UK and Europe · Public discussion

perfunctory mudguards

Started by Geraint Jones · · Last activity · 24 posts · 893 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
9 August 2005
Last activity
10 August 2005
Original author
Geraint Jones
Posts
24
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
893
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–24 of 24
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Simon Brooke said:

    I thought the chief point of requiring mudguards on some audaxes was
    to keep /other/ /riders/ relatively clean and dry. That being the
    case, mudguards which didn't do that well should clearly not be
    approved.

    Nah. If someone dislikes being sprayed with muck (I personally don't mind --
    it's all part of the fun[1]), he shouldn't be riding so close behind. IME,
    even full length mudguards don't trap most of the flying crud anyhow; they
    just keep it off the rider and his bike. Guards with rear flaps are the way
    to go if you want to keep crud off your fellow riders.

    The reason for the muguard stipulation is so they don't have mucky riders
    all over the furniture in the controls.

    Like others, I've been on a summer audaxes without mudguards where they've
    been stiplulated. If it happens to rain, I keep out of groups of riders I
    don't know (some of whom might object) and stay standing at the controls.

    [1] in summer

  2. Simonb said:

    Like others, I've been on a summer audaxes without mudguards where they've
    been stipulated.

    that's interesting; are there still that many? can't say I notice much
    as tend to read the mudguard rule after entering and choose the bike
    accordingly, plus of course the weather on the day.

  3. MartinM said:
    Simonb said:

    Like others, I've been on a summer audaxes without mudguards where
    they've been stipulated.

    that's interesting; are there still that many? can't say I notice much
    as tend to read the mudguard rule after entering and choose the bike
    accordingly, plus of course the weather on the day.

    West Bay and Back was the last 'M' I did. There was absolutely no chance of
    rain that day, so I didn't bother with the Raceblades. The D*rs*t C**st is
    another. My bother rode the latter with me this year, he's new to Audaxing
    and looked at me aghast when I told him about the mduguard rule (he didn't
    have any fitted and feared the Spanish Inquisition).

  4. Simonb said:
    MartinM said:
    Simonb said:

    Like others, I've been on a summer audaxes without mudguards where
    they've been stipulated.

    that's interesting; are there still that many? can't say I notice much
    as tend to read the mudguard rule after entering and choose the bike
    accordingly, plus of course the weather on the day.

    West Bay and Back was the last 'M' I did. There was absolutely no chance of
    rain that day, so I didn't bother with the Raceblades. The D*rs*t C**st is
    another.

    D*rs*t C**st is on my list for next year; I have a secret weapon ;-)

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.