Philly sucks

On Sun, 12 Jun 2005 00:32:10 -0700, "Sierraman" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

It's not me that's insincere, I can't force people at gunpoint to talk about
women's cycling.

So he/we isn't/aren't supposed to judge you by what you say on rbr
because away from rbr you are a more complete person, but you are free
to judge everyone else based on what they post on rbr.

OK, lower on the insincere meter and higher on the hypocrisy.

Curtis L. Russell
Odenton, MD (USA)
Just someone on two wheels...

"Kyle Legate" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Sierraman said:

"ronaldo_jeremiah" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

I apologize for insinuating that Jeff Jones might be on crack. Clearly
Bruce is the resident crack smoker in rbr.

-RJ

BTW dirtbag,

I just love it how you rendered your whole arguement about civility
irrelevant with just one word. Your moral posturing adds to the absurdity.

Maybe we should all follow you to the euro groups to continue the laugh,
whaddaya say?

Mark these guys and avoid them. Here is another one of the biggest jerks in
this group right here, KL.

"Curtis L. Russell" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Sun, 12 Jun 2005 00:32:10 -0700, "Sierraman" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

It's not me that's insincere, I can't force people at gunpoint to talk

about

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

women's cycling.

So he/we isn't/aren't supposed to judge you by what you say on rbr
because away from rbr you are a more complete person, but you are free
to judge everyone else based on what they post on rbr.

OK, lower on the insincere meter and higher on the hypocrisy.

Curtis L. Russell
Odenton, MD (USA)
Just someone on two wheels...

No, because I don't make a habit out of attacking others on rbr. A lot of
these guys get their kicks by their relentless attacks against others on
rbr. These are the dirtbags who have no interest then anything else except
to cause trouble and wreck threads.

"Kyle Legate" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Sierraman said:

"Robert Chung" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

You're whining.

Some of you guys need to move on and allow new blood to run the group.

You

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

guys can't stay in here forever. As far as I know only Kunich can do

that. A

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

lot of you guys are getting older and it's just not very respectable to

talk

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

the talk when you are way beyond your racing years. I don't know how old
Davy was but he is gone as are many, many others. It's time move on.

Thank you for your valueless judgement. Now it's time to follow your own
advice. Buh bye.

I don't think many value your judgements.

Today should be the day, good day to move on.

"John Forrest Tomlinson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Sat, 11 Jun 2005 21:04:44 -0700, "Sierraman" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

"Me" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On 6/11/05 8:30 PM, in article [email hidden],

"Sierraman"

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

<[email hidden]> wrote:

>
> "Me" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
> news:[email hidden]...
>> On 6/11/05 11:32 AM, in article [email hidden],
> "Sierraman"
>> <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "h squared" <[email hidden]> wrote in

message

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>>> news:[email hidden]...
>>>> Sierraman wrote:
>>>> ----------
>>>>
>>>> if you don't like these people, why are you reading and replying

to

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>>>> their posts when it's so easy to skip over them? i think you just

like

Quoted message said:

>>>> trolling and yelling (and that's what lots of people enjoy doing

on

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>>>> usenet, so don't think i'm coming down on you or singling you out)
>>>>
>>>> heather
>>>> ps, this is a rhetorical question
>>>
>>> Are you still here too. Sheeze, I thought you moved on as well.
>>>
>>> I'll check back in a few years and see how many of these guys are

still

Quoted message said:

>>> feeding their habit. Yes that's right, I've been venting some, so

what,

Quoted message said:

>>> since I don't hang here much anymore, I will have my say in this

thread.

Quoted message said:

>>>
>>> Let's move on.
>>>
>>> Bye, bye.
>>>
>>> B-
>>>
>>>
>>
>> http://www.rpi.edu/~markhn/sounds/getout.wav
>
> That was bye, bye, to Heather. I will leave when this thread is over,

not a

Quoted message said:

> minute sooner.
>
>
>

It will be over as soon as you stop whining.............

That's deep. At least everyone knows who I am, unlike you who hides

behind a

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

fake handle. You are the only one in this thread I don't know because you
hide behind a fake handle. Talkin to strangers, so that makes your

request

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

very low on the totem pole.

