Road Cycling · Public discussion

Pile up in the TdF

Started by Ken M · · Last activity · 125 posts · 2,836 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
7 July 2005
Last activity
18 July 2005
Original author
Ken M
Posts
125
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,836
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 125
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I just saw this awful pile up! Must have been like 15 or 20 riders. It
    was in a wet corner. Lance managed to avoid getting caught in it.

    But something else I have noticed, they have REALLY nice streets to
    ride in over there! Now I am sure it is because they are in the
    spotlight. But still! They look far nicer than the streets I get to
    ride on!

    Ken

  2. Quoted message said:

    I just saw this awful pile up! Must have been like 15 or 20 riders. It
    was in a wet corner. Lance managed to avoid getting caught in it.

    That's why you don't apply your brakes *in* a wet corner.

    Quoted message said:

    But something else I have noticed, they have REALLY nice streets to
    ride in over there! Now I am sure it is because they are in the
    spotlight. But still! They look far nicer than the streets I get to
    ride on!

    Ken

    Streets and roads chosen for the TDF are either already in very good shape
    or resurfaced prior to the. The exception would be for sections chosen
    deliberately for their... character? Such as that nasty cobblestone stage
    last year. But in general it's rare that they ride on bad road surfaces.
    Narrow & twisty add enough to the danger.

    --Mike Jacoubowsky
    Chain Reaction Bicycles
    www.ChainReaction.com
    Redwood City & Los Altos, CA USA

  3. Nice streets?? Ever try riding on wet cobblestones with 3/4-inch
    tires?

    Steve McDonald

  4. Yes. Don't.

    "Steve McDonald" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Nice streets?? Ever try riding on wet cobblestones with 3/4-inch
    tires?

    Steve McDonald

  5. "Ken M" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I just saw this awful pile up! Must have been like 15 or 20 riders. It
    was in a wet corner. Lance managed to avoid getting caught in it.

    But something else I have noticed, they have REALLY nice streets to
    ride in over there! Now I am sure it is because they are in the
    spotlight. But still! They look far nicer than the streets I get to
    ride on!

    The French can maintain their roads due to the fact they aren't
    spending billions of dollars a month dropping bombs on
    bad people out in the desert.

  6. Mike Jacoubowsky said:
    Quoted message said:

    I just saw this awful pile up! Must have been like 15 or 20 riders. It
    was in a wet corner. Lance managed to avoid getting caught in it.

    That's why you don't apply your brakes *in* a wet corner.

    Probably dumb question of the day, but I didn't understand this when I
    heard it on OLN. How does applying your brakes cause you to skid?

  7. No the french like terrorists! They even do business with them!

    Ken

  8. At 8 Jul 2005 03:46:55 -0700, message
    <[email hidden]> was posted by
    "Ken M" <[email hidden]>, including some, all or none of the
    following:

    Quoted message said:

    No the french like terrorists! They even do business with them!

    Hey, you see? US values are rubbing off after all :-D

    Guy
    --
    May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
    http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

    85% of helmet statistics are made up, 69% of them at CHS, Puget Sound

  9. ?huh? If you are refering to the U.S. and it's past relations with
    terrorists, I will give you that much. But this president will never
    make deals with them. He just bombs the heck out of them!

    Ken

  10. At 8 Jul 2005 03:57:04 -0700, message
    <[email hidden]> was posted by
    "Ken M" <[email hidden]>, including some, all or none of the
    following:

    Quoted message said:

    ?huh? If you are refering to the U.S. and it's past relations with
    terrorists, I will give you that much. But this president will never
    make deals with them. He just bombs the heck out of them!

    I think you'll find that depends on your definition of terrorist - as
    it always did...

    Guy
    --
    May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
    http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

    85% of helmet statistics are made up, 69% of them at CHS, Puget Sound

  11. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Mike Jacoubowsky said:
    Quoted message said:

    I just saw this awful pile up! Must have been like 15 or 20 riders. It
    was in a wet corner. Lance managed to avoid getting caught in it.

    That's why you don't apply your brakes *in* a wet corner.

    Probably dumb question of the day, but I didn't understand this when I
    heard it on OLN. How does applying your brakes cause you to skid?

    This may not be the best explanation, but here goes:

    There is only so much traction available at any given moment. Less when the
    road is wet. If 90% of the traction is being used to negotiate the turn,
    then you only have 10% remaining for braking. Asking the brakes to give you
    any more than that will result in the tire slipping. Once it slips, it's
    very hard to recover. Even if you have the reflexes to respond, a tire
    that's skidding has even less traction than it did a moment before.

    -Don

  12. D DEMAIR said:

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Mike Jacoubowsky said:

    > I just saw this awful pile up! Must have been like 15 or 20
    > riders. It was in a wet corner. Lance managed to avoid getting
    > caught in it.

    That's why you don't apply your brakes *in* a wet corner.

    Probably dumb question of the day, but I didn't understand this when
    I heard it on OLN. How does applying your brakes cause you to skid?

