    http://www.dropgates.com/y2y/glasslogos.html
    http://en.sevenload.com/photos/VbJFKjt-Glas-Securit

    These windows have circular stress rings that can be seen with
    polarized light or with Polaroid glasses. The window is not polarized
    in any orientation and its polarization is invisible to the human eye.
    Polaroid glasses would not be useful for driving an old VW (pre 1960)

    --
    Jobst Brandt

  13. Quoted message said:
    Nate Nagel said:
    Quoted message said:

    >>> Okay I'm officially confused. I always read about how great
    >>> polarized glasses are for riding and driving. And back in my
    >>> driving days, I had a set of polarized ray-bans that would stay
    >>> in the car.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >>> Now I decided to upgrade my Rudy Project cycling sunglasses. I
    >>> bit the bullet, and paid far too much money for a pair of their
    >>> polarized lenses. The lenses just arrived, and they have a "not
    >>> suitable for driving or road use" warning sticker on them.
    >>> Anyone have any idea why?

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >>> I wrote to them asking this same question, but while I wait for
    >>> their official response, I wanted to see if anyone else had this
    >>> problem.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >> Polarized lenses help over water, fishing etc.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > I'm sold on them for driving, haven't tried them riding yet. I
    > have a set of green-tinted polarized prescription Ray-Bans and I
    > love them to pieces. The one drawback I've found is that they
    > produce very strange interference patterns when looking out
    > through car windows with aftermarket tint film, but none of my
    > personal vehicles are so equipped so this is a non-issue for me.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Try looking at old VW or other tempered glass windshields. The
    stress in such glass causes all angles of polarization and these
    interfere with sight with Polaroid glasses. Also, the stress
    patterns are strikingly visible with such glasses.

    Quoted message said:

    I don't know if tempered glass has ever been acceptable for windshields
    here in the US, at least for vehicle years likely to be found still on
    the road. My '49 Chevy had laminated glass as well as my '55
    Studebaker, and while I actually know of another '49 Chevy nearby with
    regular license plates on it no less, that's probably getting close to
    the upper limit for age of a vehicle as viable transportation. In fact,
    back when those cars were built, laminated glass was required on *all*
    windows, and it was only later that tempered glass was allowed for side
    and rear windows. AFAIK, laminated ("safety"😉 glass is still required
    on windshields.

    It wasn't then when VW used temepered glass fir windshileds and other
    windows. The reason I mention the windshield is that tempered glass
    crazes into corn kernel sized partiocles that I'm sure may riders have
    seen scattered along roads. However, if the window doesn't fall out,
    it remains as a rough "bathroom window" that does not enable seing
    objects throug it. For this reason a clear, untemepered circular area
    in front of the dirver was anealed to remain transparent in the event
    of a rock crasing the window while driving at speed.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tempered_glass
    http://www.dropgates.com/y2y/glasslogos.html
    http://en.sevenload.com/photos/VbJFKjt-Glas-Securit

    These windows have circular stress patterns that can be seen with
    polarized light or with Polaroid glasses. The window is not polarized
    in any orinetation

    rubbish! if that were true, you'd not see the effects! human eyes
    don't detect polarizing. another polarizer otoh detects it easily.

    and polarizing is not shading.

    Quoted message said:

    and its polarization is invisible to the human eye.
    Polaroid glasses wouold not be useful for driving an old VW (pre 1960)

  14. Under certain conditions and directions, light from the sky is polarized. A
    windshield with stresses rotates the direction of polarization, so that,
    when viewed through a Polaroid filter (the glasses) the stresses become
    visible. This is how a polarimiter is used to display stresses.

  15. Leo Lichtman said:

    Under certain conditions and directions, light from the sky is polarized.

    correct.

    Quoted message said:

    A
    windshield with stresses rotates the direction of polarization,

    a polarizer polarizes. it blocks that which is not correctly oriented.

    Quoted message said:

    so that,
    when viewed through a Polaroid filter (the glasses) the stresses become
    visible.

    the interaction is between the polarizing filter and the polarizing
    glass, and this happens even with unpolarized light sources.

