Road Cycling · Public discussion

Polar HRMs

Started by Willowbeauty · · Last activity · 16 posts · 1,536 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
21 July 2003
Last activity
12 August 2003
Original author
Willowbeauty
Posts
16
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,536
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–16 of 16
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I have a Polar X-Trainer HRm and it came bundled with Training Advisor software which is pretty
    useless and ugly to boot (!)

    I see Polar have their new piece of software out called Polar Precision Performance which still
    looks less-then-wonderful but is easier on the eye. I have downloaded the 30-day trial but is there
    anyway of getting the s/w without having to shell out for another HRM?

    Does anyone download into more friendly/useful software than the Polar stuff?

    Thanks Neil

  2. "Willowbeauty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I have a Polar X-Trainer HRm and it came bundled with Training Advisor software which is pretty
    useless and ugly to boot (!)

    I see Polar have their new piece of software out called Polar Precision Performance which still
    looks less-then-wonderful but is easier on the


    eye.

    Quoted message said:

    I have downloaded the 30-day trial but is there anyway of getting the s/w without having to shell
    out for another HRM?

    Does anyone download into more friendly/useful software than the Polar stuff?

    Thanks Neil

    I think they sell it separately. Do they not? Email me if you can't find a source.

    The newer software is a million miles better, isn't it?

  3. Nick, whats your email address? Remove NOSPAM from my reply address, I've had no luck sourcing
    the software.

    "Nick Burns" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Willowbeauty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I have a Polar X-Trainer HRm and it came bundled with Training Advisor software which is pretty
    useless and ugly to boot (!)

    I see Polar have their new piece of software out called Polar Precision Performance which still
    looks less-then-wonderful but is easier on the


    eye.

    Quoted message said:

    I have downloaded the 30-day trial but is there anyway of getting the


    s/w

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    without having to shell out for another HRM?

    Does anyone download into more friendly/useful software than the Polar stuff?

    Thanks Neil

    I think they sell it separately. Do they not? Email me if you can't find a source.

    The newer software is a million miles better, isn't it?

  4. I'm not sure you could make anything easier to use than Polar software, which is why its so
    useless. What do you want to accomplish with it? There's little you can look at with HR alone, so
    the software remains pretty basic. Not much advice here...maybe buy a power meter (just not a
    power tap).

    CH

    "Willowbeauty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    I have a Polar X-Trainer HRm and it came bundled with Training Advisor software which is pretty
    useless and ugly to boot (!)

    I see Polar have their new piece of software out called Polar Precision Performance which still
    looks less-then-wonderful but is easier on the eye. I have downloaded the 30-day trial but is
    there anyway of getting the s/w without having to shell out for another HRM?

    Does anyone download into more friendly/useful software than the Polar stuff?

    Thanks Neil

  5. I have used both, I don't see much difference. I would try to call Polar and see if they will send
    you the CD.

  6. In article <[email hidden]>, Clay Tidwell

    Quoted message said:

    [email hidden] (chris) wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    I'm not sure you could make anything easier to use than Polar software, which is why its so
    useless. What do you want to accomplish with it? There's little you can look at with HR alone,
    so the software remains pretty basic. Not much advice here...maybe buy a power meter (just not a
    power tap).

    CH

    Why not a PowerTap?

    For one thing, a powertap is for just one wheel. Take your pick, race wheel OR training wheel.

    -WG

  7. "warren" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>, Clay Tidwell

    Quoted message said:

    [email hidden] (chris) wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    I'm not sure you could make anything easier to use than Polar software, which is why its so
    useless. What do you want to accomplish with it? There's little you can look at with HR alone,
    so the software remains pretty basic. Not much advice here...maybe buy a power meter (just not
    a power tap).

    CH

    Why not a PowerTap?

    For one thing, a powertap is for just one wheel. Take your pick, race wheel OR training wheel.

    Perhaps so, but I'd still like to hear what Chris' reasons are.

  8. FYI: I have actually used a Power tap (pre-Graber), so I'm not just talking about things I've heard.
    Serveral reasons Robert:
    1. It seems to not want to work at the most inopportune times; this comes from several people,
    including myself.
    2. It sucks up the batteries a little too fast.
    3. You could get a good one or a bad one; get a bad one and you may as well throw it away.
    4. The software sucks
    5. Warren's reason; that damn hub is heavy, no matter what rim you buy it'll be a heavy wheel. My
    SRM cranks weigh in about the same as my Chorus cranks.
    6. I've heard they have a high return/repair rate.
    7. ALL OF THE ABOVE: If you only use your power meter part of the time, you should have just saved
    your money.

    I may have fogotten something, but I think that sums it up. Compare the guys who own SRM's vs.
    power taps and you'll see that most power tap users are part-timers, the majority of SRM users (not
    pro's) are full time users. Now, the SRM does have its problems, but its still the best on the
    market...for now.

