Recumbent bicycles · Public discussion

Phantom vs P38

Started by Don · · Last activity · 25 posts · 4,517 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Recumbent bicycles
Published
1 March 2003
Last activity
16 May 2003
Original author
Don
Posts
25
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
4,517
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–25 of 25
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Cletus, I do not understand what you were trying to say there about the less than 2 inches.

    I hear you on the 16" wheel. My Haluzak Leprechaun Hybrid Race is the same 349/559 configuration as
    the small (and medium?) P-38. It makes me wonder how much improvement I can expect. I would love the
    406/700c upgrade configuration except that I would probably fall down a lot (like every time I
    stopped--if I could even get started in the first place)

    Cletus D. Lee <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    .

    Quoted message said:


    I just measured my boom. I have the Med and the boom is fully extended. If it were at the min
    mark, you would only get a little less than 2"

  2. In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    Cletus, I do not understand what you were trying to say there about the less than 2 inches.


    Sorry I was not clearer. Let me try this way:

    I have an X-seam of 41"-42". I could not fit comfortably on a Large P-38, so I opted for the Medium
    with a 16" suspension fork. (as it turned out, the 16"fork w/ suspension was about he same height as
    a 20" non suspension fork).

    The seat to pedal distance is adjusted by moving the Boom in or out. I have my boom at the maximum
    point of extension. The minimum length would be where the Boom sleeve would contact the derailleur
    post. I measured that distance on my bike and found it to be less than 2" Shorter cranks would give
    an additional 10mm (or 1/2"😉 If you take the maximum extension on the boom as fitting a and and move
    the boom to the min. point and install shorter cranks, I do not see a Medium P-38 fitting any one
    with an X-seam of less than 38.5".

    --

    Cletus D. Lee Bacchetta Giro Lightning Voyager clee.orgclee.org
    - Bellaire, TX USA -

  3. Thanks Big Dog, Now I understand. I think the Lightning e-mail response to my question claimed 37.5"
    as the minimum X-seam for the medium. Would cutting the boom help or is there some interference by
    the braces or something the limits that? Shorter cranks certainly only make the problem worse by
    requiring the boom to be pulled farther back.

    Cletus Lee <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    If you take the maximum extension on the

    Quoted message said:

    boom as fitting a and and move the boom to the min. point and install shorter cranks, I do not see
    a Medium P-38 fitting any one with an X-seam of less than 38.5".

  4. In article <[email hidden]>, dizone1 @lycos.com says...

    Quoted message said:

    Would cutting the boom help or is there some interference by the braces or something the
    limits that?


    There is a Brace under the boom sleeve that prevents making the boom Shorter.

    --
    Cletus D. Lee Bacchetta Giro Lightning Voyager clee.orgclee.org
    - Bellaire, TX USA -

  5. Don,

    I am in the Santa Cruz area and own a small Phantom. I don' t know if you have made a purchase yet, but you are more than welcome to try out my Phantom if you like and are vaguely in the area.

    -joycily

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.