General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Panarama stuff......slightly OT

Started by Stuart · · Last activity · 22 posts · 711 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
29 September 2004
Last activity
1 October 2004
Original author
Stuart
Posts
22
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
711
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 22
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Further to yesterdays discussion on pinpointing hills on panaramas, I have
    linked the bearing calculator to the Panarmas, now clicking the image will
    reveal a list of possible hills (3° each side of the click) I have needed to
    do this due to inaccuracies that creep into the finished panorama, bloody
    annoying but will have to live with it until I resolve the issue. Saying
    that 90% the hills are very accurately positioned!.

    ONLY WORKS in Internet Explorer, will work in other browsers when I have
    some time!
    http://www.stuartstuart.fsnet.co.uk/hillwalking/panaramas.htm

  2. Stuart said:

    Further to yesterdays discussion on pinpointing hills on panaramas, I
    have linked the bearing calculator to the Panarmas, now clicking the
    image will reveal a list of possible hills (3° each side of the
    click) I have needed to do this due to inaccuracies that creep into
    the finished panorama, bloody annoying but will have to live with it
    until I resolve the issue. Saying that 90% the hills are very
    accurately positioned!.

    ONLY WORKS in Internet Explorer, will work in other browsers when I
    have some time!
    http://www.stuartstuart.fsnet.co.uk/hillwalking/panaramas.htm

    As far as I can see it works ok. in Opera 7.54.

    Never having been on top of these hills I can't say how accurate it is,
    although I recognise most of the names 🙂

    --

    Don`t Worry, Be Happy

    Sandy
    --

    E-Mail:- [email hidden]
    Website:- http://www.ftscotland.co.uk
    Looking for a webhost? Try http://www.1and1.co.uk/?k_id=2966019

  3. On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 20:11:07 +0100, "Stuart" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Further to yesterdays discussion on pinpointing hills on panaramas,

    Panorama

    I claim my PP

    SteveO

    NE Climbers & walkers chat forum;
    http://www.thenmc.org.uk/phpBB2/index.php

    NMC website: http://www.thenmc.org.uk

  4. <SteveO> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 20:11:07 +0100, "Stuart" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Further to yesterdays discussion on pinpointing hills on panaramas,

    Panorama

    I claim my PP

    Quoted message said:


    SteveO

    NE Climbers & walkers chat forum;
    http://www.thenmc.org.uk/phpBB2/index.php

    NMC website: http://www.thenmc.org.uk

    Didn't quite get this ?

  5. "Sandy Birrell" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    ONLY WORKS in Internet Explorer, will work in other browsers when I
    have some time!

    Quoted message said:


    As far as I can see it works ok. in Opera 7.54.

    Never having been on top of these hills I can't say how accurate it is,
    although I recognise most of the names 🙂

    --

    Don`t Worry, Be Happy

    Sandy

    Presumably opera must be "document.all" compliant ......don't have Opera so
    don't know

    the page now works in Firefox and netscape6+

  6. Stuart said:

    Further to yesterdays discussion on pinpointing hills on panaramas, I have
    linked the bearing calculator to the Panarmas, now clicking the image will
    reveal a list of possible hills (3° each side of the click) I have needed to
    do this due to inaccuracies that creep into the finished panorama, bloody
    annoying but will have to live with it until I resolve the issue. Saying
    that 90% the hills are very accurately positioned!.

    ONLY WORKS in Internet Explorer, will work in other browsers when I have
    some time!
    http://www.stuartstuart.fsnet.co.uk/hillwalking/panaramas.htm

    Should work fine in any Java browser since the script seems to be standard
    and not full of nasty M$ idiosyncrasies.

  7. "Chris Street" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    ONLY WORKS in Internet Explorer, will work in other browsers when I have
    some time!

    Quoted message said:


    Should work fine in any Java browser since the script seems to be standard
    and not full of nasty M$ idiosyncrasies.

    It does now Chris, however at the time of writing it didn't, different
    browsers handle code in differant ways and at that time I hadn't enabled the
    javaScript to write to the layer object in the netscape, mozilla, & Firefox
    browsers. Scripting is not at all standard accross java browsers in fact my
    code still won't work in netscape 4 browsers

  8. Quoted message said:

    Didn't quite get this ?

    Correct spelling of panorama?

    Cheers

    Andy

  9. On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 00:34:37 +0100, "Stuart" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    <SteveO> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 20:11:07 +0100, "Stuart" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Further to yesterdays discussion on pinpointing hills on panaramas,

    Panorama

    I claim my PP

    Quoted message said:


    SteveO

    NE Climbers & walkers chat forum;
    http://www.thenmc.org.uk/phpBB2/index.php

    NMC website: http://www.thenmc.org.uk

    Didn't quite get this ?

