you know? said:Sorry to reply to my own post, but in case you're interested here's my nearly finished response to
the RVLR consultation:
<http://www.chapmancentral.com/Web/public.nsf/Documents/Road_Vehicle_Lighting_Regulations>
WRT the red flashing lights on recovery vehicles.
I think you are missing an important point here (I suspect you have probably thought about this but
it seems to be missing from your response) :-
On the motorway when driving along it can be very hard to see the recovery vehicle _operator_ due,
in large part to the abundance of very bright flashing lights on the recovery vehicle.
Because of this it would make sense for the _operator_ to be fitted with distinctive flashing lights
(they could afford to be very bright as the operator is usually not out of his vehicle for more than
an hour so a rechargable system that recharged from the cigarette lighter could be employed)
- this is not as easy for cyclists who may do several hours of cycling in the dark and can't afford
20W of flashing red light to the rear as well as 20W to the front)
But adding more lights to the recovery vehicle is not going to make the operator more visible.
I would also say that flashing red lights on a police vehicle have a significantly different use. It
is not uncommon for police cars to be stopped _in the carriageway_ and the red lights, in this
circumstance, are not warning lights but instruction lights - you MUST stop in this lane. The use of
these flashing red lights on the hard shoulder is harder to defend.
Tim.
--
God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = - @B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t," and there was light.
tjw.hn.orgtjw.hn.orgOpen ↗ locofungus.btinternet.co.uklocofungus.btinternet.co.ukOpen ↗