Larry Weisenthal <[email hidden]> wrote:
: The split was 1:46.60. According to the TV announcers, swum 20 minutes after his gold medal 200
: fly, which was just off the WR he'd set in the semi-finals the previous day.
: Considering that, as a flyer/IMer, Phelps obviously trains much less freestyle than Hackett (whom
: he outswam on the relay lead-off) and Thorpe, and considering the lack of rest, I think that
: Phelps made a statement that he has the clear potential to be the greatest swimmer not only of our
: time, but of all time.
Perhaps for some this might be so. Of course, when we are talking about something as subjective as
"greatest of all time" there is a lot of scope for differing opinions. For instance, when I think
greatest swimmer of all time, I naturally think freestyle. I no more think the greatest
fly/back/breaststroker to be the greatest *swimmer* than I do the greatest doggy paddler/walking on
the bottom of the pooler/underwater summersalter. I should reiterate that this is simply my opinion
and that when I do think of "greatest of all time" I think of swimming in terms of physical ability.
Granted, if I were to think of swimming in its sport context I might also conclude that Phelps does
have potential to be the greatest of all time but this definition has much less interest for me,
than does the "fastest in the water over a certain distance" flavour.
That said I think Thorpe with 200,400,800 and who knows.. one day maybe 100 and heck while I'm
throwing around maybes, the 1500, gets the nod.
That said, I fully concede your opinion is as equally valid (and useless) as is my own in regarding
the "greatest of all time" debate.
Matt