Road Cycling · Public discussion

Parts already obsolete?

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 69 posts · 2,622 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
9 September 2005
Last activity
24 September 2005
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
69
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,622
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 69
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I bought a new Giant bike (hybrid). It has a 7-speed Megarange in the
    back (14-34T), which is great and fine for me. Now I've been reading
    about how they (Shimano) keeps coming out with more speeds every so
    often.. Now, I don't care frankly - I'm not an upgrader or equipment
    nerd and I'm not made of money - I just ride. But, will I be *forced*
    into replacing all of my components in a couple few years when I need
    to replace the cassette?

    Will I go in there only to find out I have to go to 9 speed, get new
    shifters, replace the frame, buy a new bike, sign over my first born
    male son, etc.. ? :-)

  2. Quoted message said:

    I bought a new Giant bike (hybrid). It has a 7-speed Megarange in the
    back (14-34T), which is great and fine for me. Now I've been reading
    about how they (Shimano) keeps coming out with more speeds every so
    often.. Now, I don't care frankly - I'm not an upgrader or equipment
    nerd and I'm not made of money - I just ride. But, will I be *forced*
    into replacing all of my components in a couple few years when I need
    to replace the cassette?

    Will I go in there only to find out I have to go to 9 speed, get new
    shifters, replace the frame, buy a new bike, sign over my first born
    male son, etc.. ? :-)

    Two words for you: e, Bay

  3. Quoted message said:

    I bought a new Giant bike (hybrid). It has a 7-speed Megarange in the
    back (14-34T), which is great and fine for me. Now I've been reading
    about how they (Shimano) keeps coming out with more speeds every so
    often.. Now, I don't care frankly - I'm not an upgrader or equipment
    nerd and I'm not made of money - I just ride. But, will I be *forced*
    into replacing all of my components in a couple few years when I need
    to replace the cassette?

    Will I go in there only to find out I have to go to 9 speed, get new
    shifters, replace the frame, buy a new bike, sign over my first born
    male son, etc.. ? :-)

    Put 3-4K miles on it each year and in 3-4 years you'll feel you're worth
    the award of a new bike, eh?

    jj

  4. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Quoted message said:

    I bought a new Giant bike (hybrid). It has a 7-speed Megarange in the
    back (14-34T), which is great and fine for me. Now I've been reading
    about how they (Shimano) keeps coming out with more speeds every so
    often.. Now, I don't care frankly - I'm not an upgrader or equipment
    nerd and I'm not made of money - I just ride. But, will I be *forced*
    into replacing all of my components in a couple few years when I need
    to replace the cassette?

    7 speed cassettes and chains are still widely available and probably
    will be for a while. If you're worried, just buy a couple of extras now.

  5. [email hidden] wrote in news:1126281770.193405.15990
    @g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:

    Quoted message said:

    I bought a new Giant bike (hybrid). It has a 7-speed Megarange in the
    back (14-34T), which is great and fine for me. Now I've been reading
    about how they (Shimano) keeps coming out with more speeds every so
    often.. Now, I don't care frankly - I'm not an upgrader or equipment
    nerd and I'm not made of money - I just ride. But, will I be *forced*
    into replacing all of my components in a couple few years when I need
    to replace the cassette?

    Will I go in there only to find out I have to go to 9 speed, get new
    shifters, replace the frame, buy a new bike, sign over my first born
    male son, etc.. ? :-)

    Oddly enough, I just got that speech from a backup LBS. I wanted to
    replace the 6-speed cluster on the Trek 400, and they're talking about
    bending the frame to see if an 8 will fit.

    Now, when the angle from the selected chainring in front to the gear on
    the cluster in the rear deviates from 0 relative to the bike, efficiency
    starts getting lost. This means that 5 or 6 speed clusters must always
    be a solution to somebody's riding style -- the upgrades lose
    efficiency for some group of riders. They're throwing out a good thing
    for a worse thing.

    Is that right, or isn't that auto-industry bull-dinky?

