CyclingForums
A community for cyclists, gear, training and racing.
Power meters · Public discussion
Thread navigation
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
for some strange reason i added up all the checkmarks in the training zones from cycling peaks and came up with these totals
L1=0
L2=13
L3=23
L4=27
L5=27
L6=15
L7=8
so if youre workouts were all beased on L4&L5 you would get the highest score
any comments 🙂
Those checkmarks just tell you the type of effects a particular training level has on a particular system. Vast quantities of L4 won't make you a sprinter.
PhilH said:Those checkmarks just tell you the type of effects a particular training level has on a particular system. Vast quantities of L4 won't make you a sprinter.
Youre right... but you would not get the highest score so you would lose the race and be the best sprinter if i read the levels correctly🙂
grom said:any comments 🙂
Yeah
1. Minute per minute, the higher levels result in more adaptation, but this is somewhat countered by being able to do more volume at the lower intensities.
2. Train hard😄
grom said:Youre right... but you would not get the highest score so you would lose the race and be the best sprinter if i read the levels correctly🙂
Unlike football, I'm afraid having the highest score doesn't mean you win. I'd also be surprised if one could draw any meaningful conclusion by tallying those checkmarks the way you did.
Grom,
Thanks for attempting to inject a bit of humour.
Active in the last 60 minutes
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.