    Which bit didn't you get? You'll have to snip the text more
    appropriately to draw attention to the section you're replying to/
    raising your question over.

    hohoho, another PP to moi !!

    SteveO

    NE Climbers & walkers chat forum;
    http://www.thenmc.org.uk/phpBB2/index.php

    NMC website: http://www.thenmc.org.uk

  10. Andy Laycock said:
    Quoted message said:

    Didn't quite get this ?

    Correct spelling of panorama?

    Correctomundo

    SteveO

    NE Climbers & walkers chat forum;
    http://www.thenmc.org.uk/phpBB2/index.php

    NMC website: http://www.thenmc.org.uk

  11. <SteveO> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Panorama

    I claim my PP

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Didn't quite get this ?

    Which bit didn't you get? You'll have to snip the text more
    appropriately to draw attention to the section you're replying to/
    raising your question over.

    Well SteveO, their was only two lines a) Panorama & b) I claim my PP.....and
    since I failed to see the relevance of these two lines I snipped niether. My
    "Didn't quite get this" refereed to the whole of your post!

    Anyway, I note from your reply tp Andy Laycock you were concerned over my
    spelling. So, many thanks SteveO and thank you! Presumably you are an expert
    at spelling or at least an expert at using a spell checker! I am neither. To
    elaborate further, I spend a lot of time writing to computers, (scripting),
    now computers are really really thick, fail to spell a line of code
    correctly and they will throw an exception, now I much prefer communicating
    with people, generally they can skip over minor syntax problems because
    their brains are far more interactive.

  12. On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 10:54:56 +0100, "Stuart" <[email hidden]>
    wrote:

    Wow! If I was fishing for a bite I'd have got me a big one here... as
    it happens the opposite are being the case.

    Quoted message said:

    Well SteveO, their was only two lines a) Panorama & b) I claim my PP.....and
    since I failed to see the relevance of these two lines I snipped niether. My
    "Didn't quite get this" refereed to the whole of your post!

    <snippety snip snip>

    Soz if my post seemed to rankle.

    PPs are a gentle piece of fun = Pendant Points:

    They are, by their very nature, poking fun at the person from whom the
    PP is claimed but also at the person claiming... because the claimant
    are declaring themselves Pedantic enough to claim the Point. The
    claimee often exhibits varying degrees of response, from a guffaw of
    acceptance to apoplectic hubris.

    Admittedly PPs are a concept that u.r.w.a*kers have yet failed to
    clench to their bosom (they're a yourarsey artefact wherein [u.r.c.]
    humour runs thicker and deeper than in other places). I think there's
    only one other person around here that has a grasp of PPs, Tony of
    the House of Buckley and he's a youarsey rejec^H^H^Hader as well.

    SteveO

    NE Climbers & walkers chat forum;
    http://www.thenmc.org.uk/phpBB2/index.php

    NMC website: http://www.thenmc.org.uk

  13. "Stuart" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    <SteveO> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 20:11:07 +0100, "Stuart" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Further to yesterdays discussion on pinpointing hills on panaramas,

    Panorama

    I claim my PP


    Didn't quite get this ?

    Steve is claiming a pedant point off you for catching your misspleening of
    "panorama".

    Unless you meant "Bananarama", but they split.
    --
    "The fact remains that you do pay a (significant) premium for a brand name.
    ....Still, if I've helped that poor girl Anna Kournikova buy a new g-string,
    I consider my watch buying dollar well spent ;-)"
    - John Forster in alt.horology

  14. In message <[email hidden]>,
    SteveO@?.?.invalid writes

    Quoted message said:

    On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 10:54:56 +0100, "Stuart" <[email hidden]>
    wrote:

    Wow! If I was fishing for a bite I'd have got me a big one here... as
    it happens the opposite are being the case.

    Quoted message said:

    Well SteveO, their was only two lines a) Panorama & b) I claim my PP.....and
    since I failed to see the relevance of these two lines I snipped niether. My
    "Didn't quite get this" refereed to the whole of your post!

    <snippety snip snip>

    Soz if my post seemed to rankle.

    PPs are a gentle piece of fun = Pendant Points:

    You mean they're hung round the neck :-)}

    Quoted message said:


    They are, by their very nature, poking fun at the person from whom the
    PP is claimed but also at the person claiming... because the claimant
    are declaring themselves Pedantic enough to claim the Point. The
    claimee often exhibits varying degrees of response, from a guffaw of
    acceptance to apoplectic hubris.

