Recumbent bicycles · Public discussion

Pashley? Worth considering?

Started by Brian Millson · 2 April 2005 · Last activity 4 April 2005 · 21 posts · 1,551 views

← Back to Recumbent bicycles

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

01 / Original postPashley? Worth considering?Brian Millson · 2 Apr 2005 02 / This pagePosts 21–21Page 2 of 2 · chronological order 03 / Latest replyPost #21Naqerj · 4 Apr 2005

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section: Recumbent bicycles
Published: 2 April 2005
Last activity: 4 April 2005
Original author: Brian Millson
Posts: 21
Discussion status: Public discussion
Total views: 1,551
Views / 30 days: 0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Naqerj
Archived post

4 April 2005, 18:08 UTC #21

Just zis Guy said:
On Sun, 03 Apr 2005 19:44:04 +0100, Naqerj
<[email hidden]> wrote in message
<[email hidden]>:
Nonononono! You have it all wrong. You said
Quoted message said:
Just zis Guy, you know? wrote:
But the quoted text (outdented by two for clarity) says:
Brian:
Quoted message said:
What pray tell is a Newton conversion?
See? The attributions are quite clear: Brian asked that, not me.
Yes... but... I didn't say you said it, I said that you said that Brian
said it.
I was replying to your post, 'cos Brian's post didn't show up here [1]
so I didn't have it to reply to. The attributions I quoted showed that
I was replying to Brian's question *as quoted by you*.
[1] in u.r.c
--
Andrew

Report

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.