Step back, take a deep breath, perhaps killfile some people or better
yet, stop reading RBR. If that doesn't work, seek therapy. You're
hurting yoursefl here.

JT

I always thought you were a halfway decent guy although you have ribbed me a
fair bit in the past. I don't see you as a pack runner, more of a stand
alone kind of guy, and that takes more guts. Not running popularity contest
here, I am leaving and I am dam well having my say before I leave, and lots
of it. My therapy is this thread, speaking out against the dirtbags and
leaving this group now.

Bye.

Sierraman said:

I always thought you were a halfway decent guy although you have ribbed me a
fair bit in the past. I don't see you as a pack runner, more of a stand
alone kind of guy, and that takes more guts. Not running popularity contest
here, I am leaving and I am dam well having my say before I leave, and lots
of it. My therapy is this thread, speaking out against the dirtbags and
leaving this group now.

Jesus, what a whiner.

"Kyle Legate" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Jesus, what a whiner.

You are the one who posted that disgusting link of gay guys having sex.
Avoid this guy at all costs. He is one of the biggest troublemakers in this
group and a pervert to boot.

Sierraman said:

"Kyle Legate" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Jesus, what a whiner.

You are the one who posted that disgusting link of gay guys having sex.
Avoid this guy at all costs. He is one of the biggest troublemakers in this
group and a pervert to boot.

Refresh my memory, when did I do that? You seem to have a better memory
for the gay guys having sex than for the person that posted the alleged
link. While we're at it, what's so disgusting about homosexuals
expressing their love for one another?

You seem to have a lot of time for whining lately. And lying. And for
revising history. If you were to plot a list of the troublemakers of rbr
I wouldn't even be in the top 50. The only people I have flamed
significantly in my years here (which include those Good Ole Days you
seem to miss so much) are Kunich, Pappy and you. Why? Kunich deserves
it. Pappy deserves it. And, like it or not, you deserve it, for the
reasons that Amit has already discussed. And because you're a tool.

Have a nice day.

Sierraman,

Legate is someone I disagree with a lot, but he plays fair and doesn't
whine. Could you please just shut up your whining. It's tedious and
embarrassing.

JT

****************************
Remove "remove" to reply
Visit http://www.jt10000.com
****************************

"Sierraman" <[email hidden]> wrote in
news:[email hidden]:

Quoted message said:

Actually I left several months ago but never said anything. I posted
looking for a Philly video on the fly, and made the mistake of posting
about Queen Tut.

No, your mistake was looking for a video of the women's race in Philly. I saw
it live, and what a piece of [censored] it was. The selection was made the first
time up the wall, and after that they just rode around waiting for the bunch
sprint. Why anyone allready knowing the result would want to watch it is
beyond me.

"Sierraman" <[email hidden]> wrote in news:PIWdncJSzpXdWTbfRVn-
[email hidden]:

Quoted message said:

Again, that's deep fake handle. I don't have many words for strangers who
like to hide their antics behind a fake name.

[censored],
That's funny coming from a guy named "Sierraman."

Sierraman said:

What exists today are mostly a pack of rebels who are keen on keeping
women's cycling dead and out of rbr,

get real you moron.

just because rbr isn't your platonic ideal of a cycling newsgroup
doesn't mean there's "a pack of rebels who are keen on keeping women's
cycling dead and out of rbr".

Dude -

Get a grip.

-RJ

Sierraman said:

"amit" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Sierraman said:

What exists today are mostly a pack of rebels who are keen on keeping
women's cycling dead and out of rbr,

get real you moron.

just because rbr isn't your platonic ideal of a cycling newsgroup
doesn't mean there's "a pack of rebels who are keen on keeping women's
cycling dead and out of rbr".

Yes it does, subtle at times but steady and unrelenting. It only takes a few
that try to control a group with their gauntlets. Heck, Henry did it for
almost a year, hammering every newbie that entered. The same can be said for
a few who destroyed the Redlands thread. How does a thread about Redlands
have 300 replies and not one single response about Redlands. I don't have to
create a vision of rbr, as the former years in the mid-90's seem fair enough
to me. Sadly those guys and gals more then likely left for the same reasons.

