General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Path impassable what do I do

Started by Gwyn · · Last activity · 52 posts · 651 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
12 July 2007
Last activity
14 July 2007
Original author
Gwyn
Posts
52
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
651
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 52
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I have a footpath near me in Withernsea which goes from the edge of
    the golf course to Noth Carr Dales Road TA 339267 to TA 338260.
    Now I tried to walk it last Sunday and it was like a jungle basically
    the land owner has sown crops right across it. Now it is a really
    convienient way for me to get to Hollym in Winter but Summer seems out
    of bounds. Ive Emailed the footpath man at the council and he said he
    will cut the part nearest the hedge (although he doesnt know when the
    1 time this year cut will be)which goes about half way from NCDR not
    as the OS map says all the way as I believe at one point the farmer
    has removed a field boundary. The rest of the path goes right across
    the field and the footpath man doesn't know his details so basically
    I'm at a dead end unless someone can tell me how to find out who the
    landowner is.
    What about contacting the RA will they be able to do something.

    Oh yes there is a disused railway line that parallels the path but its
    private and I believe flooded at the moment due to the recent rains.

    So what do I do please offer help.
    --
    Gwyn. [email hidden]
    Remove rem if replying
    note return address is your own computer;-)

  2. "Gwyn" <g@> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I have a footpath near me in Withernsea which goes from the edge of
    the golf course to Noth Carr Dales Road TA 339267 to TA 338260.
    Now I tried to walk it last Sunday and it was like a jungle basically
    the ... <snip>

    If not one already,become a member of the Ramblers...

    IIRC in that part of UK farmer may grow crops butmust clear path after a
    bit...
    see..

    http://www.ramblers.org.uk/info/britain/footpathlaw.html

    in particular ...

    (I quote from RA web site..)

    "

    20. What about crops growing on or over a path?
    The landowner has a duty to prevent a crop (other than grass) from making
    the path difficult to find or follow. The minimum widths given in Q18 apply
    here also, but if the path is a field-edge path they are increased to 1.5m
    for a footpath, 3m for a bridleway. You have every right to walk through
    crops growing on or over a path, but stick as close as you can to its
    correct line. Report the problem to the highway authority: it has power to
    prosecute the landowner or cut the crop and send the owner the bill.

    "
    but, check it is right-of-way...
    "
    3. How do I know whether a path is a public right of way or not?
    The safest evidence is the official 'definitive map' of public rights of
    way. These maps are available for public inspection at the offices of local
    highway authorities (see Q7). Some are also available in libraries and some
    are sold by the councils concerned. In addition, public rights of way
    information derived from them, as amended by subsequent orders (see Q24), is
    shown by the Ordnance Survey on its Explorer,and Pathfinder maps (see Maps).

    Some rights of way are not yet shown on definitive maps. These can quite
    properly be used, and application may be made to highway authorities for
    them to be added to the map. The inner London boroughs are not required to
    produce definitive maps, though this does not mean there are no rights of
    way in inner London.

    "
    Yours aye

    Rab

  3. The message <[email hidden]>
    from Gwyn <g@> contains these words:

    Quoted message said:

    What about contacting the RA will they be able to do something.

    Quoted message said:

    Oh yes there is a disused railway line that parallels the path but its
    private and I believe flooded at the moment due to the recent rains.

    Quoted message said:

    So what do I do please offer help.

    The Ramblers may be able to help. So also might your local councillor if
    the footpath man is not prepared to do anything. It is my understanding
    that farmers are obliged to reinstate within a limited period paths they
    they have ploughed up. It is also my understanding that the recording of
    public footpaths on OS maps is frequently inaccurate so the path may not
    go exactly where you think it should. Consult the Local Authority
    Definitive Map.

    --
    Roger Chapman
    Nearest Marilyn still to be visited - Great Orme.
    89 miles as the crow flies,
    considerably more as the walker drives.

  4. Contact your local Council. It is the responsability of the Highways Agency
    (a department of the council) to ensure
    rights of way are kept clear by landowners (it is ultimately the landowners
    responsability to keep them clear).

    Parish councils often have a programme to assist in keeping paths clear,
    often manned by volunteers, as landowners
    can be a little lax in this area! May be worth contacting the Parish Council
    first.

    Good luck!