    Oh I see!!

    Quoted message said:


    Guy
    --
    Guy Morgan

    First Light Services
    Lighting Design Video Projects Technical Direction Consultancy

  15. Stuart <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:

    Well SteveO, their was only two lines a) Panorama & b) I claim my PP.....and

    pp = 1

    Quoted message said:

    since I failed to see the relevance of these two lines I snipped niether.

    pp = 2

    Quoted message said:

    My
    "Didn't quite get this" refereed to the whole of your post!


    ^^^^^^^^
    PHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEEP!

    Offside and two more pp.
    --
    Gordon

  16. Guy Morgan said:
    Quoted message said:

    They are, by their very nature, poking fun at the person from whom the
    PP is claimed but also at the person claiming... because the claimant
    are declaring themselves Pedantic enough to claim the Point. The
    claimee often exhibits varying degrees of response, from a guffaw of
    acceptance to apoplectic hubris.

    Oh I see!!

    Quoted message said:


    Guy

    Well, praps, but not quite (unless you're simply being a gentleman),
    Guy. Y'see ye missed the obvious opener, your own chance to get on the
    rung... twice akshally, perhaps ;-)

    SteveO

    NE Climbers & walkers chat forum;
    http://www.thenmc.org.uk/phpBB2/index.php

    NMC website: http://www.thenmc.org.uk

  17. <SteveO> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 10:54:56 +0100, "Stuart" <[email hidden]>
    wrote:

    Wow! If I was fishing for a bite I'd have got me a big one here... as
    it happens the opposite are being the case.

    Think I was easily hookable the smorning!

    One good thing about being a bad speller, as a buyer on ebay I sometimes
    come accross items that have been spelt badly, this can be easy pickings as
    you may well be the only bidder!

  18. In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    "Stuart" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    <SteveO> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 20:11:07 +0100, "Stuart" <[email hidden]>
    wrote:

    >Further to yesterdays discussion on pinpointing hills on panaramas,

    Panorama

    I claim my PP


    Didn't quite get this ?

    Steve is claiming a pedant point off you for catching your misspleening of
    "panorama".

    Unless you meant "Bananarama", but they split.

    <groan> awful. perhaps we ought to start issuing comedy points too. An
    IOU will be accepted by the ng.

    --
    Darren

  19. <SteveO> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 10:54:56 +0100, "Stuart" <[email hidden]>
    wrote:

    Wow! If I was fishing for a bite I'd have got me a big one here... as
    it happens the opposite are being the case.

    This week I are mostly being a pedantic barstid.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Well SteveO, their was only two lines a) Panorama & b) I claim my PP.....and
    since I failed to see the relevance of these two lines I snipped niether. My
    "Didn't quite get this" refereed to the whole of your post!

    <snippety snip snip>

    Soz if my post seemed to rankle.

    PPs are a gentle piece of fun = Pendant Points:

    They are, by their very nature, poking fun at the person from whom the
    PP is claimed but also at the person claiming... because the claimant
    are declaring themselves Pedantic enough to claim the Point. The
    claimee often exhibits varying degrees of response, from a guffaw of
    acceptance to apoplectic hubris.

    The latter being more amusing, natcherlee.

    Quoted message said:

    Admittedly PPs are a concept that u.r.w.a*kers have yet failed to
    clench to their bosom (they're a yourarsey artefact wherein [u.r.c.]
    humour runs thicker and deeper than in other places). I think there's
    only one other person around here that has a grasp of PPs, Tony of
    the House of Buckley and he's a youarsey rejec^H^H^Hader as well.

    PPs have long been convertible currency in cam.misc, from whence they seem to
    have spread to both of the yewarrsees.

    (Pirates pronounce it yewARRRsee BTW :-)
    --
    "If I ever lose an eye, I'm going to get a glass eye with a big spring
    behind it. That way, when I die and Nicko comes to steal my eyes,
    when he touches the special one it'll go "SPROINGGGG!!!" and hit him
    in the face, or if I'm really lucky, he'll inhale it." - Kibo in ARK

  20. "Darren G" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    Steve is claiming a pedant point off you for catching your misspleening of
    "panorama".

    Unless you meant "Bananarama", but they split.

    <groan> awful. perhaps we ought to start issuing comedy points too. An
    IOU will be accepted by the ng.

    <g>
    --
    "I can't wait until the North Koreans have a missile that can reach
    Redmond, WA. In fact, I wish they had a PayPal account so I could
    donate something." - Karlo X in alt.religion.kibology

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.