Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

park repair stand: pcs-1 vs. pcs-4

Started by d^2 · · Last activity · 10 posts · 489 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
25 March 2005
Last activity
2 April 2005
Original author
d^2
Posts
10
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
489
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–10 of 10
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. i'm about to buy a park repair stand (sorry ultimate fans -- the
    ultimate pro didn't feel quite as stable to me and i didn't like the
    knobs/controls) but i am sort of torn between the park pcs-1 ($130) and
    the park pcs-4 ($200). the pcs-4 seemed a little more stable, and has
    a little better of a clamp, but the differences were pretty slight. (i
    put bikes in both racks and monkeyed around with them both) i would
    like to just buy the pcs-4, but i'm not convinced the better clamp and
    slightly better stability are worth 70 extra dollars. (that's 70 bucks
    that could also buy me new handlebars!) any opinions? i have two
    bikes that i will be using it on: a 19 pound road bike and a 27ish
    pound mtb.

  2. Before you blow your money on the Park.... the Ultimate CONSUMER, not
    the pro, has a great clamp. I too was considering the PCS-4 and the
    Ultimate Pro. Then I checked out the Ultimate Consumer and actually
    preferred it to the pro. It's definitely stable and has great controls.

  3. d^2 said:

    i'm about to buy a park repair stand (sorry ultimate fans -- the
    ultimate pro didn't feel quite as stable to me and i didn't like the
    knobs/controls) but i am sort of torn between the park pcs-1 ($130)


    and

    Quoted message said:

    the park pcs-4 ($200). the pcs-4 seemed a little more stable, and


    has

    Quoted message said:

    a little better of a clamp, but the differences were pretty slight.


    (i

    Quoted message said:

    put bikes in both racks and monkeyed around with them both) i would
    like to just buy the pcs-4, but i'm not convinced the better clamp


    and

    Quoted message said:

    slightly better stability are worth 70 extra dollars. (that's 70


    bucks

    Quoted message said:

    that could also buy me new handlebars!) any opinions? i have two
    bikes that i will be using it on: a 19 pound road bike and a 27ish
    pound mtb.

    I have the Park PCS-5 stand. The former folding stand. About $225 or
    so. Now Park has a new folding race stand with the same clamp. I
    think your PCS-4 has the same nice clamp. I advise going for the nicer
    clmap. The clamp is the main/only part of the stand you touch. I have
    several bikes with different size top tubes so I frequently change the
    clamp opening. If your two bikes have the same size top tube then you
    may not have to adjust the clamp much. Unless you get a different bike
    with a different top tube size.

  4. On 25 Mar 2005 13:05:29 -0800, [email hidden] scribbled:

    Quoted message said:

    I have the Park PCS-5 stand. The former folding stand. About $225 or
    so. Now Park has a new folding race stand with the same clamp. I
    think your PCS-4 has the same nice clamp. I advise going for the nicer
    clmap. The clamp is the main/only part of the stand you touch. I have
    several bikes with different size top tubes so I frequently change the
    clamp opening. If your two bikes have the same size top tube then you
    may not have to adjust the clamp much. Unless you get a different bike
    with a different top tube size.

    I was under the impression that clamping a frame tube in a repair
    stand was a general no-no - is that true, or does it depend on the
    type of frame being clamped?

    -Slash
    --
    "Ebert Victorious"
    -The Onion

  5. "I was under the impression that clamping a frame tube in a repair
    stand was a general no-no - is that true, or does it depend on the
    type of frame being clamped? "

    It's not necessarily a no-no. The preferred method is to clamp to
    the seat post, then next is the seat tube, and last would be the top
    tube. I have one bike that the seat tube does not "show" enough to
    accomodate the length of the clamp on my PCS-4, so, I just take a few
    seconds and extend the seat post to expose it enough. If you are in
    any doubt, you should contact the frame manufacturer. Older steel
    frames should be no problem (clamping on the seat, or top tubes).
    If you clamp on the frame, stick a rag in the clamp to protect your
    paint job.

    As far as "PCS-1" vs. "PCS-4" goes, the "4" has much nicer clamp (very
    easily adjustable for different tube sizes) and has less of a tendency
    to slide around on the floor. It's got four rubber feet that can
    rotate and are cam shaped, so as to compensate for an uneven floor.
    It's a great idea and works nicely to give you an extremely stable work
    platform. I checked them out side by side at the LBS and the "1"
    would slide if you got the weight back on the curve in the legs.
    The "4" seems to be much better about staying in place. FWIW, this
    thing is built like a tank and will likely be around long after I am
    gone.

