PING: Bob (this one)

On Sun 20 Feb 2005 09:00:32a, Rick & Cyndi wrote in rec.food.cooking:

Quoted message said:

"Bob (this one)" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Steve Calvin said:

Bob (this one) wrote:

> I'm abjectly apologetic that I didn't reply in the precise fashions
> you'd have liked me to. Perhaps we can create some templates for
> correct reaction to your posts.

Yeah, the template would be to *quit freekin' cross-posting*!!

Is that clear and quickly enough to the point for your ass?

<LOL> Here. Sit down. Breathe in... breathe out... breathe in...
breathe out...

When you were in the school safety patrol, did you wear one of those
cool white belts that went around your waist and over your shoulder. I
thought they were cool. Big badge on it...

No, seriously...

Bob
============

I am sooooo lost.

I think I read through one of the postings that had "Chung" in the
subject... it didn't appear of interest to me so I ignored it. <shrug>
I guess I missed something.

What's all the uproar about? If anyone didn't want to read about
"Chung" why didn't they just ignore the postings?

I don't even want to see OT headers that are soooo far OT as to be of
little if any interest to any regular poster in this group. I don't take
it personally, but I find it irritating as hell. Luckily, using the score
file in Xnews, I actually see absolutely none of it.

Quoted message said:

NOTE about safety patrols, our schools always had orange belts with the
big silver badge. Wanna hear a story?

Well, er, no... Much as I like you Cyndi, I didn't find this interesting
either. :-) Sorry.

Cheers!
Wayne

On Sun 20 Feb 2005 11:02:19a, ravinwulf wrote in rec.food.cooking:

Quoted message said:

Rick & Cyndi said:

I think I read through one of the postings that had "Chung" in the
subject... it didn't appear of interest to me so I ignored it. <shrug>
I guess I missed something.

What's all the uproar about? If anyone didn't want to read about
"Chung" why didn't they just ignore the postings?

Yes, we could just ignore the postings; but why should we have to do
that? "Dr." Chung is a troll, plain and simple, who started cross
posting here thanks, IIRC, to Mr. Pasterino. Mr. Pasterino continues
to x-post his flames and post new OT threads flaming this net kook,
despite being asked by numerous people to stop. It makes the newsgroup
harder for others to enjoy and it's completely pointless to boot.
Don't you think that's just a little rude on his part?

Regards,
Tracy R.

Yes, more than a little rude.

Wayne

On Sun 20 Feb 2005 12:04:17p, Bob (this one) wrote in rec.food.cooking:

Quoted message said:

And I always remember to put the seat back down.

Pastorio

Do you always remember to put the seat up in the first place, or do you just
pee on the seat, as you seem to do so in rfc?

I used to really enjoy your posts, but you've insinuated your exchange about
Mr. Chung, et. al., far too long.

Regards,
Wayne

On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 22:00:16 GMT, I said, "Pick a card, any card"
and gekko <[email hidden]> instead replied:

Quoted message said:

So it isn't a triple-dark-fudge brownie with a scoop of vanilla bean
icecream on top, but "Bob (this one)" <[email hidden]> did write
something interesting in news:[email hidden]:

Quoted message said:

Actually, I didn't initiate the crossposting. Except where I did.
And in that case, I was just following orders from higher-ups.

You ever work at Abu Ghraib?

Aw, let's kill this one early, Gekko.

Surely you meant work as a NAZI for [censored] and not work at Abu
Ghraib.
--
Ray

On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 14:04:17 -0500, "Bob (this one)" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

ravinwulf said:

Rick & Cyndi said:

I think I read through one of the postings that had "Chung" in the
subject... it didn't appear of interest to me so I ignored it. <shrug> I
guess I missed something.

What's all the uproar about? If anyone didn't want to read about "Chung"
why didn't they just ignore the postings?

Yes, we could just ignore the postings; but why should we have to do
that?

For the same reason that you ignore advertising. And mail you didn't
request. And panhandlers. And traffic. And the whining of people like you.

Oh, so it's your God given right to be a rude jackass. By your own
admission, you're basically just Usenet's version of a telemarketer.
Gotcha, now I know exactly how to deal with you.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

"Dr." Chung is a troll, plain and simple, who started cross
posting here thanks, IIRC, to Mr. Pasterino.

