UK and Europe · Public discussion

Panaracer Fire XC Pro's

Started by paul · · Last activity · 7 posts · 638 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
23 June 2004
Last activity
29 June 2004
Original author
paul
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
638
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hi,

    I've got a Specialized Epic with Tioga DH 2.1's on it at the mo, I'm looking
    for something with a bit more of a good XC reputation and I see the
    Panaracers Fire XC's are heavily recommended. Could any help me choose
    between the 2.1's and 1.8's ??

    I ride mostly Singletracks that aren't shodden with 10ft deep mud though do
    occasionaly come accross it. I feel like I should be buying the 1.8's but do
    you lose any grip compared to the 2.1's on climbs or anythign else notable?

    Help appreciated!

    Regards

    Paul.

  2. paul said:

    I've got a Specialized Epic with Tioga DH 2.1's on it at the mo, I'm
    looking for something with a bit more of a good XC reputation and I see
    the Panaracers Fire XC's are heavily recommended. Could any help me
    choose between the 2.1's and 1.8's ??

    I've not tried the Panaracers, but I do use Tioga Factory SL 1.8s, and
    TBH, I cant tell much difference in grip between them and the 2.1 tyres I
    had fitted before(which had really lumpy tread),but they are definitely
    easier to turn.
    I think a lot of it is down to riding style, if you are a 'light' rider
    who doesnt bash into roots/stones etc, then the thinner tyres are ok, if
    you are heavy on the tyres, then a bigger tyre may be
    better to stop punctures a little more.
    My cross bike has tubulars that are quite thin, with very little tread,
    but I never seem to lose grip with them - only when pedaling uphill on
    loose/wet ground does the back wheel start losing grip,and this is usually
    corrected by putting a bit more weight to the rear.
    Alan.

    --
    To reply by e-mail, change the ' + ' to 'plus'.
    http://www.dvatc.co.uk - Off-road cycling in the North Midlands.

  3. in message <[email hidden]>, paul

    (') said:

    Hi,

    I've got a Specialized Epic with Tioga DH 2.1's on it at the mo, I'm
    looking for something with a bit more of a good XC reputation and I
    see the Panaracers Fire XC's are heavily recommended. Could any help
    me choose between the 2.1's and 1.8's ??

    I ride mostly Singletracks that aren't shodden with 10ft deep mud
    though do occasionaly come accross it. I feel like I should be buying
    the 1.8's but do you lose any grip compared to the 2.1's on climbs or
    anythign else notable?

    My old hill bike - the one which I've put most time into tuning - has a
    1.8" Panaracer Dart on the front and a very cheap 2.3" Panaracer Smoke
    copy on the back. In really soft going the relatively narrow front tyre
    cuts through mud to find something solid to steer on, while the
    relatively big rear tyre gets a lot of grip. The front and rear tyres
    of an offroad bike do very different things, and no one tread design is
    going to both well; since the excellent smoke/dart combination is no
    longer available my favourite tyres are Velociraptors.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    ;; ... exposing the violence incoherent in the system...

  4. "paul" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hi,

    I've got a Specialized Epic with Tioga DH 2.1's on it at the mo, I'm


    looking

    Quoted message said:

    for something with a bit more of a good XC reputation and I see the
    Panaracers Fire XC's are heavily recommended. Could any help me choose
    between the 2.1's and 1.8's ??

    I are mostly riding 2.1 Fire XC's and do loike 'em.
    My mate, who is lighter at 10 1/2 Imperial Doings, has 1.8 and 2.1 XC's.
    Mostly he are riding the 2.1's in the Peak District but do put the 1.8's on
    occasionally for local bridleways but I don't think he really likes 'em,
    just uses 'em to justify the folly of the purchase.

    Pete

  5. "paul" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hi,

    I've got a Specialized Epic with Tioga DH 2.1's on it at the mo, I'm


    looking

    Quoted message said:

    for something with a bit more of a good XC reputation and I see the
    Panaracers Fire XC's are heavily recommended. Could any help me choose
    between the 2.1's and 1.8's ??

    I ride mostly Singletracks that aren't shodden with 10ft deep mud though


    do

    Quoted message said:

    occasionaly come accross it. I feel like I should be buying the 1.8's but


    do

    Quoted message said:

    you lose any grip compared to the 2.1's on climbs or anythign else


    notable?

    Quoted message said:


    Help appreciated!

    Regards

    Paul.

    Get the 2.1's, much better "all round" capability than the 1.8's (which have
    a
    different, less 'agressive' tread).

  6. paul said:

    Hi,

    I've got a Specialized Epic with Tioga DH 2.1's on it at the mo, I'm
    looking for something with a bit more of a good XC reputation and I
    see the Panaracers Fire XC's are heavily recommended. Could any help
    me choose between the 2.1's and 1.8's ??

    I ride mostly Singletracks that aren't shodden with 10ft deep mud
    though do occasionaly come accross it. I feel like I should be buying
    the 1.8's but do you lose any grip compared to the 2.1's on climbs or
    anythign else notable?

    Velociraptors model? in the winter and lovely Panaracer Fire XC 1.8
    for the rest of the year, and I love them.

    But they come from two sources ? and on the cheaper ones riders have
    complained that the knobbly bits get ripped off.
    Sorry I cant give you details but a google of the NG's may help.

  7. "taywood" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    But they come from two sources ? and on the cheaper ones riders have
    complained that the knobbly bits get ripped off.

    Some are sourced from Japan and have a stencilled effect marking, supposed
    to give them a prototype appearance. Others are sourced from Taiwan and have
    a more normal label.
    It's been alleged that the Taiwanese ones have a lower TPI carcase so don't
    ride so well, I've used both types in 2.1 and can't notice a difference and
    the knobs certainly haven't broken off even though now well worn down by
    use.
    Easy to ID them, one sort has Made In Japan embossed on the sidewall and the
    other has Made In Taiwan embossed on the sidewall, so unsubtle even I
    noticed :-)

    Pete

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.