Road Cycling · Public discussion

Pinarella FP Due stock stem length

Started by landdnl · · Last activity · 7 posts · 1,630 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
27 July 2013
Last activity
12 August 2013
Original author
landdnl
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,630
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I'm looking at getting either a FP Due(size 47) or a ROKH(size 46). What stem length does Pinarello put on their preassembled bikes? I need about 100mm. These are my recommendations from Competitive fit calculator which are spot on where it counts(Top tube length/stem length). Seat tube length not so much but there's too many variables to get this accurate anyway. Seat tube range c-c 48.5 - 49.0 Seat tube range c-t 50.0 - 50.5 Top tube length 51.7 - 52.1 Stem Length 9.9 - 10.5 BB-Saddle Position 69.8 - 71.8 Saddle-Handlebar 47.1 - 47.7 Saddle Setback 1.4 - 1.8 This bike is going to be used for long rides, but I also want to be somewhat quick out of the gate. Any preferences between the two?

  2. stems go in increments of 10mm, so it would be 90mm - 100mm - 110mm etc how tall are you by the way ?

  3. I'm 150cm tall with 74cm inseam.

  4. Quoted post said:

    Originally Posted by landdnl [IMG]/img/forum/go_quote.gif[/IMG]

    I'm looking at getting either a FP Due(size 47) or a ROKH(size 46).[FONT= Verdana] What stem length does Pinarello put on their preassembled bikes? I need about 100mm. These are my recommendations from Competitive fit calculator which are spot on where it counts(Top tube length/stem length). Seat tube length not so much but there's too many variables to get this accurate anyway.[/FONT] [FONT= Verdana]Seat tube range c-c 48.5 - 49.0[/FONT] [FONT= Verdana]Seat tube range c-t 50.0 - 50.5[/FONT] [FONT= Verdana]Top tube length 51.7 - 52.1[/FONT] [FONT= Verdana]Stem Length 9.9 - 10.5[/FONT] [FONT= Verdana]BB-Saddle Position 69.8 - 71.8[/FONT] [FONT= Verdana]Saddle-Handlebar 47.1 - 47.7[/FONT] [FONT= Verdana]Saddle Setback 1.4 - 1.8[/FONT] [FONT= Verdana]This bike is going to be used for long rides, but I also want to be somewhat quick out of the gate. [/FONT]Any preferences between the two?


    FWIW. I would not worry about the stem which the Pinarello (or, any other bike) comes with ...

    • the handlebar's bend AND how it is oriented (that is, how the horizontal the actual drop portion of the handlebar is) will affect the reach ... so, top tube length & stem length & saddle setback (without apparently differentiating the seatpost's cradle offset!) are interesting specs whose range should be taken as approximations AND the information provided should not be taken as definitive
    • if you take the shortest of all the parameters & compare it with the longest of all the parameters, then by my reckoning you will have a possible difference of about 3cm +/-
    • regardless, your fitness & flexibility & (evolving) riding style will affect the final dimensions indicated AND could change over time

    In the long run, unless the frame is truly the wrong size (vs. a change in your aesthetic preferences), you will probably be much happier if you buy the Pinarello.

  5. Quoted post said:

    Originally Posted by alfeng [IMG]/img/forum/go_quote.gif[/IMG]

    FWIW. I would not worry about the stem which the Pinarello (or, any other bike) comes with ...

    • the handlebar's bend AND how it is oriented (that is, how the horizontal the actual drop portion of the handlebar is) will affect the reach ... so, top tube length & stem length & saddle setback (without apparently differentiating the seatpost's cradle offset!) are interesting specs whose range should be taken as approximations AND the information provided should not be taken as definitive
    • if you take the shortest of all the parameters & compare it with the longest of all the parameters, then by my reckoning you will have a possible difference of about 3cm +/-
    • regardless, your fitness & flexibility & (evolving) riding style will affect the final dimensions indicated AND could change over time

    In the long run, unless the frame is truly the wrong size (vs. a change in your aesthetic preferences), you will probably be much happier if you buy the Pinarello.

    You're right. I've been using FSA K-Wings that have the flattened top so there's less latitude on rotating the bars. I ride with my hands on the tops while climbing and on the hoods the rest of the time. I guess I had this mindset when I asked the Stem length question.

  6. ok your height vs frame size sounds correct, but please double check before you buy, if you are buying a new bike, a quality bike like Pinarello, i think it is your prerogative to ask for a specific measurement of the stem and even other accessories, in your case the 100mm you were thinking of,

  7. I bought a 55cm FP DUE and sent it back last week. It is more of a comfort bike, and didn't fit like toher bikes of the same labeled size (it felt bigger). On the 55cm, it came with a 130 stem and 44 handlebars.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.