Pedestrian activity, economic activity

"Honest Aryan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

My fellow racists (Whites only),
I thought my TV freeze-framed when it
showed a street-scene in Havana.
Cuba make even Mexico look busy!

Does that "whites only" include white Cubans?
Are you aware that at least 5% of white Americans aren't white by their own
definition.

Why do you call yourself an "Aryan"? Are you indo-european or indo-iranian,
or just ignorant?

Baba Dadá said:

Does that "whites only" include white Cubans?
Are you aware that at least 5% of white Americans aren't white by their own
definition.

Why do you call yourself an "Aryan"? Are you indo-european or indo-iranian,
or just ignorant?

http://www.wsu.edu:8080/~dee/ANCINDIA/ARYANS.HTM

"This concept of nobility, in fact, seems to lie at the
heart of Indo-European(*) consciousness, for it appears
in another country's name, 'Ireland,' or 'Eire'."

(*)'Indo-European' is PC-speak for Aryan.

--
Visit the Cybermuseum of BBC War Crimes at:
http://users.bluecarrots.com/rbisto/BBC/BBC.html
Admission *FREE* - even for libruls!

"Honest Aryan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Baba Dadá said:

Does that "whites only" include white Cubans?
Are you aware that at least 5% of white Americans aren't white by their

own

Quoted message said:

definition.

Why do you call yourself an "Aryan"? Are you indo-european or

indo-iranian,

Quoted message said:

or just ignorant?

http://www.wsu.edu:8080/~dee/ANCINDIA/ARYANS.HTM

"This concept of nobility, in fact, seems to lie at the
heart of Indo-European(*) consciousness, for it appears
in another country's name, 'Ireland,' or 'Eire'."

(*)'Indo-European' is PC-speak for Aryan.

I'm familiar with all the info in the link you provide for an answer. The
problem is that Aryan and "white" aren't necessarily the same thing.

Baba Dadá said:

I'm familiar with all the info in the link you provide for an answer. The
problem is that Aryan and "white" aren't necessarily the same thing.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,926038,00.html

"Later migrations coincided with the expansion of the Indo-European
languages, including Latin, German, Sanskrit and English. Linguists
have long sought a homeland for the Indo-Europeans. The genetic data
favours an origin on the Russian steppes with a group of nomadic
farmers known as the Kurgan who domesticated the horse and rode out to
invade India and Europe. Studies of Irish Y-chromosomes indicate that
the British Isles represents the western edge of that migration."

--
Visit the Cybermuseum of BBC War Crimes at:
http://users.bluecarrots.com/r bisto/BBC/BBC.html
Admission *FREE* - even for libruls!

below
"Honest Aryan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Baba Dadá said:

I'm familiar with all the info in the link you provide for an answer. The
problem is that Aryan and "white" aren't necessarily the same thing.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,926038,00.html

"Later migrations coincided with the expansion of the Indo-European
languages, including Latin, German, Sanskrit and English. Linguists
have long sought a homeland for the Indo-Europeans. The genetic data
favours an origin on the Russian steppes with a group of nomadic
farmers known as the Kurgan who domesticated the horse and rode out to
invade India and Europe. Studies of Irish Y-chromosomes indicate that
the British Isles represents the western edge of that migration."

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

---------------->

The problem with that is that while there are indeed indications of that
migration within "Irish" Y-Chromosomes, the conclusion is erroneously made
that because the Irish are generally "white", it doesn't mean that the
original suppliers of that strand were "white".
That the British Isles represents the western edge of your migration only
means that the British Isles are likely to be the place where the "Aryan"
racial stock is the most "watered down", and by implication "white"
"American" descendants of Irish immigrants are likely to also be the most
"watered down" example of "Aryan" racial stock, and that they are generally
"white" may actually be a sign of that.

As I stated earlier, at least 5% of "white" Americans aren't "white" by
their own definition. That's because that 5% have the blood of negro slaves
mixed into their genetic make-up.
On the other hand, many "American" negroes have "Irish" chromosomes. Are we
to extrapolate then that negroes are "Aryan"?

Are you familiar with the "black" Irish? (who were a minority)

Are you familiar with the Basque people? (likely to be the least adulterated
descendants of "Aryans", but generally not blue eyed blondes)

below
"Honest Aryan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Baba Dadá said:

I'm familiar with all the info in the link you provide for an answer. The
problem is that Aryan and "white" aren't necessarily the same thing.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,926038,00.html

"Later migrations coincided with the expansion of the Indo-European
languages, including Latin, German, Sanskrit and English. Linguists
have long sought a homeland for the Indo-Europeans. The genetic data
favours an origin on the Russian steppes with a group of nomadic
farmers known as the Kurgan who domesticated the horse and rode out to
invade India and Europe. Studies of Irish Y-chromosomes indicate that
the British Isles represents the western edge of that migration."

