General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

PING sf

Started by margaret suran · · Last activity · 12 posts · 202 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
14 October 2007
Last activity
16 October 2007
Original author
margaret suran
Posts
12
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
202
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–12 of 12
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I have been trying to send you an email, but keep getting a message box
    saying that there is no such address. HELP!

  2. margaret suran said:

    I have been trying to send you an email, but keep getting a message box
    saying that there is no such address. HELP!

    Sorry, Margaret.... I added a >🙂 to the end of it recently for spam
    control since they seem to be harvesting headers now. I need to amend
    my sig line to state that.

    Incidentally, this problem is the perfect example of why I don't like
    to munge my address. Maybe I'll go back to the old "at" thing, except
    I would think they've got that one figured out by this time.

    --
    See return address to reply by email
    remove the smiley face first

  3. sf said:
    margaret suran said:

    I have been trying to send you an email, but keep getting a message box
    saying that there is no such address. HELP!

    Sorry, Margaret.... I added a >🙂 to the end of it recently for spam
    control since they seem to be harvesting headers now. I need to amend
    my sig line to state that.

    Incidentally, this problem is the perfect example of why I don't like
    to munge my address. Maybe I'll go back to the old "at" thing, except
    I would think they've got that one figured out by this time.


    It still does not work. I tried deleting the >🙂, then one symbol after
    the other, but nothing works. Sorry!

  4. margaret suran said:
    sf said:
    margaret suran said:

    I have been trying to send you an email, but keep getting a message box
    saying that there is no such address. HELP!

    Sorry, Margaret.... I added a >🙂 to the end of it recently for spam
    control since they seem to be harvesting headers now. I need to amend
    my sig line to state that.

    Incidentally, this problem is the perfect example of why I don't like
    to munge my address. Maybe I'll go back to the old "at" thing, except
    I would think they've got that one figured out by this time.


    It still does not work. I tried deleting the >🙂, then one symbol after
    the other, but nothing works. Sorry!

    Try again. It's completely unmunged now.

    I think both of us communicate with Jill, so maybe she would be
    willing to act as an intermediary if the problem continues.

    --
    See return address to reply by email

  5. sf said:
    margaret suran said:
    sf said:

    On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 08:28:23 -0400, margaret suran
    <[email hidden]> wrote:

    > I have been trying to send you an email, but keep getting a message box
    > saying that there is no such address. HELP!
    Sorry, Margaret.... I added a >🙂 to the end of it recently for spam
    control since they seem to be harvesting headers now. I need to amend
    my sig line to state that.

    Incidentally, this problem is the perfect example of why I don't like
    to munge my address. Maybe I'll go back to the old "at" thing, except
    I would think they've got that one figured out by this time.


    It still does not work. I tried deleting the >🙂, then one symbol after
    the other, but nothing works. Sorry!

    Try again. It's completely unmunged now.

    I think both of us communicate with Jill, so maybe she would be
    willing to act as an intermediary if the problem continues.


    I believe it worked now! Please, let me know.

  6. margaret suran said:

    I believe it worked now! Please, let me know.

    Thank you Margaret, it is in my inbox and I will reply ASAP.

    🙂
    sf

    --
    See return address to reply by email
    remove the smiley face first

  7. margaret suran said:
    Quoted message said:


    I believe it worked now! Please, let me know.

    Got it and my return reply is in the mail. Thanks!

    🙂

    --
    See return address to reply by email
    remove the smiley face first

  8. sf said:
    margaret suran said:
    Quoted message said:


    I believe it worked now! Please, let me know.

    Got it and my return reply is in the mail. Thanks!

    🙂

    Horray!

    -sw

  9. On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 01:41:53 GMT, Sqwertz <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    sf said:
    margaret suran said:

    >
    I believe it worked now! Please, let me know.

    Got it and my return reply is in the mail. Thanks!

    🙂

    Horray!

    <Wiping brow>

    --
    See return address to reply by email
    remove the smiley face first

  10. sf said:
    margaret suran said:
    sf said:

    On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 08:28:23 -0400, margaret suran
    <[email hidden]> wrote:

    > I have been trying to send you an email, but keep getting a
    > message box saying that there is no such address. HELP!

    Sorry, Margaret.... I added a >🙂 to the end of it recently for
    spam control since they seem to be harvesting headers now. I need
    to amend my sig line to state that.

    Incidentally, this problem is the perfect example of why I don't
    like to munge my address. Maybe I'll go back to the old "at"
    thing, except I would think they've got that one figured out by
    this time.


    It still does not work. I tried deleting the >🙂, then one symbol
    after the other, but nothing works. Sorry!

    Try again. It's completely unmunged now.

    I think both of us communicate with Jill, so maybe she would be
    willing to act as an intermediary if the problem continues.

    Certainly! 🙂

    Jill

  11. jmcquown said:

    sf wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    I think both of us communicate with Jill, so maybe she would be
    willing to act as an intermediary if the problem continues.

    Certainly! 🙂

    Jill


    Thank you, I know I could always depend on you.

    It's nice to have you for a friend.

  12. margaret suran said:
    jmcquown said:

    sf wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    I think both of us communicate with Jill, so maybe she would be
    willing to act as an intermediary if the problem continues.

    Certainly! 🙂

    Jill


    Thank you, I know I could always depend on you.

    It's nice to have you for a friend.

    Thank you, Margaret! You are a very dear friend and I adore you. I love
    hearing about your dinners with Marcel, too 🙂

    Jill

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.