Dear sludgewit ravinwulf:
If Chung crossposted here first, how could it be "thanks to Mr.
Pasterino?" Very clear thinking there...

He cross posted here while chasing after you because you're too stupid
to ignore a troll. You brought him to RFC. Nice try though.

Quoted message said:

Chung is a great deal more and a great deal less than "a troll, plain
and simple." Were you able to get beyond your simplistic and simpleton
understandings, you might grasp that.

No, he's not.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Mr. Pasterino continues
to x-post his flames and post new OT threads flaming this net kook,
despite being asked by numerous people to stop. It makes the newsgroup
harder for others to enjoy and it's completely pointless to boot.

It's such a desperate and lofty burden to *not* read some posts. I
know how hard it is...

The more kill filters you add to your news reader, the slower it
processes the headers. Idiot. But no fear, you will not bother me any
more. 🙂

Regards,
Tracy R.

On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 07:07:25 -0800, "The Ranger"
<[email hidden]> wrote:

<snip>

Quoted message said:

ObFood: The latest issue of Fine Cooking is AWESOME! (A topic was even
stolen -- word-for-word -- from it's pages on New Potatoes.) Tried the
Roasted Red Potatoes with Onions, Thyme, and Sherry Vinegar last night.
Scrumptious!

So, are you gonna post the recipe or am I going to have to come over
there and slap you around a little?

Terry "Squeaks" Pulliam Burd
AAC(F)BV66.0748.CA

"If the soup had been as hot as the claret, if the claret had been as
old as the bird, and if the bird's breasts had been as full as the
waitress's, it would have been a very good dinner."

-- Duncan Hines

To reply, replace "spaminator" with "cox"

Terry Pulliam Burd said:

On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 07:07:25 -0800, "The Ranger"
<[email hidden]> wrote:

<snip>

Quoted message said:

ObFood: The latest issue of Fine Cooking is AWESOME! (A
topic was even stolen -- word-for-word -- from it's
pages on New Potatoes.) Tried the Roasted Red Potatoes
with Onions, Thyme, and Sherry Vinegar last night.
Scrumptious!

So, are you gonna post the recipe or am I going to have
to come over there and slap you around a little?

Nah. Just a tease, no recipe. You really want anything in *this* thread
to be *on* topic?
;-)

BOB

In article <[email hidden]>,

BOB said:

Terry Pulliam Burd said:

On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 07:07:25 -0800, "The Ranger"
<[email hidden]> wrote:

<snip>

Quoted message said:

ObFood: The latest issue of Fine Cooking is AWESOME! (A
topic was even stolen -- word-for-word -- from it's
pages on New Potatoes.) Tried the Roasted Red Potatoes
with Onions, Thyme, and Sherry Vinegar last night.
Scrumptious!

So, are you gonna post the recipe or am I going to have
to come over there and slap you around a little?

Nah. Just a tease, no recipe. You really want anything in *this* thread
to be *on* topic?
;-)

BOB

Especially since this thread is getting as silly as the Chung threads!
Sheesh guys! I've only not killed the thread because Pastorio's replies
to it are so entertaining! ;-)
--
Om.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-[censored]." -Jack Nicholson

Terry Pulliam Burd <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 07:07:25 -0800, The Ranger

Quoted message said:

<snip>

Quoted message said:

ObFood: The latest issue of Fine Cooking is AWESOME! (A
topic was even stolen -- word-for-word -- from it's pages on
New Potatoes.) Tried the Roasted Red Potatoes with Onions,
Thyme, and Sherry Vinegar last night. Scrumptious!

So, are you gonna post the recipe or am I going to have to come
over there and slap you around a little?

<sigh> Where were you fifteen years ago?

<EG>

Yes, I'll post the recipe later tonight after we enjoy the chili and
cornbread recipes.

The Ranger

Dog3 said:

Quoted message said:

That's the best way. I'd gotten set with Xananews for that reason,

then

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

the cumpnee news server broke, so here I am using Google. No

filtering

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

at all. Blech.

Quoted message said:

Brian, check out Xnews http://www.webattack.com/get/xnews.shtml It

takes a

Quoted message said:

small amount of tweaking but I've been happy with it. Try the

freeware

Quoted message said:

version first and then buy the entire version if you are happy with

it.

