Australia and New Zealand · Public discussion

pedestrians and cyclists

Started by Tamyka Bell · · Last activity · 86 posts · 4,103 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Australia and New Zealand
Published
15 October 2004
Last activity
29 November 2004
Original author
Tamyka Bell
Posts
86
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
4,103
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 86
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I have given myself two days to calm down about this, but now I have to
    say it.

    Now, I hate dumb pedestrians as much as the next cyclist (note, "dumb"
    not "all" or even "ignorant" pedestrians) but what is with that hurry
    seen in the Coro Drive bike path users? Yep, peak hour, it's slow,
    pedestrians get in the way. Deal with it. You know you won't be able to
    stay at 30km/h the whole trip. Don't pretend otherwise.

    Don't duck through little itsy bitsy gaps. If a cyclist is sitting out
    from the edge a bit, don't immediately complain as you pass them, maybe
    they were trying to avoid the glass. If I'm overtaking a pedestrian so
    that my lane is temporarily blocked, and you're approaching from the
    opposite direction, it's probably smart to not cross to my side of the
    path. If I slow down until it's safe to pass a pedestrian, and I'm
    holding you up, TOO F'ING BAD!

    People who take risks like that are giving cyclists a bad name and
    putting us all in danger. If you nearly take someone out at high speed
    because they were walking too slow and blocking you, do you think
    they'll be patient next time they see a cyclist on the road? Do you
    think they'll make a conscious effort to give way? Doubt it.

    T

    not happy,

    also not hippy

  2. Another one I hate is when there's a specially built shared cycle / walking path built away from the road to provide a safer alternative for bikes and people. Pedestrians always seem to walk side by side with a dog or two on a lead and pretend not to hear / see you coming up behind them. They just expect you to go around them onto the grass often where there are cat head burrs that puncture your tyre in seconds. You'd think pedestrians could show a bit of consideration and 'share' the path rather than see how much of it they can take up and how far they can make a cyclist ride around them.

  3. Well said Tamyka. Too true. The same goes for cyclists who run red lights. I cannot control my sheer frustration when I see this and often scream at people who do this.

    I got told the other day to "get a bell". All I did was ask a bunch of pedestrians, walking 6 abreast in the city Botanical Gardens, if I could please get through. Just a simple question, asked nicely. Anyway, considering all 6 of them were overweight females with plenty of flesh (read: stretch marks, celliulite, bellybutton that would fit a watermelon) on show, I figured it must have been a huge energy expenditure for them to move 2 steps across.

  4. My theory is that people generally do not walk around very often anymore & therefore lose the cognitive skills of being aware of what’s about them when they do go for a walk.

    Watching old b/w movies from the turn of the century you see people look this way & that because horse-drawn vehicles didn’t stop as fast etc – pedestrians had no choice really.
    My other theory is that pedestrians see anything outside of a roadway as their own, therefore cyclists have to “go around”.
    In my time riding around I’ve come to the conclusion that up against any other path user, I come out as the 2nd class citizen (therefore I take to the grass etc).

  5. "Lotte" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:


    Well said Tamyka. Too true. The same goes for cyclists who run red
    lights. I cannot control my sheer frustration when I see this and
    often scream at people who do this.

    See my rant in the "sooky lala" thread..

    Quoted message said:

    I got told the other day to "get a bell". All I did was ask a bunch of
    pedestrians, walking 6 abreast in the city Botanical Gardens, if I could
    please get through. Just a simple question, asked nicely. Anyway,
    considering all 6 of them were overweight females with plenty of flesh
    (read: stretch marks, celliulite, bellybutton that would fit a
    watermelon) on show, I figured it must have been a huge energy
    expenditure for them to move 2 steps across.

    hehe... ;-)
    I'm sticking with my "avoid bike paths at all costs" method.

    hippy

  6. Marx SS said:

    My theory is that people generally do not walk around very often anymore
    & therefore lose the cognitive skills of being aware of what’s about
    them when they do go for a walk.

    My solution: bolt a trailer bike to the back, put a four year old on it,
    and arm them with a horn that honks loudly. I guarantee everyone on the
    path will know you're there.

    DaveB "in need of earplugs for the next family ride"

  7. "Marx SS" <[email hidden]

    Quoted message said:

    In my time riding around I've come to the conclusion that up against
    any other path user, I come out as the 2nd class citizen (therefore I
    take to the grass etc).