    --ag

  6. [email hidden said:

    "]I bought a new Giant bike (hybrid). It has a 7-speed Megarange in the
    back (14-34T), which is great and fine for me. Now I've been reading
    about how they (Shimano) keeps coming out with more speeds every so
    often.. Now, I don't care frankly - I'm not an upgrader or equipment
    nerd and I'm not made of money - I just ride. But, will I be *forced*
    into replacing all of my components in a couple few years when I need
    to replace the cassette?

    Will I go in there only to find out I have to go to 9 speed, get new
    shifters, replace the frame, buy a new bike, sign over my first born
    male son, etc.. ? :-)


    No problem!

    First, the number of gears is not an indication of being obsolete. Case in point, many prefer a double crank rather than a triple, which results in 67% of the gears... Both are equally modern, and both are easily available. And for the cassette, I personally don't need my gears so closely spaced that I need a cassette with 9 or 10 gears...

    Second, you can still find plenty of parts for 20+ year old bikes at various locations as long as you don't worry about having the latest bling...

    BTW - My 3 year old Giant is a 24 speed. I would have been happy with 21, but on the specific model I wanted, it came with 24. The difference in number of gears is more of a personal preference and/or marketing issue rather than more or less obsolete. If you are happy with your 7 speed cassette you will be able to replace it with the same cassette for years to come.

    In my opinion, if you change in preferences, abilities or fitness you are more likely to want a different bike than to just change the gearing.

  7. Quoted message said:

    I bought a new Giant bike (hybrid). It has a 7-speed Megarange in the
    back (14-34T), which is great and fine for me. Now I've been reading
    about how they (Shimano) keeps coming out with more speeds every so
    often.. Now, I don't care frankly - I'm not an upgrader or equipment
    nerd and I'm not made of money - I just ride.

    Quoted message said:

    But, will I be *forced*
    into replacing all of my components in a couple few years when I need
    to replace the cassette?

    Quoted message said:

    Will I go in there only to find out I have to go to 9 speed, get new
    shifters, replace the frame, buy a new bike, sign over my first born
    male son, etc.. ? :-)

    I doubt it. The bicycling market is a lot more segmented than the
    advertisers would like you to believe. There are people crusing around
    town on 3-speed bikes, using Nexus hubs, singlespeeds, top-of-the-line
    Campy and Shimano gear, and wild concoctions of their own design.

    Also, changing / modifying your cassette is a pretty simple upgrade.
    You can, for example, buy older cassettes on online auction sites, or
    get creative and mix and match your own.

    The derailers and shifters won't really care, unless you add more or
    take away some cogs from the cassette spindle. Everything should work
    fine.

    I'm with you in that I, too, don't like to buy into this forced
    obsolesence to keep the consumers coming back every few years for new
    stuff. There are 10-15 year-old bikes in thrift stores that work just
    as good as new ones (or will with a little TLC).

    Don't worry too much and just ride!

  8. jj said:

    Put 3-4K miles on it each year and in 3-4 years you'll feel you're worth
    the award of a new bike, eh?

    But that's the thing - I don't want to buy a new bike in a few years.
    Maybe I'm old-school and not enough of a good little move-up consumer,
    but I thought a bike could be a frugal choice for transport (and one I
    could work on, replace parts, myself). My frame should last a long
    time (Giant aluminum), but may as well die in 3 years if it would
    require bending/rewelding to fit different gear technology.

    --The Frugal Luddite

  9. Quoted message said:
    jj said:

    Put 3-4K miles on it each year and in 3-4 years you'll feel you're worth
    the award of a new bike, eh?

    But that's the thing - I don't want to buy a new bike in a few years.
    Maybe I'm old-school and not enough of a good little move-up consumer,
    but I thought a bike could be a frugal choice for transport (and one I
    could work on, replace parts, myself). My frame should last a long
    time (Giant aluminum), but may as well die in 3 years if it would
    require bending/rewelding to fit different gear technology.

    --The Frugal Luddite

    You may be frugal, but do you not spend money on something that has great
    meaning to you?

