Doug Freese said:
"Harold Buck" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:In article <[email hidden]>,
Quoted message said:There have been some suggestions that, for economic and security
reasons, a permanent Olympics site be established.
One of the dumbest ideas of all time.
Well dumb is a little strong. 😉 The host site can make a bunch of
money or at least build a site that will last forever. If it's a
permanent site does all the money go to the host site? Now that's the
way for a single place to make a boatload of money. If some could figure
out the profit and divide it to everyones satisfaction then maybe.
Without a lot of questions answered I think it is a [censored] poor idea. Not
quite dumb. 🙂
-Doug
Aw c'mon guys. Can't you think farther outside the box than that?
Imagine if the permanent host wasn't a "host city" or some already-known
place, but instead some special place created explicitly for the Olympics.
Imagine an island somewhere over which no nation had sovereignty.
Essentially an independent city-state named Olympia (similar to the Vatican
city-state). This island is covered with well-designed, no compromise,
permanent venues where the world's athletes gather every four years to
compete (and probably gather in between Olympics to train).
A idealistic dream? Hell yes. But this is essentially the setup that
brought us ancient Athens Greece in the first place.
(Of course, I'm dreaming, but I'm an architect - I get paid for this stuff -
give me some slack)
;-)
John