    We are second-class citizens.. in their minds. I try to
    reduce possible conflict by slowing, riding around, etc.
    Just think of all the benefits you can get from not just
    maintaining 30kph all the way home..
    - braking
    - standing starts
    - sprintervals
    - trackstand practise
    - use the breaks in flow to try wheelies :-)
    - take your road bike off-road - they still work ya know!

    hippy
    - positivity in usenet may not reflect reality ;-)

  8. hippy said:

    [snip]

    hehe... ;-)
    I'm sticking with my "avoid bike paths at all costs" method.

    hippy

    I'll second that - roads are for bikes and bikes are for roads.

    OTOH, I know the bit of path that Tamyka is complaining about. The road that runs parallel is probably even slower for cyclists at peak hour.

    I face a similar problem crossing Darling Harbour on the old Pyrmont Bridge... lots of pedestrians wandering about and no specific bike lane. The bit between the bridge and King St is a section only about 200m long that is only about 4 pedestrians wide. Fortunately, most walking commuters know to keep left - it's the tourists you have to watch.

    Ritch

    My own shared path rule: If you're in front of me, I'll avoid hitting you. If you're behind me, you avoid me!

  9. "hippy" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Marx SS" <[email hidden]

    Quoted message said:

    In my time riding around I've come to the conclusion that up against
    any other path user, I come out as the 2nd class citizen (therefore I
    take to the grass etc).

    We are second-class citizens.. in their minds. I try to
    reduce possible conflict by slowing, riding around, etc.
    Just think of all the benefits you can get from not just
    maintaining 30kph all the way home..
    - braking
    - standing starts
    - sprintervals
    - trackstand practise
    - use the breaks in flow to try wheelies :-)
    - take your road bike off-road - they still work ya know!

    hippy
    - positivity in usenet may not reflect reality ;-)


    I personally like the idea of keeping rolled up printouts of this particular
    thread to stuff down the back of their neck as you go past.

  10. Lotte wrote:
    ....snip.....

    Quoted message said:

    I got told the other day to "get a bell".

    ROFL. Have been told the same, but the problem is that it still doesn't
    fix the problem.

    If you have isolated pedestrians, then a few rings from wide away will
    alert them to your prescence (so long as you are travelling slow) and
    most give you a wide berth/ the complete path.

    The worst is crowded paths when you have to ring the bell close to them.
    I'm thinking of installing a seat on my front rack. The number of times
    I've been on one side of the path ready to slip around the, ring the
    bell and they immediately jump sideways in front of me.

  11. "ritcho" <[email hidden]

    Quoted message said:
    hippy said:

    I'm sticking with my "avoid bike paths at all costs" method.

    I'll second that - roads are for bikes and bikes are for roads.

    OTOH, I know the bit of path that Tamyka is complaining about. The road
    that runs parallel is probably even slower for cyclists at peak hour.

    Depends how good you are at dodging mirrors ;-)

    hippy

  12. "Tamyka Bell" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    hehe... Is there a bullbar for tredlies?

    --
    Alan Erskine
    We can get people to the Moon in five years,
    not the fifteen GWB proposes.
    Give NASA a real challenge
    [email hidden]

  13. Lotte said:


    Well said Tamyka. Too true. The same goes for cyclists who run red
    lights. I cannot control my sheer frustration when I see this and
    often scream at people who do this.

    I got told the other day to "get a bell". All I did was ask a bunch of
    pedestrians, walking 6 abreast in the city Botanical Gardens, if I could
    please get through. Just a simple question, asked nicely. Anyway,
    considering all 6 of them were overweight females with plenty of flesh
    (read: stretch marks, celliulite, bellybutton that would fit a
    watermelon) on show, I figured it must have been a huge energy
    expenditure for them to move 2 steps across.

    --
    Lotte

    Interesting that they would rather you ring a bell at them than politely
    ask them to move. Same day I came up behind a man riding along behind
    his small child (you know, a bit shaky but big enough to remain upright
    on it); I slowed right down and called out "I'm just coming up on your
    right" at which point the man told his son to move left and thanked me
    very much for not just flying past. Hmmm, warm fuzzies, still some nice,
    sensible people out there.