    This may not be the best explanation, but here goes:

    There is only so much traction available at any given moment. Less
    when the road is wet. If 90% of the traction is being used to
    negotiate the turn, then you only have 10% remaining for braking. Asking
    the brakes to give you any more than that will result in the
    tire slipping. Once it slips, it's very hard to recover. Even if
    you have the reflexes to respond, a tire that's skidding has even
    less traction than it did a moment before.

    Inertia. The bike/body is tracking around a corner. Hit the brakes (esp.
    front), and the wheels slow /much/ faster than the frame and rider. Do
    nothing and fall to outside; try to correct and tire(s) slide out.

    Unlike most things, it's worse when wet (no idea what that means)... BS

  13. C.J.Patten said:

    Yes. Don't.

    "Steve McDonald" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Nice streets?? Ever try riding on wet cobblestones with 3/4-inch
    tires?

    Steve McDonald


    And you guys wonder why I prefer mountain bikes with 1.75" tires.
    Bill Baka

  14. Just zis Guy said:

    At 8 Jul 2005 03:57:04 -0700, message
    <[email hidden]> was posted by
    "Ken M" <[email hidden]>, including some, all or none of the
    following:

    Quoted message said:

    ?huh? If you are refering to the U.S. and it's past relations with
    terrorists, I will give you that much. But this president will never
    make deals with them. He just bombs the heck out of them!

    I think you'll find that depends on your definition of terrorist - as
    it always did...

    Guy

    Way off topic, but do you know how much even one bomb costs these days? More
    than some of us make in a year. A cruise missile is about a million and
    those smart bombs have almost as much electronics as TNT. Dimwits, err,
    excuse me, Bush's war is way past the 86 Billion dollar point he told
    congress. Now my grandkids will be paying the bill and we still have crappy
    streets with no bike lanes.
    Bill Baka

  15. Bill said:

    Way off topic, but do you know how much even one bomb costs these days? More
    than some of us make in a year. A cruise missile is about a million and
    those smart bombs have almost as much electronics as TNT. Dimwits, err,
    excuse me, Bush's war is way past the 86 Billion dollar point he told
    congress. Now my grandkids will be paying the bill and we still have crappy
    streets with no bike lanes.
    Bill Baka

    I didn't think you could stay away. Heh.

    Of course, you're still on the wrong side of the (political) street.
    ;-)

    BTW, those bombs you're complaining about saved tens of thousands of
    civilian lives (go back to newsreels of London in WWII if you'd like
    to see the alternative). Money well spent, IMHO.

    Mark Hickey
    Habanero Cycles
    http://www.habcycles.com
    Home of the $695 ti frame

  16. Bill <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:
    C.J.Patten said:

    Yes. Don't.

    "Steve McDonald" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Nice streets?? Ever try riding on wet cobblestones with
    3/4-inch
    tires?

    Steve McDonald


    And you guys wonder why I prefer mountain bikes with 1.75" tires.
    Bill Baka

    Hey Bill you are backa

  17. Ken M said:

    I just saw this awful pile up! Must have been like 15 or 20 riders. It
    was in a wet corner. Lance managed to avoid getting caught in it.

    But something else I have noticed, they have REALLY nice streets to
    ride in over there! Now I am sure it is because they are in the
    spotlight. But still! They look far nicer than the streets I get to
    ride on!

    Ken


    Feel about the same as our streets when you hit them though.

  18. At Fri, 08 Jul 2005 18:09:01 -0700, message
    <[email hidden]> was posted by Bill
    <[email hidden]>, including some, all or none of the following:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    ?huh? If you are refering to the U.S. and it's past relations with
    terrorists, I will give you that much. But this president will never
    make deals with them. He just bombs the heck out of them!

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I think you'll find that depends on your definition of terrorist - as
    it always did...

    Quoted message said:

    Way off topic, but do you know how much even one bomb costs these days?

    Yes, about $5. A bag of fertiliser and a gallon of diesel.

    Guy
    --
    May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
    http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

    85% of helmet statistics are made up, 69% of them at CHS, Puget Sound

  19. At Fri, 08 Jul 2005 19:58:17 -0700, message
    <[email hidden]> was posted by Mark Hickey
    <[email hidden]>, including some, all or none of the following:

    Quoted message said:

    those bombs you're complaining about saved tens of thousands of
    civilian lives

    Up to a point, Lord Copper. They also took rather a lot, and your
    statement assumes that the Wa was necessary and right (which is itself
    contentious, given that every reason advanced beforehand turned out to
    be bogus).

    Guy
    --
    May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
    http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

    85% of helmet statistics are made up, 69% of them at CHS, Puget Sound

  20. you know? said:

    At Fri, 08 Jul 2005 19:58:17 -0700, message
    <[email hidden]> was posted by Mark Hickey
    <[email hidden]>, including some, all or none of the following:

    Quoted message said:

    those bombs you're complaining about saved tens of thousands of
    civilian lives

    Up to a point, Lord Copper. They also took rather a lot, and your
    statement assumes that the Wa was necessary and right (which is itself
    contentious, given that every reason advanced beforehand turned out to
    be bogus).

    Any war is wrong unless the politcians are the first to die.

    Quoted message said:


    Guy

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.