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

---------------->

The problem with that is that while there are indeed indications of that
migration within "Irish" Y-Chromosomes, the conclusion is erroneously made
that because the Irish are generally "white", it doesn't mean that the
original suppliers of that strand were "white".
That the British Isles represents the western edge of your migration only
means that the British Isles are likely to be the place where the "Aryan"
racial stock is the most "watered down", and by implication "white"
"American" descendants of Irish immigrants are likely to also be the most
"watered down" example of "Aryan" racial stock, and that they are generally
"white" may actually be a sign of that.

As I stated earlier, at least 5% of "white" Americans aren't "white" by
their own definition. That's because that 5% have the blood of negro slaves
mixed into their genetic make-up.
On the other hand, many "American" negroes have "Irish" chromosomes. Are we
to extrapolate then that negroes are "Aryan"?

Are you familiar with the "black" Irish? (who were a minority)

Are you familiar with the Basque people? (likely to be the least adulterated
descendants of "Aryans", but generally not blue eyed blondes)

Baba Dadá said:

Very interesting, but I'm not debating that Aryans ever existed or that they
migrated all over.
My contention is: a) That they were not necessarily "white" (a minority of
red or blonde hair and blue eyes does not dictate a majority with white
skin).

They had to be. White skin, blond/red
hair, blue eyes etc. are *RECESSIVE* traits,
which is why Aryans instituted the 'caste
system' (apartheid) in India.

http://www.dalitstan.org/holocaust/invasion/histgene.html

Quoted message said:

Since you ignored my questions about "black Irish" and the "Basque" peoples,
I assume you're not familiar with either. I suggest that you do some
reading, you might find the subjects very interesting, particularly the
Basque...

You'll have to tell me about them.
Seems ancient Brits were White:

http://www.cheddarsomerset.co.uk/History/Cheddar%20Man.htm

http://www.trussel.com/prehist/news11.htm

"The Japan Times, March 9, 1997
Descendant of Stone Age skeleton found

LONDON (Reuter) British scientists Saturday celebrated their
feat of tracing a living descendant of a 9,000-year-old
skeleton and establishing the world's oldest known family tree.

In an astonishing piece of detective work, they matched mitochondrial
DNA material extracted from the tooth cavity of Britain's oldest
complete skeleton with that of a 42-year-old history teacher, Adrian
Targett.

The genetic material showed without doubt that Targett is a
direct descendant through his mother's line of the skeleton
known as Cheddar Man, which was found in 1903 in caves in
Cheddar Gorge in southwest England."

--
Visit the Cybermuseum of BBC War Crimes at:
http://users.bluecarrots.com/rbisto/BBC/BBC.html
Admission *FREE* - even for libruls!

"Honest Aryan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Baba Dadá said:

Very interesting, but I'm not debating that Aryans ever existed or that

they

Quoted message said:

migrated all over.
My contention is: a) That they were not necessarily "white" (a minority of
red or blonde hair and blue eyes does not dictate a majority with white
skin).

They had to be. White skin, blond/red
hair, blue eyes etc. are *RECESSIVE* traits,
which is why Aryans instituted the 'caste
system' (apartheid) in India.

Oh come now, don't define the caste system for me. But since you bring that
up, I'm of the opinion that they set that up not only as a matter of the
elite retaining power but also to keep track of who they were because of the
growing lack of difference between the conquered classes and the conquering
(and eventually assimilated and therefore conquered in turn) Bhramin class.

Red hair is recessive? My father's twin brother had red hair and blue eyes,
my father brown/brown
I know blue eyed Negroes. Green eyes too.

Ok. What's your thesis then? I understand you're proud of what you
understand to be your racial
heritage. But what precisely makes you a racist, and I assume, a white
supremacist?
Surely you know that we can all be tracked back to the same small family?

Baba Dadá said:

Ok. What's your thesis then? I understand you're proud of what you
understand to be your racial
heritage. But what precisely makes you a racist, and I assume, a white
supremacist?
Surely you know that we can all be tracked back to the same small family?

See my "Racial History Of The World"
(abridged).