    In four years of riding 3,000 to 4,000 miles per year, you'll have advanced
    to a level that's beyond your current understanding. You may be just a
    small threshold from riding at a level that your old bike may not be
    suitable. After 16,000 miles of riding (and yes, the Al bike should last
    that long) your perspective may be different. A person doesn't often get to
    that level of commitment without being changed. Once I reach that level,
    I'm buying a bike that's under 18lbs.

    Be aware that no matter what you do, you'll have to buy new tires, new
    tubes, new chain, among other things.

    jj

  10. Quoted message said:

    I bought a new Giant bike (hybrid). It has a 7-speed Megarange in the
    back (14-34T), which is great and fine for me. Now I've been reading
    about how they (Shimano) keeps coming out with more speeds every so
    often.. Now, I don't care frankly - I'm not an upgrader or equipment
    nerd and I'm not made of money - I just ride. But, will I be *forced*
    into replacing all of my components in a couple few years when I need
    to replace the cassette?

    No. There is a lot of 7sp stuff, and 6, and 5 out there now. Even if
    that all disappeared, which is unlikely, all you would need to do is
    get the appropriate 7 loose cogs and appropriate spacers and build your
    own cassette.

    My commute bike is an 18 year old model, getting 3500+ miles/year of
    use. The shifters, brakes, derailleurs, and cranks are still original.
    I have replaced the chainrings, seatpost, stem, and handlebars, the
    latter 3 mostly for comfort. The 6sp freewheel is two years old, still
    being manufactured today, and was replaced when the original unit came
    apart one morning dropping hundreds of tiny ball bearings on the
    street. The hubs are not the originals, but I have the originals. The
    hubs on the bike are 26 year old models, smooth as silk, plan on them
    lasting another 25-30 years or so.

    Bottom line: manufacturers make new things to attract new customers
    and lure some old customers into upgrading. But there are lots of old
    school part around, some still being made. Treat your bike well and
    hope it will last a few decades during which time you will replace a
    few parts along the way.

    - rick

  11. andy gee said:

    [email hidden] wrote in news:1126281770.193405.15990
    @g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:

    Quoted message said:

    I bought a new Giant bike (hybrid). It has a 7-speed Megarange in the
    back (14-34T), which is great and fine for me. Now I've been reading
    about how they (Shimano) keeps coming out with more speeds every so
    often.. Now, I don't care frankly - I'm not an upgrader or equipment
    nerd and I'm not made of money - I just ride. But, will I be *forced*
    into replacing all of my components in a couple few years when I need
    to replace the cassette?

    Will I go in there only to find out I have to go to 9 speed, get new
    shifters, replace the frame, buy a new bike, sign over my first born
    male son, etc.. ? :-)

    Oddly enough, I just got that speech from a backup LBS. I wanted to
    replace the 6-speed cluster on the Trek 400, and they're talking about
    bending the frame to see if an 8 will fit.

    Just say NO! What year of 400? Mine is a 1988 and the Shimano 14-28
    freewheel used on that is still being manufactured; now it is made in
    Singapore or Malaysia instead of Japan, but same design and readily
    available. Tell them to get out their catalog and order you the proper
    replacement.

    BTW, nothing wrong with spreading and going to a bigger cluster if that
    is what you want, but there is no need if you are happy with your 6sp.
    My 400 is sitting here in the office with me, will get about 50 miles
    today by the time I get home, and all on a 6sp freewheel. Jobst
    Brandt, frequent contributor to the list, rides all over the place ...
    including his annual rides in the Alps ... on 5sp freewheels.

    - rick

  12. "Rick" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:


    Just say NO! What year of 400? Mine is a 1988 and the Shimano 14-28
    freewheel used on that is still being manufactured; now it is made in
    Singapore or Malaysia instead of Japan, but same design and readily
    available. Tell them to get out their catalog and order you the
    proper replacement.

    I bought mine used. I think it's an '85; it's mangaloy 2001 (bad name,
    mangle-oy) so it's after 84 but before they went to 14 speed. I just
    took a fast google on it; the price has actually appreciated greatly
    since I bought it about 18 years ago! I'd like to see somebody's used
    car do that.

    Thanks for the tip.

    BTW do you know the basic weight (no rack, stand, horn, etc of your
    bike?

