this time by vino and knaven ! cipo 12th ?!? well not really, since knaven was probably paid a nice sum to win the race due to his exploits in the TDF. that is unless petacchi's top sprint speed is decelerating faster than that of a rbr masters fattie, highly unlikely.
they were detached, in the regular way. the repetivity in these crit scenarios is educating ha. Cipo didn't wear a helmet. He humbly said before the start he wasn't quite ready. He also said he had boycotted the Tour , RBR-style (not watching, that is)
the belgians are too busy downing fritters and the dutchies are too busy downing amstel gold, like they have time to notice the races are fixed.
shawn
"Bart" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
they were detached, in the regular way. the repetivity in these crit scenarios is educating ha. Cipo didn't wear a helmet. He humbly said before the start he wasn't quite ready. He also said he had boycotted the Tour , RBR-style (not watching, that is)
"Nick Burns" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:
"Bart" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
they were detached, in the regular way. the repetivity in these crit scenarios is educating ha. Cipo didn't wear a helmet.
Which means what, a fine? I sort of assumed that a helmet-less rider would not be allowed to start.
The UCI has almost nothing to say about crits. Especially things like these post-Tour crits are not regulated by the UCI. Of course whoever oversees them has their own rules.