http://www.eurosport.com/cycling/tour-de-france/2006/sport_sto896349.shtml
Road Cycling · Public discussion
Pasta for the Buffalo
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Road Cycling
- Published
- 1 June 2006
- Last activity
- 2 June 2006
- Original author
- Mark
- Posts
- 7
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 547
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
Mark said:
http://www.eurosport.com/cycling/tour-de-france/2006/sport_sto896349.shtml
"Gutierrez was filmed by hidden cameras entering Fuentes' clinics [...]
according to Spanish magazine Interviu."That's false. The magazine says nothing about Gutierrez appearing in the
films.Jenko
-
On Thu, 01 Jun 2006 19:18:26 +0200, Jenko <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
Mark said:
http://www.eurosport.com/cycling/tour-de-france/2006/sport_sto896349.shtml
"Gutierrez was filmed by hidden cameras entering Fuentes' clinics [...]
according to Spanish magazine Interviu."That's false. The magazine says nothing about Gutierrez appearing in the
films.Jenko
Are you talking about a specific article, or discounting the
possibility that the magazine supported its article with additional
information through other channels - like an Internet site?Curtis L. Russell
Odenton, MD (USA)
Just someone on two wheels... -
Curtis L. Russell said:
Quoted message said:
Mark said:
http://www.eurosport.com/cycling/tour-de-france/2006/sport_sto896349.shtml
"Gutierrez was filmed by hidden cameras entering Fuentes' clinics [...]
according to Spanish magazine Interviu."That's false. The magazine says nothing about Gutierrez appearing in the
films.Are you talking about a specific article, or discounting the
possibility that the magazine supported its article with additional
information through other channels - like an Internet site?I'm talking about the above quoted sentence. It's false.
Jenko
-
On Thu, 01 Jun 2006 22:16:32 +0200, Jenko <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
I'm talking about the above quoted sentence. It's false.
Well, it could be both false and true, so that doesn't really answer
my question. If you mean that the printed content of the magazine did
not have the reference, it still leaves other responses (the New York
Times responds to charges outside of its own pages all the time).Have to say that the web site is the most circular one I've seen in
recent memory. Every reference I clicked on returned me to one of
their articles - nothing that I clicked on led to more or better
explanations.Curtis L. Russell
Odenton, MD (USA)
Just someone on two wheels... -
Curtis L. Russell said:
On Thu, 01 Jun 2006 22:16:32 +0200, Jenko <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
I'm talking about the above quoted sentence. It's false.
Well, it could be both false and true,
Dumbass,
Is that anything like being "fake, but accurate"?
-
SH said:
Is that anything like being "fake, but accurate"?
Actually, these can easily coexist. Sort of like the answer when
asking about the bust size of most of the Playboy Playmates.Curtis L. Russell
Odenton, MD (USA)
Just someone on two wheels...
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.