    --ag

  13. Bill Henry said:


    Quoted message said:

    But, will I be *forced*
    into replacing all of my components in a couple few years when I need
    to replace the cassette?

    I'm with you in that I, too, don't like to buy into this forced
    obsolesence to keep the consumers coming back every few years for new
    stuff. There are 10-15 year-old bikes in thrift stores that work just
    as good as new ones (or will with a little TLC).

    Yes, you shouldn't have any real difficulty finding parts for the next
    five to ten years. If you like your current bike, ride it till you
    or it fall apart.

    --
    Dane Jackson - z u v e m b i @ u n i x b i g o t s . o r g
    "I still can't understand people buying $30,000 trucks to haul their $15,000
    boats, using $100 of gas, to catch $5 worth of fish." - seen in r.b.misc

  14. jj said:
    Quoted message said:

    I bought a new Giant bike (hybrid). It has a 7-speed Megarange in the
    back (14-34T), which is great and fine for me. Now I've been reading
    about how they (Shimano) keeps coming out with more speeds every so
    often.. Now, I don't care frankly - I'm not an upgrader or equipment
    nerd and I'm not made of money - I just ride. But, will I be *forced*
    into replacing all of my components in a couple few years when I need
    to replace the cassette?

    Will I go in there only to find out I have to go to 9 speed, get new
    shifters, replace the frame, buy a new bike, sign over my first born
    male son, etc.. ? :-)

    Put 3-4K miles on it each year and in 3-4 years you'll feel you're worth
    the award of a new bike, eh?

    jj


    Back to ebay. I find it more rewarding to put together a Frankenbike
    than just go to the bike shop and buy what they want to sell me. I have
    2 LBs in my area and both have caved in to selling Chinese bikes and
    charging LBS prices. Now I only go in for maintenance parts that
    Wal-mart obviously won't have. If I can maintain an average of 4K miles
    per year and the bike is still solid why not just treat it with some new
    tires, chain, gears, or what ever? Most of the bikes at both of my LBS
    don't even have changeable chain rings, but I can buy plenty of those on
    ebay. I now run a low of 20 teeth and a high of 46 teeth in front. The
    rear is 11,13,15,18,21,24,and 28. 20/28 is way low for crawling up hills
    at walking speed and 46/11 does pretty good with a tailwind or downhill.
    There is even a 58 tooth chain ring I can bolt on but the derailleur
    won't handle the range so the 20 tooth can't get used.
    Ever try to pedal a 58/11? I could probably pedal 60 MPH on it if my
    heart/lungs/legs held out that long.

    Moral,
    Just pay attention to what you buy if it involves hundred dollar bills.
    Bill Baka

  15. jj said:
    Quoted message said:
    jj said:

    Put 3-4K miles on it each year and in 3-4 years you'll feel you're worth
    the award of a new bike, eh?

    But that's the thing - I don't want to buy a new bike in a few years.
    Maybe I'm old-school and not enough of a good little move-up consumer,
    but I thought a bike could be a frugal choice for transport (and one I
    could work on, replace parts, myself). My frame should last a long
    time (Giant aluminum), but may as well die in 3 years if it would
    require bending/rewelding to fit different gear technology.

    --The Frugal Luddite

    You may be frugal, but do you not spend money on something that has great
    meaning to you?

    In four years of riding 3,000 to 4,000 miles per year, you'll have advanced
    to a level that's beyond your current understanding. You may be just a
    small threshold from riding at a level that your old bike may not be
    suitable. After 16,000 miles of riding (and yes, the Al bike should last
    that long) your perspective may be different. A person doesn't often get to
    that level of commitment without being changed. Once I reach that level,
    I'm buying a bike that's under 18lbs.