    David Gibbins

    "Gwyn" <g@> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I have a footpath near me in Withernsea which goes from the edge of
    the golf course to Noth Carr Dales Road TA 339267 to TA 338260.
    Now I tried to walk it last Sunday and it was like a jungle basically
    the land owner has sown crops right across it. Now it is a really
    convienient way for me to get to Hollym in Winter but Summer seems out
    of bounds. Ive Emailed the footpath man at the council and he said he
    will cut the part nearest the hedge (although he doesnt know when the
    1 time this year cut will be)which goes about half way from NCDR not
    as the OS map says all the way as I believe at one point the farmer
    has removed a field boundary. The rest of the path goes right across
    the field and the footpath man doesn't know his details so basically
    I'm at a dead end unless someone can tell me how to find out who the
    landowner is.
    What about contacting the RA will they be able to do something.

    Oh yes there is a disused railway line that parallels the path but its
    private and I believe flooded at the moment due to the recent rains.

    So what do I do please offer help.
    --
    Gwyn. [email hidden]
    Remove rem if replying
    note return address is your own computer;-)

  5. P.S.

    This may be of interest - page down to heading
    'Protecting & maintaining rights of way'

    http://www.defra.gov.uk/wildlife-countryside/issues/public/index.htm

    "pennineway" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Contact your local Council. It is the responsability of the Highways
    Agency (a department of the council) to ensure
    rights of way are kept clear by landowners (it is ultimately the
    landowners responsability to keep them clear).

    Parish councils often have a programme to assist in keeping paths clear,
    often manned by volunteers, as landowners
    can be a little lax in this area! May be worth contacting the Parish
    Council first.

    Good luck!

    David Gibbins

    "Gwyn" <g@> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I have a footpath near me in Withernsea which goes from the edge of
    the golf course to Noth Carr Dales Road TA 339267 to TA 338260.
    Now I tried to walk it last Sunday and it was like a jungle basically
    the land owner has sown crops right across it. Now it is a really
    convienient way for me to get to Hollym in Winter but Summer seems out
    of bounds. Ive Emailed the footpath man at the council and he said he
    will cut the part nearest the hedge (although he doesnt know when the
    1 time this year cut will be)which goes about half way from NCDR not
    as the OS map says all the way as I believe at one point the farmer
    has removed a field boundary. The rest of the path goes right across
    the field and the footpath man doesn't know his details so basically
    I'm at a dead end unless someone can tell me how to find out who the
    landowner is.
    What about contacting the RA will they be able to do something.

    Oh yes there is a disused railway line that parallels the path but its
    private and I believe flooded at the moment due to the recent rains.

    So what do I do please offer help.
    --
    Gwyn. [email hidden]
    Remove rem if replying
    note return address is your own computer;-)

  6. pennineway said:

    Contact your local Council. It is the responsability of the Highways Agency
    (a department of the council) to ensure
    rights of way are kept clear by landowners (it is ultimately the landowners
    responsability to keep them clear).

    My County Council just can't do the work. The rain has caused a lot of
    paths to be overgrown (this would usually be a month earlier and 1 cut
    would do it).
    In addition, some paths are impassable due to rape falling over and the
    council generally doesn't clear those. Means that we can't use a couple of
    useful paths.
    IIRC, if the path has an impassable crop, one is allowed to use any
    reasonable route.

    Quoted message said:

    Parish councils often have a programme to assist in keeping paths clear,
    often manned by volunteers, as landowners
    can be a little lax in this area! May be worth contacting the Parish Council
    first.


    Trouble is, I'm the PPW here! I've been trying to get clearance done and a
    couple have been.
    The CC's RoW team often doesn't know who the landowners are; the Land
    Registry searches have to be paid for and that's too beaurocratic for the
    CC, so I'm trying to find out.

    --
    Peter.
    You don't understand Newton's Third Law of Motion?
    It's not rocket science, you know.

  7. The message <[email hidden]>
    from PeterC <[email hidden]> contains these words:

    Quoted message said:

    The CC's RoW team often doesn't know who the landowners are; the Land
    Registry searches have to be paid for and that's too beaurocratic for the
    CC, so I'm trying to find out.

    £2 a throw on line but that probably won't help. Most farms have been in
    the same family for generations and may not be registered. OTOH a
    working farm building is easily identifiable on the ground and in any
    situation if the farmer in the closest farm doesn't farm the field in
    question he will almost certainly know who does so just ask.

    --
    Roger Chapman
    Nearest Marilyn still to be visited - Great Orme.
    89 miles as the crow flies,
    considerably more as the walker drives.