    Quoted message said:

    This is how a polarimiter is used to display stresses.

    indeed.

  16. jim beam said:

    [email hidden] wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    These windows have circular stress patterns that can be seen with
    polarized light or with Polaroid glasses. The window is not polarized
    in any orinetation

    rubbish! if that were true, you'd not see the effects! human eyes
    don't detect polarizing. another polarizer otoh detects it easily.

    and polarizing is not shading.

    Careful there. I have not seen the windshields to which Jobst
    refers. However, stress in materials such as glass or plastic
    can introduce birefringence (anisotropic index of refraction),
    which can then be observed with a polarizer. You may need
    the combination of illumination by polarized light (common
    since the blue sky is polarized) and viewing through a polarizer.

    Here's a good example in plastic:
    http://www.oberlin.edu/physics/catalog/demonstrations/optics/birefringence.html
    In the experiment described, two polarizers are used
    (since the illumination is provided by an unpolarized
    overhead projector) and the birefringent material is
    placed between.

    A birefringent material is not itself polarized. If this is
    the cause of the phenomenon Jobst is describing, he
    described it accurately.

    Ben

  17. Living in a country with very harsh sunlight and glare (Australia), I wear polarised sunglasses all the time. I have never encountered the windshield stress pattern effect when sitting inside a car looking out, although it is fairly obvious when walking down the street and looking at windshields on older cars.

    The only time I've had problem with visibility and polarised lenses is in flat light conditions, although I suspect you have more of that in Europe than we do down here.

  18. Quoted message said:
    jim beam said:

    [email hidden] wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    These windows have circular stress patterns that can be seen with
    polarized light or with Polaroid glasses. The window is not polarized
    in any orinetation


    rubbish! if that were true, you'd not see the effects! human eyes
    don't detect polarizing. another polarizer otoh detects it easily.

    and polarizing is not shading.

    Careful there. I have not seen the windshields to which Jobst
    refers.

    all modern cars have them for side and rear glass. you can buy cheapo
    "fishing" glasses from woolmort for ~$5 if you want to see for yourself.

    Quoted message said:

    However, stress in materials such as glass or plastic
    can introduce birefringence (anisotropic index of refraction),
    which can then be observed with a polarizer. You may need
    the combination of illumination by polarized light (common
    since the blue sky is polarized) and viewing through a polarizer.

    you can use non-polarized light - it's still visible.

    Quoted message said:


    Here's a good example in plastic:
    http://www.oberlin.edu/physics/catalog/demonstrations/optics/birefringence.html
    In the experiment described, two polarizers are used
    (since the illumination is provided by an unpolarized
    overhead projector) and the birefringent material is
    placed between.

    A birefringent material is not itself polarized.

    the polarimeter example given by leo. but birefringence arises from
    phasing and orientation does it not? unless i misunderstand, that is
    itself a polarizing effect for each phase, albeit not dichroic.

    Quoted message said:

    If this is
    the cause of the phenomenon Jobst is describing, he
    described it accurately.

    stressed glass is polarizing because of molecular orientation effects.
    it may not be as strong as a polymeric dichroic filter, but it's still
    present.

  19. Joao de Souza said:


    I wrote to them asking this same question, but while I wait for their
    official response, I wanted to see if anyone else had this problem.

    Just got a response from Rudy Project. Apparently that sticker is
    required by law in Australia on all polarized glasses. They believe I
    somehow received a lens that was supposed go down under by mistake.

    But Jobst has a good point about not being able to see wet spots on the
    road......... 🙁

  20. Leo Lichtman said:

    Under certain conditions and directions, light from the sky is polarized. A
    windshield with stresses rotates the direction of polarization, so that,
    when viewed through a Polaroid filter (the glasses) the stresses become
    visible. This is how a polarimiter is used to display stresses.

    Yes, and you can see the stresses in your windscreen if it's the older
    toughened type (but very few cars still have those).

    Polarized glasses are especially good for driving/riding IMO because the
    glare reflecting from the road and off the backs of cars is itself
    polarized the other way from the glasses so they really cut it out.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.