I read quite a bit of that stuff by those questioning why the group was
talking about women's racing, as if the group was hijacked. I have always
wondered if it would be better to have two newsgroups, one for womens
racing, one for mens. I think if CN was split into half, men and women, it
would be much easier to find races and access much more quickly everything
about women's racing instead of trying to sort them out from the list. For
instance, last year CN carried the Bira, this year they didn't at least last
I checked, I couldn't find it. At least some of the less known Euro races
would be easier for anyone to access in a ladies section, if the site was
divided up. That would make it easier to access all of the women's content
much more quickly. Especially women who are new or those who are not familar
with Euro events could access in plain view much more easily races like the
Bira instead of being hidden somewhere in the men's listing. Bira had some
great riders in it this year. I think their search engine could be a little
better and if both men and women races, riders, data and journals and
interviews could be searched seperately and also split in half between the
mens and womens section. That doesn't mean the site would have to take on
the look of two tone ice cream bar, at least not by just looking at it. I
like CN simple yet efficent design, but I am afraid splitting the archives
as well would be a royal pain.

http://www.fortunecity.com/lavender/loxwood/38/[censored].wav

Sierraman said:

"amit" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Sierraman said:

What exists today are mostly a pack of rebels who are keen on keeping
women's cycling dead and out of rbr,

get real you moron.

just because rbr isn't your platonic ideal of a cycling newsgroup
doesn't mean there's "a pack of rebels who are keen on keeping women's
cycling dead and out of rbr".

Yes it does, subtle at times but steady and unrelenting. It only takes a few
that try to control a group with their gauntlets. Heck, Henry did it for
almost a year, hammering every newbie that entered. The same can be said for
a few who destroyed the Redlands thread. How does a thread about Redlands
have 300 replies and not one single response about Redlands. I don't have to
create a vision of rbr, as the former years in the mid-90's seem fair enough
to me. Sadly those guys and gals more then likely left for the same reasons.

I read quite a bit of that stuff by those questioning why the group was
talking about women's racing, as if the group was hijacked.

http://www.fortunecity.com/lavender/loxwood/38/girlshav.wav

Quoted message said:

I have always
wondered if it would be better to have two newsgroups, one for womens
racing, one for mens. I think if CN was split into half, men and women, it
would be much easier to find races and access much more quickly everything
about women's racing instead of trying to sort them out from the list. For
instance, last year CN carried the Bira, this year they didn't at least last
I checked, I couldn't find it. At least some of the less known Euro races
would be easier for anyone to access in a ladies section, if the site was
divided up. That would make it easier to access all of the women's content
much more quickly. Especially women who are new or those who are not familar
with Euro events could access in plain view much more easily races like the
Bira instead of being hidden somewhere in the men's listing. Bira had some
great riders in it this year. I think their search engine could be a little
better and if both men and women races, riders, data and journals and
interviews could be searched seperately and also split in half between the
mens and womens section. That doesn't mean the site would have to take on
the look of two tone ice cream bar, at least not by just looking at it. I
like CN simple yet efficent design, but I am afraid splitting the archives
as well would be a royal pain.

"amit" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Sierraman said:

What exists today are mostly a pack of rebels who are keen on keeping
women's cycling dead and out of rbr,

get real you moron.

just because rbr isn't your platonic ideal of a cycling newsgroup
doesn't mean there's "a pack of rebels who are keen on keeping women's
cycling dead and out of rbr".

Yes it does, subtle at times but steady and unrelenting. It only takes a few
that try to control a group with their gauntlets. Heck, Henry did it for
almost a year, hammering every newbie that entered. The same can be said for
a few who destroyed the Redlands thread. How does a thread about Redlands
have 300 replies and not one single response about Redlands. I don't have to
create a vision of rbr, as the former years in the mid-90's seem fair enough
to me. Sadly those guys and gals more then likely left for the same reasons.