  14. Terry Collins said:

    If you have isolated pedestrians, then a few rings from wide away will
    alert them to your prescence (so long as you are travelling slow) and
    most give you a wide berth/ the complete path.

    The worst is crowded paths when you have to ring the bell close to them.
    I'm thinking of installing a seat on my front rack. The number of times
    I've been on one side of the path ready to slip around the, ring the
    bell and they immediately jump sideways in front of me.

    I had a guy jump right into me on the Yarra path.
    I stopped, he flew.
    Change of momentum thing I 'spose. Hmmm... Pedestrian Croquet, a new sport.

  15. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >> "Marx" == Marx SS <[email hidden]> writes:

    Marx> My theory is that people generally do not walk around very
    Marx> often anymore & therefore lose the cognitive skills of being
    Marx> aware of what’s about them when they do go for a walk.

    You're not wrong.

    I work out of the Australia Post building and the Victorian Police
    Centre, opposite ends of the CBD and a nice 25 minute walk (10 minutes
    by bike <grin>😉. The other day I had to do some work with a colleague
    who operates almost exclusively out of 321. He just about had heart
    failure by the end of our journey. I asked him if he ever walked
    anywhere.

    "From the office to the car park normally, that's about it."

    Fairly typical these days :-(
    --
    Cheers
    Euan

  16. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >> "Tamyka" == Tamyka Bell <[email hidden]> writes:

    Tamyka> I have given myself two days to calm down about this, but
    Tamyka> now I have to say it.

    Tamyka> Now, I hate dumb pedestrians as much as the next cyclist
    Tamyka> (note, "dumb" not "all" or even "ignorant" pedestrians) but
    Tamyka> what is with that hurry seen in the Coro Drive bike path
    Tamyka> users? Yep, peak hour, it's slow, pedestrians get in the
    Tamyka> way. Deal with it. You know you won't be able to stay at
    Tamyka> 30km/h the whole trip. Don't pretend otherwise.

    Quoted message said:

    snip<

    Totally agree with you Tamyka, however IMO pedestrians and cyclists mix
    less well than cars and bicycles. Bicycles are vehicles and belong on
    the road.

    I'd trust my safety to motorists over pedestrians any day.
    --
    Cheers
    Euan

  17. hippy said:

    "Marx SS" <[email hidden]

    Quoted message said:

    In my time riding around I've come to the conclusion that up against
    any other path user, I come out as the 2nd class citizen (therefore I
    take to the grass etc).

    We are second-class citizens.. in their minds. I try to
    reduce possible conflict by slowing, riding around, etc.
    Just think of all the benefits you can get from not just
    maintaining 30kph all the way home..
    - braking
    - standing starts
    - sprintervals
    - trackstand practise
    - use the breaks in flow to try wheelies :-)
    - take your road bike off-road - they still work ya know!

    hippy
    - positivity in usenet may not reflect reality ;-)

    Good ideas. Personally I'm finally making a bit of progress
    with my life's ambition of being able to mono on my roadie 🙂

    --
    Nick

  18. Tamyka Bell wrote:

    ....snip....

    Quoted message said:

    Interesting that they would rather you ring a bell at them than politely
    ask them to move.

    Is this related to nationality?
    In my experience, older people from UK seem to squark about bell, but
    everyone who hears the bell seems to give room. I see it as sort of
    "pedestrian training".

  19. "Marx SS" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message news:[email hidden]

    Quoted message said:

    My theory is that people generally do not walk around very often
    anymore & therefore lose the cognitive skills of being aware of
    what’s about them when they do go for a walk.

    Watching old b/w movies from the turn of the century you see people
    look this way & that because horse-drawn vehicles didn’t stop as fast
    etc – pedestrians had no choice really.

    The law gives pedestrians priority over everyone else. Ergo, pedestrians
    don't need their brains.

    --

    A: Top-posters.
    Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

  20. DRS said:


    The law gives pedestrians priority over everyone else. Ergo, pedestrians
    don't need their brains.

    Does it really? in B+W i mean?
    Surely there must be some form of precedent if its a 'shared' path.
    Wont surprise me if its not, but hey one can dream

    Altho, must admit i seem to avoid most offroad paths these days. the stretch (Anniversary trial?) between East Canterbury Station and Whitehorse rd is just too god to ignore tho...

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.