General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

peas solve this riddle

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 10 posts · 373 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
20 September 2005
Last activity
23 September 2005
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
10
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
373
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–10 of 10
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Greetings,

    At Wal*Mart they sell two kinds of peas. One can costs 33c and
    contains 110 cal per serving. Another can costs 46c and contains 60
    cal per serving. The cans are exactly the same size with the same
    ingredients listed in the same order with the same serving size. Why
    does one can contain almost twice the calories?

    Thank you for your time and energy,
    William

  2. Quoted message said:

    Greetings,

    At Wal*Mart they sell two kinds of peas. One can costs 33c and
    contains 110 cal per serving. Another can costs 46c and contains 60
    cal per serving. The cans are exactly the same size with the same
    ingredients listed in the same order with the same serving size. Why
    does one can contain almost twice the calories?

    Thank you for your time and energy,
    William

    110 - 60 = 50 / 4 = 12.5 grams of sugar more in the high cal can.

    TC

  3. TC said:
    Quoted message said:

    Greetings,

    At Wal*Mart they sell two kinds of peas. One can costs 33c and
    contains 110 cal per serving. Another can costs 46c and contains 60
    cal per serving. The cans are exactly the same size with the same
    ingredients listed in the same order with the same serving size. Why
    does one can contain almost twice the calories?

    Thank you for your time and energy,
    William

    110 - 60 = 50 / 4 = 12.5 grams of sugar more in the high cal can.

    TC

    Greetings,

    That is what I thought at first except there are only 5 grams of sugar
    per serving in the 110 cal can. The other can has 3 grams of sugar per
    serving only accounting for 8 of the missing cals so it isn't that
    simple.

    William

  4. Quoted message said:
    TC said:
    Quoted message said:

    Greetings,

    At Wal*Mart they sell two kinds of peas. One can costs 33c and
    contains 110 cal per serving. Another can costs 46c and contains 60
    cal per serving. The cans are exactly the same size with the same
    ingredients listed in the same order with the same serving size. Why
    does one can contain almost twice the calories?

    Thank you for your time and energy,
    William

    110 - 60 = 50 / 4 = 12.5 grams of sugar more in the high cal can.

    TC

    Greetings,

    That is what I thought at first except there are only 5 grams of sugar
    per serving in the 110 cal can. The other can has 3 grams of sugar per
    serving only accounting for 8 of the missing cals so it isn't that
    simple.

    William

    Well then, this is just a clear example of how the calorie counting
    concept completely falls apart when applied in the real world. Food
    manufacturers base their numbers on rough estimates put together by the
    USDA using averaging and factoring and other assorted fudge factors to
    come up with some semblance of an estimate. Then the food manufacturer
    is given all kinds of leeway on exactly how he does the calculation.
    Then the authorities do nothing to ensure that the manufacturers use
    the numbers to calculate the calories properly.

    One big, vague, averaged, factored, fudged system of quantifying the
    approximate energy value of foods and a system allowing the
    manufacturers to use the numbers to their advantage. Hardly a recipe
    for accuracy.

    TC

  5. "[email hidden]" <[email hidden]> wrote in part:

    Quoted message said:

    Greetings,

    At Wal*Mart they sell two kinds of peas. One can costs 33c and
    contains 110 cal per serving. Another can costs 46c and contains 60
    cal per serving. The cans are exactly the same size with the same
    ingredients listed in the same order with the same serving size. Why
    does one can contain almost twice the calories?

    Thank you for your time and energy,
    William

    There are lots of different types of peas.
    --
    Jim Chinnis Warrenton, Virginia, USA [email hidden]

  6. Are the serving sizes the same on both cans.

    Have you purchased one of each and poured out the liquid to see if the quantity
    of peas is the same in both brands. Sometimes they add a lot of water and less
    peas.

    Ora

    email hidden said:

    Greetings,

    At Wal*Mart they sell two kinds of peas. One can costs 33c and
    contains 110 cal per serving. Another can costs 46c and contains 60
    cal per serving. The cans are exactly the same size with the same
    ingredients listed in the same order with the same serving size. Why
    does one can contain almost twice the calories?

    Thank you for your time and energy,
    William

  7. Quoted message said:

    Greetings,

    At Wal*Mart they sell two kinds of peas. One can costs 33c and
    contains 110 cal per serving. Another can costs 46c and contains 60
    cal per serving. The cans are exactly the same size with the same
    ingredients listed in the same order with the same serving size. Why
    does one can contain almost twice the calories?

    Thank you for your time and energy,
    William

    COMMENT:

    What is the actual serving size? My guess is that with numbers that
    far off, one of the cans simply has a math error, and is reporting a
    mistake.

    SBH

  8. Quoted message said:

    Are the serving sizes the same on both cans.

    Have you purchased one of each and poured out the liquid to see if the quantity
    of peas is the same in both brands. Sometimes they add a lot of water and less
    peas.

    Ora

    email hidden said:

    Greetings,

    At Wal*Mart they sell two kinds of peas. One can costs 33c and
    contains 110 cal per serving. Another can costs 46c and contains 60
    cal per serving. The cans are exactly the same size with the same
    ingredients listed in the same order with the same serving size. Why
    does one can contain almost twice the calories?

    Thank you for your time and energy,
    William

    Greetings,

    a) Yes. The servings sizes are the same.
    b) No. I have not done a side by side compair but I have had both and
    one doesn't appear half empty.
    c) Perhaps I will do the side-by-side to test the water theory.

    William

  9. Jim Chinnis said:

    "[email hidden]" <[email hidden]> wrote in part:

    Quoted message said:

    Greetings,

    At Wal*Mart they sell two kinds of peas. One can costs 33c and
    contains 110 cal per serving. Another can costs 46c and contains 60
    cal per serving. The cans are exactly the same size with the same
    ingredients listed in the same order with the same serving size. Why
    does one can contain almost twice the calories?

    Thank you for your time and energy,
    William

    There are lots of different types of peas.
    --
    Jim Chinnis Warrenton, Virginia, USA [email hidden]

    Greetings Mr. Chinnis,

    Both peas appear "standard". I would be shocked to find that one type
    of "standard" pea had twice the caloric density of another -- but this
    is not a field which I know much about.

    Thank you for your time,
    William

  10. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Greetings,

    At Wal*Mart they sell two kinds of peas. One can costs 33c and
    contains 110 cal per serving. Another can costs 46c and contains 60
    cal per serving. The cans are exactly the same size with the same
    ingredients listed in the same order with the same serving size. Why
    does one can contain almost twice the calories?

    Thank you for your time and energy,
    William

    Young peas ("garden fresh"😉 vs old peas ("mushy peas" or almost).

    Older have more (complex) carbs than young, and more protein.

    Maybe one is drained weight and the other is gross...

    But probably at least one [censored] table...

    T.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.