I read quite a bit of that stuff by those questioning why the group was
talking about women's racing, as if the group was hijacked. I have always
wondered if it would be better to have two newsgroups, one for womens
racing, one for mens. I think if CN was split into half, men and women, it
would be much easier to find races and access much more quickly everything
about women's racing instead of trying to sort them out from the list. For
instance, last year CN carried the Bira, this year they didn't at least last
I checked, I couldn't find it. At least some of the less known Euro races
would be easier for anyone to access in a ladies section, if the site was
divided up. That would make it easier to access all of the women's content
much more quickly. Especially women who are new or those who are not familar
with Euro events could access in plain view much more easily races like the
Bira instead of being hidden somewhere in the men's listing. Bira had some
great riders in it this year. I think their search engine could be a little
better and if both men and women races, riders, data and journals and
interviews could be searched seperately and also split in half between the
mens and womens section. That doesn't mean the site would have to take on
the look of two tone ice cream bar, at least not by just looking at it. I
like CN simple yet efficent design, but I am afraid splitting the archives
as well would be a royal pain.

"Kyle Legate" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Refresh my memory, when did I do that?

Kyle Legate Jun 11 2003, 10:31 am show options

Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.racing
From: "Kyle Legate" <[email hidden]> - Find messages by this author
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 10:16:08 -0400
Local: Wed,Jun 11 2003 10:16 am
Subject: Re: Looking for photo of Annette Neumann
Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original |
Report Abuse

Too sexy? I don't think you posted the right photo. I'll trade you a
www.goatse.cx for that one.

--------------------------------
There is (no) excuse for this in a cycling forum. It is not only disgusting
and sick, but really speaks to your character. The whole two years I have
been here, this is the only time I can remember anyone posting such a sick
and disgusting link. (You) are the only one I can ever remember doing this.

You seem to have a better memory

Quoted message said:

for the gay guys having sex than for the person that posted the alleged
link. While we're at it, what's so disgusting about homosexuals
expressing their love for one another?

I have a memory for being shocked by something I certainly didn't want to
and expect to see in a cycling forum. Now it's odd that you are posting
about the Gay games? Why are you bringing that up? As for you last question,
why do millions of average people have a problem with it?

Quoted message said:

You seem to have a lot of time for whining lately. And lying.

Lying? Take a look, see above?

And for

Quoted message said:

revising history. If you were to plot a list of the troublemakers of rbr
I wouldn't even be in the top 50.

Probably less then 20 in the whole group, and less then 10 for the grevious
ones.

The only people I have flamed

Quoted message said:

significantly in my years here (which include those Good Ole Days you
seem to miss so much) are Kunich, Pappy and you. Why? Kunich deserves
it. Pappy deserves it.

Why does Pappy deserve it?

And, like it or not, you deserve it, for the

Quoted message said:

reasons that Amit has already discussed. And because you're a tool.

Tool, another abused word, it's an aversion word that really doesn't address
much.

"John Forrest Tomlinson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Sierraman,

Legate is someone I disagree with a lot, but he plays fair

He does?

Kyle Legate Jun 11 2003, 10:31 am show options

Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.racing
From: "Kyle Legate" <[email hidden]> - Find messages by this author
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 10:16:08 -0400
Local: Wed,Jun 11 2003 10:16 am
Subject: Re: Looking for photo of Annette Neumann
Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original |
Report Abuse

Too sexy? I don't think you posted the right photo. I'll trade you a
www.goatse.cx for that one.

"Mozilla Gorilla" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"Sierraman" <[email hidden]> wrote in news:PIWdncJSzpXdWTbfRVn-
[email hidden]:

Quoted message said:

Again, that's deep fake handle. I don't have many words for strangers

who

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

like to hide their antics behind a fake name.

[censored],
That's funny coming from a guy named "Sierraman."

Your are not Palochick either I doubt, everyone knows who I am.

Sierraman said:

"John Forrest Tomlinson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Sierraman,

Legate is someone I disagree with a lot, but he plays fair

He does?

Kyle Legate Jun 11 2003, 10:31 am show options

Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.racing
From: "Kyle Legate" <[email hidden]> - Find messages by this author
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 10:16:08 -0400
Local: Wed,Jun 11 2003 10:16 am
Subject: Re: Looking for photo of Annette Neumann
Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original |
Report Abuse

Too sexy? I don't think you posted the right photo. I'll trade you a
www.goatse.cx for that one.

http://goat.cx/