    Be aware that no matter what you do, you'll have to buy new tires, new
    tubes, new chain, among other things.

    jj


    What is with the hangup of buying a bike that is under 18lbs? On the
    levels you will never notice it and on the uphills it may remind you to
    lose some weight on you own chassis. I ride for exercise and not
    bragging rights that I have an 18lb bike (oooh, wow.) My bike weighs
    about 50lbs and my backpack with tools and food, plus all my water
    bottles totals about 70 pounds. That is my world, country, and I go
    where there are no stores, or supples, or even phone service.
    "No, dammit, I can't hear you now. Not good". If you are a city rider
    and the bike rolls under its' owners power then why spend the money?
    Besides, some bikes have a way of becoming 'Classics'.
    Bill Baka

  16. Bill wrote:
    My bike weighs

    Quoted message said:

    about 50lbs and my backpack with tools and food, plus all my water
    bottles totals about 70 pounds.

    Quoted message said:

    Bill Baka

    HEEEEE'S BAAAAACK!!!

  17. gds said:

    Bill wrote:
    My bike weighs

    Quoted message said:

    about 50lbs and my backpack with tools and food, plus all my water
    bottles totals about 70 pounds.

    Quoted message said:

    Bill Baka

    HEEEEE'S BAAAAACK!!!


    Only part time. This group is misc. and I intend to stay misc and not
    try to corrupt the thinking of small minds.
    Fair enough?
    Bill Baka

  18. "gds" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Bill wrote:
    My bike weighs

    Quoted message said:

    about 50lbs and my backpack with tools and food, plus all my water
    bottles totals about 70 pounds.

    Quoted message said:

    Bill Baka

    HEEEEE'S BAAAAACK!!!

    I was just wondering...this sounds like BB...hey, it is!

    Good catch.

    To be fair, the only disagreement I've had with Bill is the wrong-way riding
    thing. He doesn't seem to be stupid or argumentative, just stuck on that
    one issue.

    Austin
    --
    I'm pedaling as fast as I durn well please!
    There are no X characters in my address

  19. Rick Warner said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I bought a new Giant bike (hybrid). It has a 7-speed Megarange in
    the back (14-34T), which is great and fine for me. Now I've been
    reading about how they (Shimano) keeps coming out with more speeds
    every so often. Now, I don't care frankly - I'm not an upgrader
    or equipment nerd and I'm not made of money - I just ride. But,
    will I be *forced* into replacing all of my components in a couple
    few years when I need to replace the cassette?

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Will I go in there only to find out I have to go to 9 speed, get
    new shifters, replace the frame, buy a new bike, sign over my
    first born male son, etc.? :-)

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Oddly enough, I just got that speech from a backup LBS. I wanted
    to replace the 6-speed cluster on the Trek 400, and they're talking
    about bending the frame to see if an 8 will fit.

    Quoted message said:

    Just say NO! What year of 400? Mine is a 1988 and the Shimano
    14-28 freewheel used on that is still being manufactured; now it is
    made in Singapore or Malaysia instead of Japan, but same design and
    readily available. Tell them to get out their catalog and order you
    the proper replacement.

    Quoted message said:

    BTW, nothing wrong with spreading and going to a bigger cluster if
    that is what you want, but there is no need if you are happy with
    your 6-speed. My 400 is sitting here in the office with me, will
    get about 50 miles today by the time I get home, and all on a
    6-speed freewheel. Jobst Brandt, frequent contributor to the list,
    rides all over the place... including his annual rides in the
    Alps... on 5-speed freewheels.

    When the 5-speed Regina ones went out of business, I bought a bunch of
    Sun Tour "New Winner Pro" FW's with 6-Speeds. For me it's the
    smallest and largest sprockets that are important, and that remained
    the same, I just got an extra ratio in between these.

    Many bicycle shops, and as a result, many riders, insist that to be
    efficient, one must ride at an ideal cadence is important, and
    therefore, one needs the 30 ratios common today with three chainwheels
    and ten sprocket gear clusters. Many of these folks seem to end up in
    such low gears that they are creeping up most hills. Don't despair, I
    hear 36 ratios is on the way. You see it can get worse.

    Jobst Brandt

  20. Quoted message said:

    (The words of the original poster here)


    Welcome to the <modern> world of cycling :-3(

    - -

    "May you have the winds at your back,
    And a really low gear for the hills!"

    Chris Zacho ~ "Your Friendly Neighborhood Wheelman"

    Chris'Z Corner
    http://www.geocities.com/czcorner

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.