Please would you could you see your way clear to using one of your vast array of witty and epigrammatic put-downs? I relish the prospect with a quivering heart: should you not do this gratuitously, just name a subject about which you wish to be embarrassingly incorrect. That should engender sufficient frustration for the insult you direct at me to be authentic.
In fact, to save time you do not need to name a subject: all subjects meet the criteria.
"Justin Lewis" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Please would you could you see your way clear to using one of your vast array of witty and epigrammatic put-downs? I relish the prospect with a quivering heart: should you not do this gratuitously, just name a subject about which you wish to be embarrassingly incorrect. That should engender sufficient frustration for the insult you direct at me to be authentic.
In fact, to save time you do not need to name a subject: all subjects meet the criteria.
I am calling you a liar.
Your reaction here (and elsewhere) is completely out of character with the person you claim to be. You act more like a student that has recently acquired Usenet access (and I won't go down the road of the other attributes). You were angry and adolescent from your first article until this one. I don't care if you grow up or not, but please don't think that you are fooling anyone.
Keep putting yourself out there as a target, or go away. It is your decision. Try doing it with a smile though.
"Justin Lewis" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Please would you could you see your way clear to using one of your vast array of witty and epigrammatic put-downs? I relish the prospect with a quivering heart: should you not do this gratuitously, just name a subject about which you wish to be embarrassingly incorrect.
<snip>
Dumbass -
OK.
Thanks again, for being stupid enough to be ripped off by Bianchi. That [censored] frame you bought cost about $30 in material and labor, with maybe another $30 for painting and shipping. The many Euros they made off that sucker deal undoubtedly went a long way towards treating us bike racing fans to some bodacious summer entertainment.
What would this summer's TdF have been like without Jan Ullrich?
Thanks to Bianchi, but thanks more to you, The Enabler. Us bike racing fans here at rbr are grateful.
"Justin Lewis" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Please would you could you see your way clear to using one of your vast array of witty and epigrammatic put-downs? I relish the prospect with a quivering heart: should you not do this gratuitously, just name a subject about which you wish to be embarrassingly incorrect. That should engender sufficient frustration for the insult you direct at me to be authentic.
In fact, to save time you do not need to name a subject: all subjects meet the criteria.
I am calling you a liar.
Your reaction here (and elsewhere) is completely out of character with the person you claim to be. You act more like a student that has recently acquired Usenet access (and I won't go down the road of the other attributes). You were angry and adolescent from your first article until this one. I don't care if you grow up or not, but please don't think that you are fooling anyone.
Keep putting yourself out there as a target, or go away. It is your decision. Try doing it with a smile though.
That is all for now.
Little Nick,
This is so disappointing. I asked to be called Dumbass and you were very obliging but did not quite manage it. "Liar" is nice though: it has an uncanny ring to it. Oooh!
"Justin Lewis" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Please would you could you see your way clear to using one of your vast array of witty and epigrammatic put-downs? I relish the prospect with a quivering heart: should you not do this gratuitously, just name a subject about which you wish to be embarrassingly incorrect.
<snip>
Dumbass -
OK.
Thanks again, for being stupid enough to be ripped off by Bianchi. That [censored] frame you bought cost about $30 in material and labor, with maybe another $30 for painting and shipping. The many Euros they made off that sucker deal undoubtedly went a long way towards treating us bike racing fans to some bodacious summer entertainment.
What would this summer's TdF have been like without Jan Ullrich?
Thanks to Bianchi, but thanks more to you, The Enabler. Us bike racing fans here at rbr are grateful.
Well Kurgie,
That was a pathetic and predictable reply. But we are getting somewhere: you at RBR do agree that Bianchi "rip off" people. Would you put that on your site?
What are you trying to do with this post? Since it has nothing to do with bike racing, or even bikes, and your previous post about your broken frame seems to have run it's course so I don't understand what you are trying to achieve with this post.
I guess that you are trying to start a confrontation of some kind, but that seems to be a total waste of your time. Don't you have anything more productive to do with your time?
I should state that I wasn't against you in the Bianchis debate as I don't claim to understand EU consumer laws.
"Justin Lewis" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Please would you could you see your way clear to using one of your vast array of witty and epigrammatic put-downs? I relish the prospect with a quivering heart: should you not do this gratuitously, just name a subject about which you wish to be embarrassingly incorrect. That should engender sufficient frustration for the insult you direct at me to be authentic.
In fact, to save time you do not need to name a subject: all subjects meet the criteria.
"Justin Lewis" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Well Kurgie,
That was a pathetic and predictable reply. But we are getting somewhere: you at RBR do agree that Bianchi "rip off" people. Would you put that on your site?
Dumbass -
When I buy a lightweight frame, I consider less reliability as something that comes with the territory.
Can't have the best performance (lightness) and the best reliability in the same frame. The two qualities are not compatible. Racing bikes are skewed towards performance (lightness) because that is what the customers demand. If you want reliability, buy a non-racing commuting bike. Those are heavy and designed to last.
What are you trying to do with this post? Since it has nothing to do with bike racing, or even bikes, and your previous post about your broken frame seems to have run it's course so I don't understand what you are trying to achieve with this post.
"Kurgan Gringioni" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
snip
Dumbass -
I got under his skin.
It's not hard.
K. Gringioni declaring victory
<snip>
You, and many other members, have a tendency to be a bit caustic but most move on other topics on other days. Justin seems be at another level. I hope that he is OK, and finds what he is looking for.
"Kurgan Gringioni" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
snip
Dumbass -
I got under his skin.
It's not hard.
K. Gringioni declaring victory
<snip>
You, and many other members, have a tendency to be a bit caustic but most move on other topics on other days. Justin seems be at another level. I hope that he is OK, and finds what he is looking for.
Please would you could you see your way clear to using one of your vast array of witty and epigrammatic put-downs? I relish the prospect with a quivering heart: should you not do this gratuitously, just name a subject about which you wish to be embarrassingly incorrect. That should engender sufficient frustration for the insult you direct at me to be authentic.
....
j.l. ESQ.,
PLEASE STICK TO THE CHARTER OF THE rbr NEWSGROUP. THANKS! Else TAKE IT TO email because you are being schooled here.
"h squared" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
gwhite said:
Quoted message said:
Is this lewis fellow arroon canninnoo in disguise?
i thought that too. not a very good disguise even..
heather
I think not, only because AAron seemed to learn a bit about how things worked before he want AWOL. IOW, they have lots of personality traits in common, but this one seems too gullible at this point (I know, as ridiculous as that sounds).
You, and many other members, have a tendency to be a bit caustic but most move on other topics on other days. Justin seems be at another level. I hope that he is OK, and finds what he is looking for.