"Sonarrat" <[email hidden]..> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:"Roubaix" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:"Sonarrat" <[email hidden]..> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:I wonder if Americans would start to pay more attention to the major
classics, rather than Le Tour, if Hincapie won Paris-Roubaix.
Quoted message said:We'll probably never know the answer to that. But if he, or another
American did, it's somewhat doubtful. Too much of a cultural difference
between the Tour and the Classics.
Well, I think of the styles of races that we have in America. Besides the
criteriums, which are emblematic of American cycling in the world view,
we've
Quoted message said:got these things which resemble the Criterium International, many of them
amateur/professional affairs... we've got small-scale stage races in the
style
Quoted message said:of the Tour de Suisse or Pais Vasco...
But then, we've got our own World Cup, too, namely the PCT (Pro Cycling
Tour),
Quoted message said:and the single biggest crowd ever assembled for an American bike race was
for
Quoted message said:its season finisher last year, the T-Mobile International/SF Grand Prix...
which
Quoted message said:I believe qualifies as a kind of American Classic. (BTW, it seems this
race has
Quoted message said:been downgraded from UCI 1.3 to 1.9.1. Why? Too popular?)
-Sonarrat.
What cycling 'stars' does the American public know if you went into a
'sports bar' and said their names? Hampsten (Grand Tour winner), Hamilton
(LBL winner)? Nothstein (Oly Gold Medal winner)? Horner?
Probably none of the above.
Both Armstrong and LeMond became popularized partially because they overcame
tremendous adversity, i.e. lots o' juicy up close and personal type stuff.
The next closest thing is Hamilton w/ his broken bones, and he's barely on
the radar, and not because of his LBL win either.
Your average Joe doesn't discern Paris-Roubaix from your local road race.
The best way for Americans to pay more attention to the classics, or any
bike race for that matter, would be to have the major sports network
producers and announcers and print media editors see a couple of _good_ US
races to learn some racing concepts, then fly them on an all expense (read:
unlimited beer) paid junket to Belgium for the two weeks leading up to and
including Paris-Roubaix.
For the media, you have real sports (pretty much anything consistently
covered on mainstream networks and major newspapers, even if it is NASCAR)
and you have freak shows. As long as the powers-that-be in the sports media
don't understand bicycle racing, it will remain a freak show in their minds.