    CH

    "Robert Chung" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    "warren" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>, Clay Tidwell <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    [email hidden] (chris) wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...
    > I'm not sure you could make anything easier to use than Polar software, which is why its so
    > useless. What do you want to accomplish with it? There's little you can look at with HR
    > alone, so the software remains pretty basic. Not much advice here...maybe buy a power meter
    > (just not a power tap).
    >
    > CH

    Why not a PowerTap?

    For one thing, a powertap is for just one wheel. Take your pick, race wheel OR training wheel.

    Perhaps so, but I'd still like to hear what Chris' reasons are.

  9. "chris" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Not much advice here...maybe buy a power meter (just not a power tap).

    and then:

    Quoted message said:

    FYI: I have actually used a Power tap (pre-Graber), so I'm not just talking about things I've
    heard. Serveral reasons Robert:
    1. It seems to not want to work at the most inopportune times; this comes from several people,
    including myself.
    2. It sucks up the batteries a little too fast.
    3. You could get a good one or a bad one; get a bad one and you may as well throw it away.
    4. The software sucks
    5. Warren's reason; that damn hub is heavy, no matter what rim you buy it'll be a heavy wheel. My
    SRM cranks weigh in about the same as my Chorus cranks.
    6. I've heard they have a high return/repair rate.
    7. ALL OF THE ABOVE: If you only use your power meter part of the time, you should have just saved
    your money.

    I may have fogotten something, but I think that sums it up. Compare the guys who own SRM's vs.
    power taps and you'll see that most power tap users are part-timers, the majority of SRM users
    (not pro's) are full time users. Now, the SRM does have its problems, but its still the best on
    the market...for now.

    CH

    So when you said, "maybe buy a power meter" you meant, "buy the SRM?"

  10. Actually, no...because you'll also note I said:

    Now, the SRM does have its problems, but its still the best on the market...for now.

    Chung said:

    So when you said, "maybe buy a power meter" you meant, "buy the SRM?"

  11. "chris" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Chung said:

    So when you said, "maybe buy a power meter" you meant, "buy the SRM?"

    Actually, no...because you'll also note I said:

    Now, the SRM does have its problems, but its still the best on the


    market...for now.

    So now I'm confused. There are only three power meters widely available on the market. You said that
    the OP might want to consider buying a power meter, but specifically advised against the PT. So what
    did you have in mind when you wrote "maybe buy a power meter (just not a power tap)?"

  12. www.ergomo.de

    "Robert Chung" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    "chris" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Chung said:

    So when you said, "maybe buy a power meter" you meant, "buy the SRM?"

    Actually, no...because you'll also note I said:

    Now, the SRM does have its problems, but its still the best on the


    market...for now.

    So now I'm confused. There are only three power meters widely available on the market. You said
    that the OP might want to consider buying a power meter, but specifically advised against the PT.
    So what did you have in mind when you wrote "maybe buy a power meter (just not a power tap)?"

  13. [email hidden] (chris) wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    www.ergomo.de

    At $1200 per unit, I'd like to know that this meter worked at least as well as the SRM. Have you
    been able to ride on one yet? I've heard that power is measured on one side of the bb and then
    doubled for the actual wattage reading. Can't help wondering about accuracy

  14. In article <[email hidden]>, Clay Tidwell

    Quoted message said:

    [email hidden] (chris) wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    www.ergomo.de

    At $1200 per unit, I'd like to know that this meter worked at least as well as the SRM. Have you
    been able to ride on one yet? I've heard that power is measured on one side of the bb and then
    doubled for the actual wattage reading. Can't help wondering about accuracy

    It seems to be observing the amount of flex in the BB spindle to obtain the measurements.

    -WG

  15. Clay Tidwell said:

    [email hidden] (chris) wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    www.ergomo.de

    At $1200 per unit, I'd like to know that this meter worked at least as well as the SRM. Have you
    been able to ride on one yet? I've heard that power is measured on one side of the bb and then
    doubled for the actual wattage reading.

    The official response from Ergomo is that it does measure off one side (the left). I haven't yet
    seen a comparison with any other power meter so I dont know if this is a big problem or a little
    one. As for comparisons with the SRM, some samples of the SRM amateur are reported to have
    calibration slopes that vary with the orientation of the crank.

  16. I can provide you with comparisons if you contact me directly. It has been used extensively in
    Europe and some in the U.S. with strong agreement. I also know they (Ergomo) have done comparisons
    with SRM. I hope to also compare these in an upcoming study this fall.

    From what I've seen and know, had I the choice to buy again I would buy the Ergomo. I want to buy
    one now but cash is tight.

    CH

    "Robert Chung" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Clay Tidwell said:

    [email hidden] (chris) wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    www.ergomo.de

    At $1200 per unit, I'd like to know that this meter worked at least as well as the SRM. Have you
    been able to ride on one yet? I've heard that power is measured on one side of the bb and then
    doubled for the actual wattage reading.

    The official response from Ergomo is that it does measure off one side (the left). I haven't yet
    seen a comparison with any other power meter so I dont know if this is a big problem or a little
    one. As for comparisons with the SRM, some samples of the SRM amateur are reported to have
    calibration slopes that vary with the orientation of the crank.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.