  8. Gwyn g@ said:

    I have a footpath near me in Withernsea which goes from the edge of
    the golf course to Noth Carr Dales Road TA 339267 to TA 338260.
    Now I tried to walk it last Sunday and it was like a jungle basically
    the land owner has sown crops right across it. Now it is a really
    convienient way for me to get to Hollym in Winter but Summer seems out
    of bounds. Ive Emailed the footpath man at the council and he said he
    will cut the part nearest the hedge (although he doesnt know when the
    1 time this year cut will be)which goes about half way from NCDR not
    as the OS map says all the way as I believe at one point the farmer
    has removed a field boundary. The rest of the path goes right across
    the field and the footpath man doesn't know his details so basically
    I'm at a dead end unless someone can tell me how to find out who the
    landowner is.
    What about contacting the RA will they be able to do something.

    Oh yes there is a disused railway line that parallels the path but its
    private and I believe flooded at the moment due to the recent rains.

    So what do I do please offer help.

    What is the crop?

    The huge fuss that many ramblers can make about knee high barley is
    pretty silly. Long grass and cereals are a fact of country life and
    should be tolerated by those who choose to walk IMO.

    If on the other hand it's head high maize something seriously needs to
    be done.

  9. The message <[email hidden]>
    from Roger <[email hidden]> contains these words:

    Quoted message said:

    Most farms have been in
    the same family for generations and may not be registered.

    Probably tenant farmers, who don't go on the Land Register m'thinks? But
    is it the land-owner or the occupier who is liable for RoWs? Probably
    both!

    Real problem is that there are not many votes in Rights of Way, nor,
    sadly, even in Public Libraries, so the relevant departments get shaved
    every time the Council sets its budget.

    Richard

  10. The message <[email hidden]>
    from [email hidden] (Tim Jones) contains these words:

    Quoted message said:

    The huge fuss that many ramblers can make about knee high barley is
    pretty silly. Long grass and cereals are a fact of country life and
    should be tolerated by those who choose to walk IMO.

    Yes, if knee high barley, first check that the RoW really does go that
    way, and then enlist a couple of mates to trample back and forward in
    single file.

    Quoted message said:

    If on the other hand it's head high maize something seriously needs to
    be done.

    Yes, twist councillor or MP's arm, or, if (and only if) you are
    seriously wealthy, instrct your solicitors to bring an action against
    the highway authority (not the Highway Agency, a national quango) and/or
    the land owner!

    Richard

  11. Roger said:

    The message <[email hidden]>
    from PeterC <[email hidden]> contains these words:

    Quoted message said:

    The CC's RoW team often doesn't know who the landowners are; the Land
    Registry searches have to be paid for and that's too beaurocratic for the
    CC, so I'm trying to find out.

    £2 a throw on line but that probably won't help. Most farms have been in
    the same family for generations and may not be registered. OTOH a
    working farm building is easily identifiable on the ground and in any
    situation if the farmer in the closest farm doesn't farm the field in
    question he will almost certainly know who does so just ask.

    There are 2 complications:
    farms are being taken over, often by farmers from some distance away
    although a FP is in 'my' parish, the owner often isn't.

    Fortunately, the former manager of the local farm still lives in the house,
    so, now I've managed to contact him, I'll see who he knows.
    --
    Peter.
    You don't understand Newton's Third Law of Motion?
    It's not rocket science, you know.

  12. Richard Spencer said:

    The message <[email hidden]>
    from Roger <[email hidden]> contains these words:

    Quoted message said:

    Most farms have been in
    the same family for generations and may not be registered.

    Probably tenant farmers, who don't go on the Land Register m'thinks? But
    is it the land-owner or the occupier who is liable for RoWs? Probably
    both!


    Logically the Land Registry would keep a record of both (oink-flap).

    Quoted message said:

    Real problem is that there are not many votes in Rights of Way, nor,
    sadly, even in Public Libraries, so the relevant departments get shaved
    every time the Council sets its budget.


    Agreed - more chance of a RoW getting a road on it. The councils should be
    informed of all of the owners as a matter of course. (fly Porciline).

    --
    Peter.
    You don't understand Newton's Third Law of Motion?
    It's not rocket science, you know.

  13. Richard Spencer said:

    The message <[email hidden]>
    from [email hidden] (Tim Jones) contains these words:

    Quoted message said:

    The huge fuss that many ramblers can make about knee high barley is
    pretty silly. Long grass and cereals are a fact of country life and
    should be tolerated by those who choose to walk IMO.

    Yes, if knee high barley, first check that the RoW really does go that
    way, and then enlist a couple of mates to trample back and forward in
    single file.

    Why? Whats the point of putting yourself and your friends to any
    inconvenience when the issue will quickly resolve itself if the path
    is well used?

    If the path isn't wellused it;s hard to see any problem in the first
    place.