I did previously, I don't care for Xnews' user interface. I prefer
Xananews. The filtering isn't quite as sophisticated as Xnews/slrn but
it's pretty good. That's if we ever get usenet access back.

Brian

ravinwulf said:

Bob (this one) said:

ravinwulf said:

On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 16:00:32 GMT, "Rick & Cyndi"
<[email hidden]> wrote:

> I think I read through one of the postings that had "Chung"
> in the subject... it didn't appear of interest to me so I
> ignored it. <shrug> I guess I missed something.
>
> What's all the uproar about? If anyone didn't want to read
> about "Chung" why didn't they just ignore the postings?

Yes, we could just ignore the postings; but why should we have
to do that?

For the same reason that you ignore advertising. And mail you
didn't request. And panhandlers. And traffic. And the whining of
people like you.

Oh, so it's your God given right to be a rude jackass.

Exactly. Just like it is - oh so obviously - yours. It's a moment of
serious hilarity when you, in your crushingly vulgar, lightweight way,
assail me for rudeness. Your silly, off-the-mark conclusions, your
blunt-instrument reasoning, your unfortunate inability to see yourself
and your generally not-too-bright ways.

Quoted message said:

By your own admission, you're basically just Usenet's version of a
telemarketer. Gotcha, now I know exactly how to deal with you.

<LOL> You're too much a featherweight to really come after. By my own
admission, I say that there are things that are funny in the world.
That there are things not so desperately important that you should
get your undies all atwist. That you seem to need a blast of oxygen to
clear the brain and recognize priorities.

If all you've gotten from my posts is that by my "own admission, [I'm]
basically just Usenet's version of a telemarketer," then your stunted
capacities are sadly but clearly on neon display. If, OTOH, you think,
as you seem to, that this is an example of sharp repartee, then you
should park in the handicapped spaces.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

"Dr." Chung is a troll, plain and simple, who started cross
posting here thanks, IIRC, to Mr. Pasterino.

Dear sludgewit ravinwulf: If Chung crossposted here first, how
could it be "thanks to Mr. Pasterino?" Very clear thinking
there...

He cross posted here while chasing after you because you're too
stupid to ignore a troll. You brought him to RFC. Nice try though.

<LOL> Chung followed me so it's my fault. With reasoning like that, I
bet you had you PhD before you were 20.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Chung is a great deal more and a great deal less than "a troll,
plain and simple." Were you able to get beyond your simplistic
and simpleton understandings, you might grasp that.

No, he's not.

<snerk> Well, I guess that clears it right up. How could anyone ever
think otherwise now that ravinwulf has pronounced the truth. Sounds
more like "I know the absolute truth" Chung with each passing
sentence... Same brilliant reading comprehension, too.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Mr. Pasterino

Um, that's still Pastorio. P-a-s-t-o-r-i-o.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

continues to x-post his flames and post new OT threads flaming
this net kook, despite being asked by numerous people to stop.
It makes the newsgroup harder for others to enjoy and it's
completely pointless to boot.

It's such a desperate and lofty burden to *not* read some posts.
I know how hard it is...

The more kill filters you add to your news reader,

Um, note that I didn't say anything about filters. I said *not* read
some posts. That means to, um, *not* read some posts. Just don't read
them. You know, like don't click on them to read them. Just *not* read
them.

Quoted message said:

the slower it processes the headers. Idiot.

I bet if you put 2,000,000 filters on your system, it would slow
things down to where they would be just a *tiny* bit too fast for you...

Quoted message said:

But no fear, you will not bother me any more. 🙂

Oh, I suspect I will. But if putting in many filters is sooooo
burdensome, just put my name in there alone. And I'm so shattered that
you would remove my hugely informative, dazzlingly funny and
reasonably well punctuated posts. Shattered, I tell you.

Quoted message said:

Regards, Tracy R.

Hey, Trace, regards to you, too. And the horse you rode in on.

And I mean that in the nicest possible way.

For both you and the horse.

No, seriously...

Pastorio

Bob,

I'm sure you don't think so, but this whole "thing" of yours, i.e., cross-
posting, Chung, et. al., and trying to justify it, etc., has really become
tiresome and lacking of any interest to almost every regular poster here.

Why not just give it up and go back to being the Bob Pastorio we all enjoyed.

No, seriously!

Wayne