Road Cycling · Public discussion

petacchi beaten again ?

Started by Swj · · Last activity · 6 posts · 526 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
31 July 2003
Last activity
1 August 2003
Original author
Swj
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
526
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. cyclingnews.comroad.php

    this time by vino and knaven ! cipo 12th ?!? well not really, since knaven was probably paid a nice
    sum to win the race due to his exploits in the TDF. that is unless petacchi's top sprint speed is
    decelerating faster than that of a rbr masters fattie, highly unlikely.

    shawn

    ps: i'm still here.

  2. they were detached, in the regular way. the repetivity in these crit scenarios is educating ha. Cipo
    didn't wear a helmet. He humbly said before the start he wasn't quite ready. He also said he had
    boycotted the Tour , RBR-style (not watching, that is)

  3. "Bart" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    they were detached, in the regular way. the repetivity in these crit scenarios is educating ha.
    Cipo didn't wear a helmet.

    Which means what, a fine? I sort of assumed that a helmet-less rider would not be allowed to start.

    He humbly said before the start he wasn't quite

    Quoted message said:

    ready. He also said he had boycotted the Tour , RBR-style (not watching, that is)

  4. the belgians are too busy downing fritters and the dutchies are too busy downing amstel gold, like
    they have time to notice the races are fixed.

    shawn

    "Bart" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    they were detached, in the regular way. the repetivity in these crit scenarios is educating ha.
    Cipo didn't wear a helmet. He humbly said before the start he wasn't quite ready. He also said he
    had boycotted the Tour , RBR-style (not watching, that is)

  5. "Nick Burns" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    "Bart" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    they were detached, in the regular way. the repetivity in these crit scenarios is educating ha.
    Cipo didn't wear a helmet.

    Which means what, a fine? I sort of assumed that a helmet-less rider would not be allowed
    to start.

    You think these are UCI sanctioned events? Ha! I hear the unwary can even place bets at some of
    these crits. :-)

    Quoted message said:

    He humbly said before the start he wasn't quite

    Quoted message said:

    ready. He also said he had boycotted the Tour , RBR-style (not watching, that is)

  6. "Nick Burns" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    "Bart" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    they were detached, in the regular way. the repetivity in these crit scenarios is educating ha.
    Cipo didn't wear a helmet.

    Which means what, a fine? I sort of assumed that a helmet-less rider would not be allowed
    to start.

    The UCI has almost nothing to say about crits. Especially things like these post-Tour crits are not
    regulated by the UCI. Of course whoever oversees them has their own rules.

    -Amit

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.