  14. The message <[email hidden]>
    from [email hidden] (Tim Jones) contains these words:

    Quoted message said:

    Why? Whats the point of putting yourself and your friends to any
    inconvenience when the issue will quickly resolve itself if the path
    is well used?

    Quoted message said:

    If the path isn't wellused it;s hard to see any problem in the first
    place

    Wading through wet vegetation is not a pleasant experience and not
    having the line of the path marked is a disincentive to many walkers,
    particularly where field boundaries have been grubbed out to make huge
    prairies. For the timid among us growing crops and no path is all than
    it takes to turn them back.

    A section of the original line of the Essex Way was diverted onto other
    footpaths and I am sure that part of the reason was that prior to the
    introduction of the Essex Way it was hardly used. The reason why it was
    not used was probably obstruction. Part of the diverted length was
    through a caravan site and the actual line per the definitive map had
    long since been blocked by permanently sited caravans and even a
    permanent brick building and other measures had also been taken to
    discourage use. The other part ran through arable fields and it was
    usually impossible to find the line. Ironically (but possibly good PR)
    the year before the path was diverted new plank bridges were put in over
    the ditches and the line of the path spray cleared shortly after the
    crops germinated.

    --
    Roger Chapman
    Nearest Marilyn still to be visited - Great Orme.
    89 miles as the crow flies,
    considerably more as the walker drives.

  15. Bitstring <[email hidden]>, from the wonderful
    person Tim Jones <[email hidden]> said
    <snip>

    Quoted message said:

    The huge fuss that many ramblers can make about knee high barley is
    pretty silly. Long grass and cereals are a fact of country life and
    should be tolerated by those who choose to walk IMO.

    The law has a different view. And if the cereal crop is wet (even more
    so if it is beans, or root crops) it is a real PITA to walk through.
    Some of these ROWs are used by granny getting to the shops, not just
    determined, fully kevlar equipped, ramblers.

    Quoted message said:


    If on the other hand it's head high maize something seriously needs to
    be done.

    Or oil seed rape, which matures like barbed wire entanglements.

    --
    GSV Three Minds in a Can
    8,963 Km walked. 1,746Km PROWs surveyed. 31.7% complete.

  16. On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 14:43:56 GMT, [email hidden] (Tim

    Jones) said:


    What is the crop?

    The huge fuss that many ramblers can make about knee high barley is
    pretty silly. Long grass and cereals are a fact of country life and
    should be tolerated by those who choose to walk IMO.

    I agree. Some farmers don't, however, we once got an ear bashing
    about destroying crops as we followed the RoW across a field of
    barley.

    S.

    --
    Stop ID cards and the Database State
    http://www.no2id.net/

  17. In message <[email hidden]>, Tim Jones
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:

    The huge fuss that many ramblers can make about knee high barley is
    pretty silly. Long grass and cereals are a fact of country life and
    should be tolerated by those who choose to walk IMO.


    Like that bunch of wimps who whinged about a tiny little bit of bracken
    on Bryn Arw last summer :-)

    --
    Martin Richardson
    664/1554 Marilyns - aiming for 777 71/118 New Donalds - only 40% to go
    88/211 Irish Hewitts - 123, it's easy 42/220 Corbetts - only 81% to go

  18. Martin Richardson said:
    Quoted message said:

    The huge fuss that many ramblers can make about knee high barley is
    pretty silly. Long grass and cereals are a fact of country life and
    should be tolerated by those who choose to walk IMO.


    Like that bunch of wimps who whinged about a tiny little bit of bracken
    on Bryn Arw last summer :-)

    I was just thinking about that. What we needed was more small
    children. Perhaps we could have tied them together and got them to be
    a bit more organised in their trampling.

    J

  19. The message <[email hidden]>
    from Martin Richardson <[email hidden]> contains these words:

    Quoted message said:

    Like that bunch of wimps who whinged about a tiny little bit of bracken
    on Bryn Arw last summer :-)

    Well it was man eating bracken. :-)

    --
    Roger Chapman
    Nearest Marilyn still to be visited - Great Orme.
    89 miles as the crow flies,
    considerably more as the walker drives.

  20. In article <[email hidden]>, Roger
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:

    The message <[email hidden]>
    from Martin Richardson <[email hidden]> contains these words:

    Quoted message said:

    Like that bunch of wimps who whinged about a tiny little bit of bracken
    on Bryn Arw last summer :-)

    Well it was man eating bracken. :-)


    Send a woman in to sort it out then :-)

    --

    Dominic Sexton

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.