  6. Slash said:

    On 25 Mar 2005 13:05:29 -0800, [email hidden] scribbled:

    Quoted message said:

    I have the Park PCS-5 stand. The former folding stand. About $225 or
    so. Now Park has a new folding race stand with the same clamp. I
    think your PCS-4 has the same nice clamp. I advise going for the nicer
    clmap. The clamp is the main/only part of the stand you touch. I have
    several bikes with different size top tubes so I frequently change the
    clamp opening. If your two bikes have the same size top tube then you
    may not have to adjust the clamp much. Unless you get a different bike
    with a different top tube size.

    I was under the impression that clamping a frame tube in a repair
    stand was a general no-no - is that true, or does it depend on the
    type of frame being clamped?

    Depends.

    Standard weight tube (heavy by rbt standards) in a Park #1
    for flats is reasonable and very fast.

    The dangerous aspect to which you refer, is the Park model
    with the adjustable cam. With little effort you can crush a
    normal round tube bike into a Colnago-like diamond section.
    Generally not acceptable for any modern seat tube and
    probably also a poor idea on a carbon post.

    We use the Ultimate design at our #1 station which is also
    very kind to frames- even thin oval carbon. If they weren't
    so impossibly hard to deal with we'd probably sell their
    stands. The product is great.

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    www.yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

  7. well, i decided to pull the trigger and got the pcs-4. the final
    reasoning was that i read that the pcs-4 was more durable, and when i
    played with it myself, it did feel a lot tougher. i figure i'd pay the
    extra 70 now in hopes that i won't have to buy another stand. also, i
    won't be second guessing myself everytime i use the clamp whether i
    should have gotten the nicer one. hearing that the rubber feet are
    more stable than the pcs-1 is just icing at this point!

  8. Slash said:

    On 25 Mar 2005 13:05:29 -0800, [email hidden] scribbled:

    Quoted message said:

    I have the Park PCS-5 stand. The former folding stand. About $225


    or

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    so. Now Park has a new folding race stand with the same clamp. I
    think your PCS-4 has the same nice clamp. I advise going for the


    nicer

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    clmap. The clamp is the main/only part of the stand you touch. I


    have

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    several bikes with different size top tubes so I frequently change


    the

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    clamp opening. If your two bikes have the same size top tube then


    you

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    may not have to adjust the clamp much. Unless you get a different


    bike

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    with a different top tube size.

    I was under the impression that clamping a frame tube in a repair
    stand was a general no-no - is that true, or does it depend on the
    type of frame being clamped?

    -Slash
    --
    "Ebert Victorious"
    -The Onion

    It depends entirely on the intelligence and judgment of the person
    doing the clamping. Most operations you don't even need to clamp the
    frame. Just sit the top tube on the clamp and leave it open. Others
    require very gentle clamping force on the tube. And if its a job that
    requires heavy force, I just lean the bike against the stand and put
    the force on the part. I don't want a bike in a stand if I have to use
    heavy force. When the heavy force pivots against whatever is clamped
    in the stand, something is likely to break.

  9. Are you going to use it just once, for a year, or for 20 years? Spread
    that $70 over 20 years, and it's pretty insignificant...

    d^2 said:

    i'm about to buy a park repair stand (sorry ultimate fans -- the
    ultimate pro didn't feel quite as stable to me and i didn't like the
    knobs/controls) but i am sort of torn between the park pcs-1 ($130) and
    the park pcs-4 ($200). the pcs-4 seemed a little more stable, and has
    a little better of a clamp, but the differences were pretty slight. (i
    put bikes in both racks and monkeyed around with them both) i would
    like to just buy the pcs-4, but i'm not convinced the better clamp and
    slightly better stability are worth 70 extra dollars.

  10. richard said:

    Are you going to use it just once, for a year, or for 20 years? Spread
    that $70 over 20 years, and it's pretty insignificant...

    d^2 said:

    i'm about to buy a park repair stand (sorry ultimate fans -- the
    ultimate pro didn't feel quite as stable to me and i didn't like the
    knobs/controls) but i am sort of torn between the park pcs-1 ($130) and
    the park pcs-4 ($200). the pcs-4 seemed a little more stable, and has
    a little better of a clamp, but the differences were pretty slight. (i
    put bikes in both racks and monkeyed around with them both) i would
    like to just buy the pcs-4, but i'm not convinced the better clamp and
    slightly better stability are worth 70 extra dollars.

    Believe me, if the pcd-4 is more stable, it's worth it. I made the
    mistake of buying a pcs-1, and regret it. The clamp is OK, once you learn
    what not to try to do with it. The stand itself tends to tip over, which
    is a RPITA, and the height being non-adjustable is another.

    --

    David L. Johnson

    __o | A mathematician is a machine for turning coffee into theorems.
    _`\(,_ | -- Paul Erdos
    (_)/ (_) |

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.