--
Visit the Cybermuseum of BBC War Crimes at:
http://users.bluecarrots.com/rbisto/BBC/BBC.html
Admission *FREE* - even for libruls!

My fellow racists (Whites only),
The neurochemical basis for Whites' unique
ability to sustain Democracy and the ongoing
revolution of Progress, through several millennia,
is due to just the right balance between Brains
and Balls.
Empirical evidence, from three continents
and 6,000 years of recorded history, shows the
Negro as incapable of sustaining a technological
society under the rule of law, because of too
little intelligence and too much testosterone.
Asians, with their superior intelligence, have
been building technological civilisations almost
as long as Whites, but too little testosterone
means that they lack the 'oomph' needed to establish
the notion of the individual, leading to despotism,
stagnation and no professional footballers in the
White lands.
(Asians' attenuated sensory system also brutalises
their behaviour and limits their intelligence largely
to the nerdy and uncreative sort but that, as we say
on Usenet, is another thread).

--
Visit the Cybermuseum of BBC War Crimes at:
http://users.bluecarrots.com/rbisto/BBC/BBC.html
Admission *FREE* - even for libruls!

"Honest Aryan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

My fellow racists (Whites only),
The neurochemical basis for Whites' unique
ability to sustain Democracy and the ongoing
revolution of Progress, through several millennia,
is due to just the right balance between Brains
and Balls.
Empirical evidence, from three continents
and 6,000 years of recorded history, shows the
Negro as incapable of sustaining a technological
society under the rule of law, because of too
little intelligence and too much testosterone.
Asians, with their superior intelligence, have
been building technological civilisations almost
as long as Whites, but too little testosterone
means that they lack the 'oomph' needed to establish
the notion of the individual, leading to despotism,
stagnation and no professional footballers in the
White lands.
(Asians' attenuated sensory system also brutalises
their behaviour and limits their intelligence largely
to the nerdy and uncreative sort but that, as we say
on Usenet, is another thread).

That was a serious question. I was looking for scientific reasoning.
I won't debate you. But I've seen some extremely intelligent Negroes,
Asians with more testosterone than they knew what to do with,
and some very stupid chicken [censored] white boys.
But that's another topic altogether.

One more question for you though. About those Stars and Bars on your site.
Is that supposed to be a symbol of white supremacy even though it stands for
an economy
that needed it's stupid slaves with the high levels of testosterone in order
to survive?

A truly supreme race could have just killed off the Negroes altogether
and developed technology to replace the slave labor...

Honest Aryan said:

Baba Dadá said:

I'm familiar with all the info in the link you provide for an answer. The
problem is that Aryan and "white" aren't necessarily the same thing.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,926038,00.html

"Later migrations coincided with the expansion of the Indo-European
languages, including Latin, German, Sanskrit and English. Linguists
have long sought a homeland for the Indo-Europeans. The genetic data
favours an origin on the Russian steppes with a group of nomadic
farmers known as the Kurgan who domesticated the horse and rode out to
invade India and Europe. Studies of Irish Y-chromosomes indicate that
the British Isles represents the western edge of that migration."

"Aryan" and "Indo-European" are linguistic terms, not racial ones.
Just because you speak an Aryan language doesn't mean that you're
descended from the original Aryans. Those studies of the Irish
Y-chromosomes show that the British Isles represents the western edge
of that migration precisely because that's where the *least* trace of
the original Kurgan (or "Aryan" if you must) chromosomal structure is.
That's where it fizzles out. Not to mention that English and the rest
of the Germanic languages are the most highly bastardized Indo-European
group, meaning that the original "Aryans" most likely mixed with a
non-Aryan population to give rise to the Germanic branch.

Honest Aryan said:

Baba Dadá said:

I'm familiar with all the info in the link you provide for an answer. The
problem is that Aryan and "white" aren't necessarily the same thing.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,926038,00.html

"Later migrations coincided with the expansion of the Indo-European
languages, including Latin, German, Sanskrit and English. Linguists
have long sought a homeland for the Indo-Europeans. The genetic data
favours an origin on the Russian steppes with a group of nomadic
farmers known as the Kurgan who domesticated the horse and rode out to
invade India and Europe. Studies of Irish Y-chromosomes indicate that
the British Isles represents the western edge of that migration."

"Aryan" and "Indo-European" are linguistic terms, not racial ones.
Just because you speak an Aryan language doesn't mean that you're
descended from the original Aryans. Those studies of the Irish
Y-chromosomes show that the British Isles represents the western edge
of that migration precisely because that's where the *least* trace of
the original Kurgan (or "Aryan" if you must) chromosomal structure is.
That's where it fizzles out. Not to mention that English and the rest
of the Germanic languages are the most highly bastardized Indo-European
group, meaning that the original "Aryans" most likely mixed with a
non-Aryan population to give rise to the Germanic branch.

"Carmen L. Abruzzi" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Honest Aryan said:

Baba Dadá said:

I'm familiar with all the info in the link you provide for an answer.

The

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

problem is that Aryan and "white" aren't necessarily the same thing.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,926038,00.html

"Later migrations coincided with the expansion of the Indo-European
languages, including Latin, German, Sanskrit and English. Linguists
have long sought a homeland for the Indo-Europeans. The genetic data
favours an origin on the Russian steppes with a group of nomadic
farmers known as the Kurgan who domesticated the horse and rode out to
invade India and Europe. Studies of Irish Y-chromosomes indicate that
the British Isles represents the western edge of that migration."

"Aryan" and "Indo-European" are linguistic terms, not racial ones.
Just because you speak an Aryan language doesn't mean that you're
descended from the original Aryans. Those studies of the Irish
Y-chromosomes show that the British Isles represents the western edge
of that migration precisely because that's where the *least* trace of
the original Kurgan (or "Aryan" if you must) chromosomal structure is.
That's where it fizzles out. Not to mention that English and the rest
of the Germanic languages are the most highly bastardized Indo-European
group, meaning that the original "Aryans" most likely mixed with a
non-Aryan population to give rise to the Germanic branch.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

-------------------------> Exactly. Not "most likely", definitely! The

original ethnic clan whose tongue was Kurgan was assimilated and the group's
language mutated and integrated into the local languages as did the people,
racially and culturally.

ISP - [email hidden], [email hidden]

Baba Dadá said:

That was a serious question. I was looking for scientific reasoning.
I won't debate you. But I've seen some extremely intelligent Negroes,
Asians with more testosterone than they knew what to do with,
and some very stupid chicken [censored] white boys.

Racial groupings are normalised *DISTRIBUTIONS*
(i.e. bell curves) centred on different means, so
their 'tails' overlap.

--
Visit the Cybermuseum of BBC War Crimes at:
http://users.bluecarrots.com/rbisto/BBC/BBC.html
Admission *FREE* - even for libruls!

"Honest Aryan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Baba Dadá said:

That was a serious question. I was looking for scientific reasoning.
I won't debate you. But I've seen some extremely intelligent Negroes,
Asians with more testosterone than they knew what to do with,
and some very stupid chicken [censored] white boys.

Racial groupings are normalised *DISTRIBUTIONS*
(i.e. bell curves) centred on different means, so
their 'tails' overlap.

Ok, I'll grant you that. (though I must be stuck observing the same part of
the bell over and over, 'cause I've seen more than my share of those
intelligent negroes and stupid chicken [censored] white boys...).
But I still don't think that there's enough unassimilated "Aryan" stock to
warrant an aspiration to
even define a "white supremacy", let alone think that any type of survivable
"apartheid" type social
system could be created. You've been "distributed".

"Baba Dadá" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"Honest Aryan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Baba Dadá said:

That was a serious question. I was looking for scientific reasoning.
I won't debate you. But I've seen some extremely intelligent Negroes,
Asians with more testosterone than they knew what to do with,
and some very stupid chicken [censored] white boys.

Must agree with you....some of the most stupid of all mankind is that part
of society that I belong to....in other words I am a 'whitey'...take George
Bush for example.

"Harold Walker" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"Baba Dadá" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"Honest Aryan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Baba Dadá said:

That was a serious question. I was looking for scientific reasoning.
I won't debate you. But I've seen some extremely intelligent Negroes,
Asians with more testosterone than they knew what to do with,
and some very stupid chicken [censored] white boys.

Must agree with you....some of the most stupid of all mankind is that part
of society that I belong to....in other words I am a 'whitey'...take

George

Quoted message said:

Bush for example.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

---------------------> I'm not sure about "Dubya" being all that stupid

Harold. ( Hey "Walker", any relation?). I think he might just be a better
actor than "Ronnie" and crazy like a fox.
There's a method to their madness and it's actually the same method as Slick
Willie and Company.
No stupid white boys there. Just sly.

As far as the distribution of stupidity, etc., I really think it's fairly
even.
Some folks have bigger butts, some can dance better, and some can jump...
And it takes all kinds.
I just wish they'd stop letting so many undocumented aliens into the
country. (US)